知识产品没死,它正在变成软件
How I'd build a one-person business (if I started over in 2026) — 一人公司的本质没变,变的是容器:把知识产品升级为“学习体验”——知识库加系统提示词做成微型软件,卖你思维的第二个版本。
核心主张
一人公司的本质没变,变的是容器:把知识产品升级为“学习体验”——知识库加系统提示词做成微型软件,卖你思维的第二个版本。
Dan Koe 认为知识产品不是死了,而是撞上了市场成熟度的天花板:静态课程让人疲惫,90% 的买家根本学不完。下一步是把课程拆成知识库,配上定义角色、边界与人格的系统提示词,做成只服务一个具体问题的微型软件,让人边学、边练、边产出成品。
几条主线
容器在变,本质不变
知识产品死于市场成熟度
把课程变成软件
关键知识点
市场成熟度的五个阶段
90% 的人买课不学完
卖的是思维的第二个版本
AI 擅长工具,不擅长意义
系统提示词是什么
特定知识无法被训练
时间线
- 00:00引子:别再复述旧答案
- 01:54一、一人公司在演化
- 06:59二、知识产品为何在死
- 11:44三、教育产品的未来
- 14:20四、这套东西怎么运转
- 21:30五、微型 SaaS 的形态
- 25:38六、真的把软件做出来
- 30:05收尾:建只有你会建的东西
原话摘录
“Info products are dying because markets move through predictable stages of awareness and saturation.”
知识产品正在消亡,是因为市场会走过可预测的认知与饱和阶段。
“That said, the future of education in my eyes is learning experiences rather than static courses.”
话虽如此,在我看来教育的未来是“学习体验”,而不是静态课程。
“Before mass education existed, this is exactly how knowledge was passed down, through apprenticeship.”
在大众教育出现之前,知识正是这样传递的——通过学徒制。
“Your advantage is doing what only you would think to do with AI.”
你的优势,是做只有你才会想到用 AI 去做的事。
“So, the irony here is that AI is making human knowledge more valuable, not less.”
所以这里的讽刺是:AI 让人类知识更有价值,而不是更没价值。
行动清单
- 把你现有的课程或专长拆成一篇篇文章,做成一个可检索的知识库——这是后面所有产品的地基,跳不过去。
- 为它写一份系统提示词:角色、知识库、边界、人格四段写全,再用“学、练、做”三个标签页组织成最小的交互界面。
- 先用帮助中心、FAQ 或内部文档练手:让 AI 在提问中向你澄清、不要做假设,你只负责核对与纠正。
- 选一个工具(Replit、Cursor 或 Claude Code)立刻开始折腾,带着一个具体项目去看教程,卡住就直接问 AI 具体步骤。
- 先做完三到四个小应用再谈定价;同时把过程中形成的框架和品味持续发到社媒,让特定知识长成受众。
00:00I think it's obvious that everything is changing right now. Business, the internet, social media, coding, art. It feels like what worked just last year doesn't work anymore. And since we're here to talk about the oneperson business or just online business as a whole, because it applies to everything, I'm not here to give you just some recycled advice, right? It's 2026. We're going into 2026. Everyone's creating the best business model to start in 2026 videos. I am too for the views. But with most of those videos, they're just saying the same thing they did in 2025. And that was okay when they were saying it last year and the year before because not much changed.
00:36So I'm not going to tell you to start an agency. I'm not going to tell you to start freelancing. I'm not going to tell you to even build an info product. I'm not even going to tell you to start coaching or consulting or whatever the popular business model was like starting a community or anything. And I've already talked about those plenty of times in the past. Just go look at the oneperson business playlist on my channel. But instead, I want to show you the business model that I think makes sense right now for the next two to three years, maybe. And the reason I'm making this video is because I keep seeing online, because they're trying to get views, too, that valuebased content is dead or info products are dead or coaching is dead.
01:17And what that's doing is it's making people feel like they just shouldn't start as a creator. they should just give up and not even try because they don't know what to do. But that's just kind of how things go when a new paradigm starts to emerge because it's not like that paradigm is figured out yet. It's it's not clear. Nobody can just tell you what to do. You kind of have to try new things and experiment until you create the new thing. So let's talk about how the oneperson business is changing and then let's talk about the future of education and specifically education products and then how you can actually take advantage of this like what you can literally start doing and learning
01:54today. So part one the oneperson business model is evolving because for the past few decades info products and coaching just reign supreme. That's what you did. If you wanted to be a creator and you didn't want to rely on sponsorships and ad revenue, you would build an info product or you would do coaching. And I think those were great things because with the internet, as one person, those were kind of your only options. That's how as one singular person, that is the caveat here, one singular person, not a team, you could start an entire business online. That's crazy. That's insane. One single person could be their own marketing content, sales, product, and even I guess HR department.
02:39You write content to get traffic without needing a physical business in the right location. You do something interesting with your life or learn one of your passions enough until you become somewhat of an expert. And then you share that thing with others in an educational or entertaining way. Your brand is you. Your content are little pieces of your mind. And your products are processes that solved a problem in your life and led to something better. Many people over complicate that. One example that I would always give is if you love productivity, that was one of your passions. You studied productivity. Then you start talking about productivity online.
03:14You iterate because your content isn't going to be good at first. So you improve it until it gets good and you start growing and then you use that traffic to feed into a product. What do you build for a product? I don't know. What do you buy? What did you buy that helped you with productivity? Was it a planner? In that case, you go to Amazon, you order the top five planners, you break them down, you use them, you deconstruct them, you understand what you do and don't like about the planners, and then you create your own. It doesn't even have to be a physical product. You can create a notion template or even a printable planner or a course plus those things.
03:49It It's really up to you. And in order to make 50,000, $100,000, $500,000 a year, it's really just those two levers, right? You write content, you get traffic, and depending on the amount of traffic you get and how good your product actually is, that results in the amount of money that you make. And the beautiful thing there is that your value isn't determined by an employer. Your value is practically uncapped depending on how many people you reach. So this quickly forces you to kind of remove the employment mindset from your mind because you can make so much more just as one person. The thing here is that this is never going to go away, but the vessel by which you do it will continue to change.
04:27So it may not be a planner that you print out anymore. Now my entire goal with my brand and these videos is to help you become futureproof. That's one of my passions. That's what I like educating and entertaining around. And becoming futurep proof to me is built around two pillars. The first is how do you figure out what you want in life which incorporates psychology, philosophy and personal development. And then number two is how do you succeed with that in today's world to reach that to what you want in life and that involves skill acquisition business technology and now AI. So previously on the internet the second part of that how do you succeed in today's world especially as one person that was largely handled by having a personal brand and creating an information product or coaching information and product and coaching
05:14they're kind of the same thing just one is one-on-one the other is mass scale and that info product could evolve from a simple ebook level one a course level two a cohort level three and a community level four but now since valuebased content and info products are dead I think there's something a bit deeper at play here. You still pursue your curiosities and interests and share it with other people. But the vessel for doing that is no longer a static PDF, a course, or a community. Now, before we continue into the things you're actually here for, I want to make something very clear. I am not on the jaded side that just thinks all info products are a scam.
05:49I think they are life-changing in many ways. Yes, sure, some are scams, obviously. I think they are the antidote to the negative aspects of traditional education, i.e. conformity and getting trained into a job that you hate and not seeing any other option, the default path. I do not think that info products are going away for good. I do not think that they are dead. What I say in this video will not apply to every single industry or niche. But as with any career sector right now, especially thanks to AI, the baseline that gets results has been raised. An average person at a low level of development can take the quick and easy route very easily.
06:28You can tell AI to generate an ebook on this topic, to write viral content on this topic, to generate some images and assets and call it art, and those can make some form of money. But those people will never compete with those who understand what's going on. In other words, it's never been easier to start a mediocre oneperson business. But if you don't want to be in the lower class, I hate saying that of the creator economy. and the lower the lower class absolutely exists. You need to understand something very important. So that leads into part two which is why info products are dying. And I promise you have to understand this.
07:04I know this is just theory before we actually get into but you have to change your mind. You have to understand what's going on. You don't understand by me giving you practical steps. If you just want the practical steps and you want to fail, then go take this YouTube video, paste it into some transcription tool like Eden and go ahead try and follow it and fail. Info products are dying because markets move through predictable stages of awareness and saturation. So Eugene Schwarz, legendary copywriter, categorized these into five stages. At level one, when nobody is in the market yet, you just state what your product does and that tends to do the job.
07:38Then competitors arrive and you have to make bigger claims. Then the market gets skeptical. So you explain your mechanism. So saying I will help you make money online started to sound like a scam and you had to be more specific like implement the two-hour content ecosystem. Shout out to you if you know what that's from. But then competitors copy that mechanism and finally everyone is exhausted by claims altogether and brand starts to be the major differentiator which is happening right now with personal branding. People crave the sense of belonging they get from joining a tribe with a mission. And I've talked about that before.
08:11I'll link a newsletter that I wrote on how your mission is your niche rather than a specific skill or topic. That will help you a lot if you don't know that yet. But community and authenticity matter more than who has the best sounding product. The thing is we've hit the final stage of market sophistication across the board with info products. So the really really good ones are still going to do really really good but the average ones which is average which is the majority most people are going to do really bad. And that also means that since we're kind of like at the top of this level, that authenticity in and of itself doesn't make a difference anymore.
08:50People are just tired of seeing courses and coaching. And it sucks because those things are impactful if you're a clear thinker. But there's more to this. The select few who are smart enough to transcend info products as a whole will be the ones who win. Now, transcending doesn't mean that you just leave them behind. It means that you evolve to the next level and integrate them because education and learning as a whole is just never going to go away. But since you are competing in the space as one single person, things can become saturated quite quickly. So what I'm going to tell you isn't going to be secure for long because the next level is just around the corner.
09:30Info products didn't last that long. Maybe like a decade, 10 years, 15 years. And the next phase isn't going to even last that long. maybe two to three years and who knows what business is going to look like after that. We will be building for tomorrow rather than building for a year from now. Imagine that. That speed of iteration is just going to continue to pick up. So you have to be very speedy because that's the main advantage of being one person, right? Speed and adaptability. You don't have all of this overhead. You don't have this team. You can pick up and change things tomorrow. You must constantly be moving and iterating if you want to reach the escape velocity that actually gives you the advantage that can't be taken away from from one person.
10:10What I mean is moving beyond the one person business after you've seen a good amount of success because you'll just be competing with the same amount of people forever. And of course, AI is just going to continue to make it easier and easier to copy the front runners. So, you're not going to be a front runner for long. I see this with my content, so to say, for the longest time. I'm not like this crazy guy who just creates all these trends, but once I have like an original idea for once, it gets copied very quick and then it doesn't even seem like an original idea anymore. And that that time from something being original to being non-original is just happening like really really fast.
10:46But there's good news here. Most people just don't do anything. That sounds harsh, but you're probably in an internet echo chamber of like ambitious people. If you're watching my videos, you're probably in that echo chamber. But the average person just still treats AI as like somewhere to ask questions or they hate AI. And that may never change because the average person doesn't use their free time to learn and explore. The average person just thinks that they can do one thing, see some success, then do it for the rest of their life, and then never do anything again because they were sold this elucory retirement where all of their efforts pay
11:22off and they can just chill for the rest of their life. And we all know that's not meaningful at all. The mechanical or linear way of life is not something to bet your future on because meaning is generated from struggle, status, and curiosity. The day you stop following one of those drives is the day that your life continues to get considerably worse. And finally, that leads to part three, which is the future of education products. And I want to start this off with a quote from my book, Purpose and Profit, that's free to read on my Substack. It's no longer about sitting in front of a government-trained expert and learning the same thing as everyone else to end up with a soontobe irrelevant skill stack.
12:03It's about finding someone you relate with, someone with a shared vision for the future. Now, if you've watched my videos, you know I've always held this firm belief, even when everyone else thinks that information products are a scam, that the creator economy is this interestbased education system that is far more effective than traditional schooling at teaching people the skills that are actually relevant. Right now, I believe that people learn more faster when they learn it from someone that they relate with. I believe that anyone can follow four to five people on a topic and become very good at that thing very fast.
12:36I still hold the belief that there is knowledge and experience that only you can acquire. And I think it's noble to both acquire it and pass it down. But the format or vessel of how we pass down that knowledge needs to evolve as it always has from speaking by the fire to sending letters to building libraries to the day everything changed when the internet was born. Static courses don't cut it anymore. And I mean they do, but it because it's not like they just go to zero one day, but the general market sentiment is burnt out. A 10-hour video library where someone just like sits down and watches it for 10 hours isn't something that people want that much anymore.
13:14It feels slow and they know that there is something out there that is more efficient. Plus, it doesn't help that 90% of people that buy a course don't actually go through it and don't even get results from it. And now with AI, anyone can just generate that information if they know what to ask, which is kind of unlikely because why would they be interested in the info product in the first place if they knew what to ask? That said, the future of education in my eyes is learning experiences rather than static courses. You're not only selling information anymore. You're practically selling a second version of your mind.
13:48You're selling your coaching services, so to say, but you aren't there. Instead, you pass off everything you know to the AI and let people learn at their own speed. Now, the question here is like, oh, but what about schools that are implementing AI to teach like this? Aren't you competing with them? No. Because schools teach people what they need to operate within society. Preferably, you're teaching people something that very few people know about and schools wouldn't even think to teach. You are placing a price tag on your own curiosity and self-improvement. So that leads into part four, which is how this actually works.
14:24AI is great for utility based tasks, but not so much for meaning based tasks. That is unless you find a way to work it into your workflow in a meaningful way, which I plan to talk about. I plan to do a video on the future of writing, but that will really apply to almost any skill. It's worth watching even if you're not a writer. As an example, I had AI do a ton of writing for me last month. I'm talking like 30 articles in 2 hours. But this isn't the typical writing that I would do in my newsletters that I derive a lot of meaning from because I would have to be a lot more critical of what the AI writes. So for this little project where I generated these 30 articles, I was building a help center for Eden for my software.
15:06That way I could have the support agent or future support agents reference that as a knowledge base when they have questions or they can ask questions to it because you can just ask questions with AI. So rather than reading through all of those 30 articles, the support agent can just surface the right answer when they need it. And since I wrote these and I have them all inside of a AI project, I can just add to them at any time. Whenever we release a new feature, I can just be like, "Hey, I need to write a help center article for this. Here's exactly what it does. ask me clarifying questions if you need. It's going to pull from the other help center articles and present like an outline for it.
15:40And then I'm going to be like, "Okay, looks good. Fill it in." And then I'm going to read over that and make sure it's all accurate. Which is funny because all of the anti-AI people, they always say like, "Oh, AI makes so much mistakes." Just read through and correct the mistakes. And that still saves you a ton of time. That doesn't mean that AI isn't good. And the other thing here is that we use Intercom, which is an incredible software. They are on the front lines. I'm actually surprised of how such a large corporation can change things so fast because they have Finn, their AI agent, which can now reference this knowledge base from our website and answer questions before our support agent does,
16:16which helps resolve the like redundant questions where there doesn't need to be a human in the loop. And if you're interested in how I did this, I really just went into Claude and I asked it, "Hey, go and research how other big companies like Notion or Miro or other companies structure their help center and propose a list of all the articles I need. Here's information about my company. Here's the features we have." And then it spat out a list. And he's like, "Okay, do you want me to go through and write these?" I'm like, "Yes, but ask clarifying questions along the way so that they're accurate. Do not make assumptions."
16:48And then I just spent like an hour or two going through answering the questions and all of the articles were spit out. And two hours sounds like a lot of time, but 30 articles, 30 decent articles takes a long time to write and it's just annoying, mind-numbing. Answering questions with the AI is like kind of more enjoyable. It's kind of like a game. It's fun. So outside of the help center, just take that same concept and apply it to courses or coaching or info products. Imagine a course, but the course material was actually a knowledge base. And the chatbot that you have isn't for support. The chatbot instead is there to help people learn, practice, and implement the knowledge base or the course.
17:28That's not on the front end. That's not something that people go through. They learn it in a more interactive manner. And I'm just talking about something that is relatively beginner level here, right? You're not going and building the next like uh billion-dollar software company. You're building something small scale that is the next level up from an info product that one person businesses can sell to a specific person on a specific topic. The thing here is that an AI helping you do something like write a newsletter or learn to write or write social media content kind of like a coach that's sitting next to you and correcting you and helping you learn is
18:00much more effective than the course itself. And so the distinction here is everyone thinks they should go and build the next thing that does all of it for you, right? the agent that just writes all of your social media content when I don't think that's the way to go, right? We're still talking about education products here. And I think those are inherently more valuable because people have the drive to learn and it's just a valuable thing to do. To think that AI is just going to make learning irrelevant is kind of silly. So this is what I mean by learning experiences. They're actually interacting. They're getting feedback.
18:33They're doing the thing with guidance. That's the main differentiator. That's the main value proposition because learning by doing is the best way to learn. So hopefully people just aren't stuck in tutorial hell anymore going through endless tutorials and courses. They come away from your quote unquote learning experience with something. They a final product just by nature of how you go through it because a lot of people that go through a course aren't actually going to do the thing. The other thing here is that this isn't new. Before mass education existed, this is exactly how knowledge was passed down, through apprenticeship.
19:09A blacksmith didn't hand his apprentice a manual and just say, "Figure it out." He worked alongside him, corrected his grip in real time, and pointed out mistakes as they happened. This is why I continue saying that we're going through the return of the artisan or the next renaissance because we're kind of looping back to a lot more meaningful things. We're kind of correcting the mistakes that came with industrialization because after that period of apprenticeship, we industrialized education. We needed to train thousands of workers quickly. So, we created the lecture model. One teacher, many students, standardized curriculum.
19:42It's efficient for scale, but it's terrible for actually learning, but it turned out to be great for indoctrinating. So, for the first time since the apprenticeship model, we can have personalized interactive guidance at scale. This won't click yet for people that just think AI is the worst thing in the world because they don't see this as an option. They see AI as a thing that just does everything and removes all of the meaningful things from our lives. But that is a choice. So if I were to do this as an example, I have my course, the 2-hour writer. I would create the modules for it and that would turn into a knowledge base.
20:15This is already done since I have the course. So you don't really skip that process. And then I would build some kind of interactive chatbot. I don't know exactly what it would look like. I'm not going to do this. I haven't done this. I'm building two companies right now. But if I were still a oneperson business, then this is probably something that I would take seriously. So, I built something like a small software, right? And this would take me a bit because I'm not a programmer. And I understand that the programming or vibe coding tools today still require you to learn a decent amount if you don't want to uh make a mistake and then not be able to solve it and then either have to hire
20:49someone or just quit. So, you're going to have to learn. But for something like this, an interactive chatbot, I think this is one of the simpler things that you can do. So in my example, the software would have like three tabs. There would be learn, practice, and create. And each of those would have their own prompts, which we'll talk about in a bit. So there'd be a learning prompt that guides people through how to learn. Or there'd be multiple prompts on each page, so people can click in order and kind of go through the interactive lessons, I guess you could say. And then in the practice tab, it would be kind of the same thing.
21:21It'd be prompts that take from the lessons and tell them to try something and then grades them on it. And then there would be the create tab, which is again kind of the same thing. So this leads into part five, which is how to build a micro SAS or software as a service. And this is going to be non-exhaustive. So again, I don't think that info products are going to be dead completely anytime soon. Education is just too important for the human brain. and choosing what to be educated on based on goals you derived for yourself is still one of the last moes. Learning is too foundational to the human experience to ever be fully commoditized.
21:56With that said, I think that info products are going to look more like software over the next few years. Rather than having an ebook to download, you have a website to visit or an app to install. And idea just came to mind. I feel like a lot of the course platforms are going to pivot in some large way to help people create courses better, right? Cuz they're all implementing agents and things that you can use to help you like build the course. But what about on the end user? How are they how is the AI going to bring value to the end user? So if you want to get into that industry of building a course or information product platform, then help people do this.
22:32Rather than having an ebook to download, you would have a website to visit or an app to install. I have a few business friends who are already doing this. I know one that created an offer creation app that helps you identify your best ideas, turn them into a compelling offer, and go beyond that. As another example, rather than selling something like a how to talk to girls ebook, course, or coaching program, you create a chatbot that simulates them talking to girls. This is a really this is a copout example, but it like teaches you how to text, right? That's one very profitable industry, which is unfortunate. But another example is rather than a productivity course, you create an AI that helps them identify their vision and outline their priority tasks and gives them notifications when things aren't complete.
23:16And it can even be integrated into like a simple to-do app. But that's just much more enticing than something like buy my course. Now, if you've been following any of my videos at all or if you've seen the prompts that I've given out, you kind of know what I'm getting at here. So, any of the prompts that I've sent to my email list, I'll link some of those in the description. Those could easily be turned into a micros software. You just have to create a UI for those things and set that as the system instructions. I've also taught how to create good prompts in my video how to use AI better than 99% of people. I think it's a few videos ago, but these would become the system prompts of your little AI app.
23:52So rather than creating a very general chat GBT, you create a hyperspecific chat or software that helps people learn, practice, and do the thing you were teaching about in the first place with the info product. The question here is, "But Dan, isn't building a chat GPT wrapper cheating?" Well, by that logic, building anything on the internet is cheating. Type form, a billion-dollar company, is just an HTML wrapper. Cursor is a GPT wrapper. Any info product you build is wrapped by the platform you build it on. And if AI is like the next cloud solution, which I think it is, every piece of software on the internet will be a wrapper.
24:24So yes, as one person who has to be savvy with their resources and use thirdparty tools, a chat GBT rapper is a great way to go. So you create the course kind of like you would the knowledge base for a help center. You build out all the articles. You practically create the course and then you create what's called a system prompt or multiple of these. So like we just talked about, a system prompt is a set of instructions you give to an AI before it talks to anyone. It defines the AI's personality, knowledge boundaries, and behavior rules. You think of this as programming the AI's identity. For example, if you're creating an AI writing coach, your system prompt might include the AI's role, so how the AI should act, its instructions, what exactly it should do step by step.
25:06Its knowledge base, so all of your frameworks, processes, and examples, its boundaries, what it should and shouldn't help with, and its personality, so how it talks, what tone it uses, how harsh or supportive it is. And the prompt is what makes your AI different from everyone else's. It's your specific knowledge, your frameworks, and your voice that can help thousands of people at once. Now, can people steal this? Probably. But they could have stolen anything you build. That's just like never a valid response. So, what if they steal my idea? Again, most people just don't do anything. And now, part six, how to actually build the software.
25:41And you just use a tool like Replet or Cursor, or you can even try Claude Code, which is a terminal app. And I haven't done this, but inside of Claude, there's like a code tab that you can click on. So maybe try that. And the thing here is that yes, you will have to learn how to use this, right? We've we've heard the AI hype and we know that AI just at least now isn't this thing that just solves all of our problems and lets us do nothing and just can execute commands exactly how we ask. I don't think it can ever do that, right? Cuz how can you get so much context into one sentence, right? You can say, "Hey, create this YouTube video for me."
26:21How is it going to know what kind of YouTube video, what kind of this, what kind of this? How is it structured? What's the pacing? What's the tone? How long? What are all of the ideas that you're going to include in there? Is it just going to assume those and make those up and then you're going to put it under your name? That's not how this stuff works. So, the best way to learn something like this is to one, just start tinkering and experimenting. Once you start tinkering and experimenting, then start watching YouTube tutorials on how to use those things. And you have to have a project that you're building toward.
26:50You have to have an idea for this quote unquote info product or evolved info product that you're building. And then when you watch the YouTube tutorials, they're not going to be about how to build that. So, you're going to have to adapt and apply what they teach to what you're doing. And if you get stuck, you can just ask AI how to do specific things. I do this all the time right now. I literally ask it how to do things in Photoshop or framer all the time and it pulls from the help centers of those things or forums. An example of what you can do here is you can just ask like give me a comprehensive guide on how to vibe code correctly and then you can ask it to create a comprehensive guide on what you're trying to build,
27:26right? How create a comprehensive guide on building this AI chat app with these many tabs on this specific topic with this knowledge base. ask clarifying questions on the product if you need it and I'm one singular person with this budget so on and so forth and you just converse. Now the thing here is that this is just like any other skill, right? You don't start riding a bike immediately. You kind of fall off and then you try again and it gets frustrating. Everyone's in this like like super they need the quick result really fast. If they don't get results the first time around then they quit. But that's not how skill acquisition works.
28:02You're going to feel weird. You're going to feel overwhelmed. you're going to feel like you're not making progress for a bit. That's just how it goes. You're going to have to build three to four apps before you feel like you can actually put a price tag on one. That's why it's important to start now because remember what I talked about is that the change is going to happen really fast. It's going to happen faster than before. Info products died in 10 to 15 years. This may die in 2 to 3 years and then after that we don't even know what things are going to look like and you're going to have to adapt on the fly. So the question now is where does your advantage actually lie?
28:33Your advantage isn't doing what AI can't do because that's a losing game. Your advantage is doing what only you would think to do with AI. Not everyone types the same thing into chat GPT or rep letter cursor. Meaning the output of those things are infinitely unique. Your unique combination of interests, experiences, and insights leads to prompts and products that nobody else would create. Naval Ravocant explains this as specific knowledge. Specific knowledge can't be trained for. It comes from pursuing genuine curiosity. building it will feel like play to you. It's often at the edge of knowledge. The person who spent 10 years obsessing over productivity and then they go and build this AI software is going to build something so much more nuanced and detailed than someone who hasn't spent that much time in their domain.
29:18And it's going to be so much better and more nuanced than the person who just goes to chat GPT or Claude and tells them to build a productivity app. And if that obsessed person has built an audience on social media with said specific knowledge around productivity, then they're at even more of an advantage. So, we talked about how info products are dead in this video. We're going to talk about the whole valuebased content thing is dead in another video. So, the irony here is that AI is making human knowledge more valuable, not less. That's crazy. That's like a crazy insight because AI made everyone fast. Anyone can make a course.
29:52Anyone can write content. Anyone can copy. anyone. But very few people are uncopyable. Very few people have spent years developing so much fine-tuned experience or taste that nobody would think to copy the details that make it work. Build the thing that only you would build. Links in the description for the things that I mentioned throughout this video. If you want to be notified when these videos go out or you want to read the newsletter version of this video, subscribe to my newsletter and you'll get that. And if you download the Substack app, you'll also get a a mobile notification when that newsletter goes out.
30:26And of course, you can sign up for the Eden weight list, which is the AI canvas and drive. So you can add any of your files. You can paste links like a YouTube video and it downloads them and transcribes them. So they can be searched and referenced with AI and then you can drag them onto a canvas. Any of your files, connect them to AI chats and work in this unique and different way. And the next round of people that we bring into Eden off of the wait list will happen late And then we'll start prepping for our full public launch. So, thank you for watching. Like, subscribe if you're still here. As always, it's just a button.
30:59I'll see you in the next video.
00:00我觉得很明显,现在一切都在变。商业、互联网、社交媒体、编程、艺术。感觉去年还行得通的东西,现在就不管用了。既然我们要聊的是一人公司,或者更广义的线上生意——因为它适用于所有事——我不是来给你讲一堆照搬来的建议的,对吧?现在是2026年。我们正迈入2026年。每个人都在做“2026年最值得开始的商业模式”这类视频。我也是,为了播放量。但那些视频大多数只是在重复他们2025年说过的东西。这话去年、前年说还说得过去,因为那时没太多变化。
00:36所以我不会让你去做代理公司。我不会让你去做自由职业。我甚至不会让你去做知识产品。我也不会让你去做教练、咨询,或者当时流行的什么商业模式,比如建个社群之类的。这些我过去已经讲过很多次了。直接去看我频道里的一人公司播放列表就行。但这次,我想给你看一个我认为现在、也许未来两三年都成立的商业模式。我做这期视频的原因是,我总在网上看到——因为他们也想蹭流量——说价值型内容死了、知识产品死了、教练死了。
01:17而这会让人们觉得,自己干脆别做创作者了。干脆放弃、试都别试,因为他们不知道该做什么。但新范式刚开始出现时,事情本来就是这样,因为这个范式还没被搞清楚。它还不清晰。没人能直接告诉你该做什么。你得去尝试新东西、去做实验,直到你创造出那个新东西。那我们先聊一人公司正在怎么变,再聊教育的未来、尤其是教育产品,然后聊你怎么真正抓住这个机会——具体能开始做什么、学什么。
01:54从今天开始。第一部分:一人公司的商业模式正在演化,因为过去几十年,知识产品和教练一直独霸天下。那就是你会做的事。如果你想做创作者,又不想靠赞助和广告收入,你就会做一个知识产品,或者做教练。我觉得那都是很好的东西,因为在互联网上,作为一个人,那差不多是你仅有的选择。这就是为什么,作为单独一个人——这里是前提,一个人,不是一个团队——你可以在网上启动一整门生意。这太疯狂了。简直不可思议。一个人可以同时是自己的市场、内容、销售、产品,甚至我猜还有 HR 部门。
02:39你写内容获取流量,不需要在好地段有个实体店。你在生活里做点有意思的事,或者把某个热爱学到足够深,成为某种程度上的专家。然后你以有教育性或娱乐性的方式,把它分享给别人。你的品牌就是你。你的内容是你思想的碎片。你的产品是那些解决过你生活里某个问题、并带来更好结果的流程。很多人把这件事想得太复杂。我常举的例子是:如果你热爱效率,你去研究效率。然后你开始在网上聊效率。
03:14你不断迭代,因为你的内容一开始不会好。你改进它,直到它变好、开始涨粉,然后用这些流量去喂一个产品。那产品做什么?我不知道。你买什么?你买过什么帮你提升效率的东西?是手账本吗?那你就去亚马逊,把排名前五的手账本买回来,拆解、使用、解构,弄明白你喜欢和不喜欢它们哪里。然后做出你自己的。它甚至不必是实体产品。你可以做一个 Notion 模板,或者可打印的手账,或者课程加上这些东西。
03:49完全取决于你。而想一年赚5万、10万、50万美元,其实就靠这两个杠杆,对吧?你写内容、获得流量;流量多少、产品到底多好,决定了你赚多少钱。而美妙之处在于,你的价值不由雇主决定。你能触达多少人,你的价值就几乎没有上限。所以这会很快逼你把“打工思维”从脑子里拿掉,因为作为一个人你就能赚得多得多。关键在于,这件事永远不会消失,但你做它的“容器”会不断变化。
04:27所以可能不再是打印出来的手账本了。我品牌和这些视频的整个目标,是帮你变得“面向未来”。那是我的热情之一。那是我喜欢用教育和娱乐的方式去讲的东西。在我看来,“面向未来”建立在两个支柱上。第一是:你如何弄清楚自己想要什么样的人生,这涉及心理学、哲学和个人成长。第二是:在今天这个世界,你如何凭它成功、抵达你想要的人生,这涉及技能获取、商业、技术,现在还有 AI。以前在互联网上,第二部分——如何在今天的世界成功,尤其作为一个人——很大程度上靠的是打造个人品牌,并创造一个知识产品或教练服务。
05:14它们其实是一回事,只是一个一对一、一个规模化;而知识产品可以从简单的电子书(第一层)到课程(第二层)、到训练营(第三层)、到社群(第四层)演化,但现在既然价值型内容和知识产品都“死”了,我觉得这里有些更深层的东西在起作用。你依然追寻自己的好奇心和兴趣,并把它分享给别人。但做这件事的容器,不再是一个静态 PDF、一门课或一个社群。在我们进入你真正想看的内容之前,我想先把一件事说清楚。我不是那种愤世嫉俗、觉得所有知识产品都是骗局的人。
05:49我认为它们在很多方面能改变人生。当然,有些确实是骗局,这很明显。我认为它们是对传统教育负面部分的解药——也就是从众、被训练去做一份你讨厌的工作、看不到别的选择,只能走默认路径。我不认为知识产品会永远消失。我不认为它们死了。我在这期视频里说的,不会适用于每一个行业或细分领域。但就像现在任何职业领域一样,尤其拜 AI 所赐,能出结果的基准线被抬高了。一个发展水平不高的普通人,很容易走那条又短又轻松的路。
06:28你可以让 AI 就这个主题生成一本电子书、写爆款内容、生成一些图片素材然后称之为艺术,这些也能赚到某种形式的钱。但那些人永远竞争不过真正理解发生了什么的人。换句话说,开启一门平庸的一人公司,从未如此容易。但如果你不想待在社会下层——我很讨厌用这个词来形容创作者经济——而那个下层,绝对是存在的。你需要理解一件非常重要的事。这就引出第二部分:为什么知识产品正在消亡。我保证,你必须理解这一点。
07:04我知道在进入实操之前这只是理论,但你必须改变你的思维。你必须理解正在发生什么。光靠我给你实操步骤,你是理解不了的。如果你只想要实操步骤、然后想失败,那就把这期 YouTube 视频丢进 Eden 这类转录工具里,去照着做,然后失败吧。知识产品在消亡,是因为市场会走过可预测的认知与饱和阶段。传奇文案人 Eugene Schwarz 把它们归为五个阶段。第一层,市场上还没人时,你只需说明产品做什么,通常就够了。
07:38然后竞争者来了,你得喊出更大的承诺。接着市场开始怀疑。于是你要解释你的机制。所以“我帮你在网上赚钱”开始听起来像骗局,你得说得更具体,比如“落地两小时内容生态系统”。你知道这是出自哪儿的话,我向你致敬。但随后竞争者会抄走这个机制,最后大家对承诺彻底疲惫,品牌开始成为主要的差异化因素——这正是现在个人品牌身上发生的事。人们渴望加入一个带着使命的部落,从而获得归属感。这个我以前讲过。
08:11我会链接一篇我写的通讯,讲为什么你的使命才是你的细分定位,而不是某个具体技能或话题。如果你还不知道这一点,那会帮到你很多。但社群和真实感,比谁的产品听起来最厉害更重要。问题是,在知识产品领域,我们整体上已经撞到了市场成熟度的最后阶段。所以真正非常好的那些依然会做得非常好,但平均水平的——也就是占大多数的——会做得很差。这也意味着,既然我们已处在这个层级的顶端,单靠真实感本身已经不再有区别了。
08:50人们只是看腻了课程和教练。这很糟,因为如果你是思路清晰的人,这些东西是很有影响力的。但事情不止于此。少数足够聪明、能整体上超越知识产品的人,才会赢。“超越”并不意味着你就把它们丢在身后。它意味着你进化到下一层并整合它们,因为教育和学习整体上永远不会消失。但由于你是以一个人的身份在这个空间里竞争,事情会很快饱和。所以我要告诉你的东西,优势不会维持太久,因为下一层就在转角。
09:30知识产品也没持续那么久。大概十年吧,10年、15年。而下一个阶段甚至不会持续那么久。也许两三年,之后谁知道生意会是什么样。我们将在为“明天”而建,而不是为一年后而建。想象一下。这种迭代速度只会继续加快。所以你必须非常快,因为那正是“一个人”的主要优势,对吧?速度和适应性。你没有那么多固定开销。你没有那个团队。你明天就能调整、改变。如果你想达到那种真正属于个人、无法被夺走的优势所需的“逃逸速度”,你就必须不断前进、不断迭代。
10:10我的意思是,在取得相当成功之后,要超越“一人公司”,否则你会永远和同样数量的人竞争。当然,AI 只会让抄袭领跑者变得越来越容易。所以你当领跑者的时间不会长。可以说,我在自己的内容上早就看到这一点了。我不是那种疯狂创造各种潮流的人,但偶尔我有了一个原创想法,它很快就被抄走,然后看起来都不像原创了。从一个东西是原创,到它不再原创,这段时间真的非常非常快。
10:46但这里有好消息。大多数人什么都不做。听着刺耳,但你可能身处一个由有野心的人构成的互联网回音室里。如果你在看我的视频,你大概就在这个回音室里。但普通人仍然把 AI 当成问问题的地方,或者他们讨厌 AI。这也许永远不会变,因为普通人不会用空闲时间去学习和探索。普通人只是觉得,自己可以做一件事、看到一点成功,然后余生都做这件事,再也不做别的,因为他们被兜售了那种虚幻的退休生活——所有努力都能兑现,
11:22然后余生就能躺平。我们都知道那根本没有意义。机械的、线性的生活方式,不是可以押上未来的东西,因为意义来自挣扎、地位和好奇心。你停止追随其中任何一种驱动的那天,就是你的人生持续明显变糟的那天。最后,这就引出第三部分:教育产品的未来。我想用我书《Purpose and Profit》里的一句话开场,那本书在我的 Substack 上可以免费读。重点不再是坐在一个政府培养的专家面前,学着和别人一样的东西,最后得到一套很快会过时的技能组合。
12:03而是找到一个你能共鸣的人,一个对未来有共同愿景的人。如果你看过我的视频,就知道我一直坚信——即使所有人都觉得知识产品是骗局——创作者经济是一种基于兴趣的教育系统,它教人真正相关的技能,比传统学校教育有效得多。现在我相信,当人们从自己共鸣的人那里学习时,学得更多、更快。我相信任何人都可以就一个话题关注四五个人,然后很快变得非常擅长。
12:36我依然相信,有些知识和经验只有你能获得。而且我认为,既去获得它又把它传下去,是高尚的。但我们传递知识的格式或容器需要演化,正如它一直以来的演化——从围炉而讲到写信、到建图书馆,再到互联网诞生那天一切都变了。静态课程已经不够用了。我是说它们还有用,不会某天突然归零,但整体市场情绪已经疲惫了。一个10小时的视频库、让人坐下来看10小时,现在已经不是人们那么想要的东西了。
13:14它感觉慢,而且他们知道外面有更高效的东西。更何况,买课的人里有90%并不会真的学完,甚至拿不到结果,这一点也帮不上忙。而现在有了 AI,任何人只要知道该问什么,就能生成那些信息——不过这不太可能,因为如果他们知道该问什么,一开始又为什么会对这个知识产品感兴趣呢?话虽如此,在我看来,教育的未来是“学习体验”,而不是静态课程。你不再只是卖信息。你实际上是在卖你大脑的第二个版本。
13:48可以说,你是在卖你的教练服务,但你本人不在场。你把你知道的一切交给 AI,让人们按自己的速度学习。这里的问题是:那那些用 AI 这样教学的学校呢?你不是在和他们竞争吗?不是。因为学校教的是人在社会里运转所需要的东西。理想情况下,你教的是很少人知道、学校甚至想不到要教的东西。你是在给自己的好奇心和自我提升标价。这就引出第四部分:这到底怎么运作。
14:24AI 很擅长工具性任务,但对意义性任务就没那么擅长。除非你找到一种方式,把它有意义地融入你的工作流,这是我打算讲的。我打算做一期讲写作未来的视频,但那其实适用于几乎所有技能。即使你不是写作者也值得看。举个例子,上个月我让 AI 帮我写了大量东西。我是说两小时30篇文章。但这不是我在通讯里那种我从中获得很多意义的典型写作,因为那样我就得对 AI 写的东西挑剔得多。所以在这个生成30篇文章的小项目里,我是在为我的软件 Eden 建一个帮助中心。
15:06这样我就能让客服 agent 或未来的客服 agent 在有疑问时把它当作知识库来引用,或者直接向它提问,因为用 AI 你可以直接问问题。所以客服 agent 不必读完那30篇文章,而是在需要时直接呈现正确答案。而且因为是我写的、并且都放在一个 AI 项目里,我可以随时往里加。每当我们发布新功能,我就可以说:“嘿,我要为这个写一篇帮助中心文章。它具体是这样工作的。需要的话问我澄清问题。它会从其他帮助中心文章里取材,先给我一个大纲。
15:40然后我会说:“好,看起来不错。填进去吧。”然后我会通读一遍,确保全部准确。这挺好笑,因为所有反 AI 的人总说:“哦,AI 犯那么多错。”那就通读一遍,把错改掉。而这仍然帮你省下大量时间。这不代表 AI 不好。另外,我们用的是 Intercom,一个非常棒的软件。他们处在最前线。我其实很惊讶,这么大的公司能这么快做出改变,因为他们有 Finn——他们的 AI agent,现在能在我们的客服之前,引用我们网站上的这个知识库来回答问题,
16:16这有助于解决那些重复性问题,那些不需要人介入的问题。如果你对我怎么做的感兴趣,我其实就是进 Claude,问它:“嘿,去研究一下 Notion、Miro 这些大公司是怎么组织帮助中心的,然后给我列一份清单,列出我需要的所有文章。这是我公司的信息。这些是我们有的功能。”然后它吐出一份清单。它说:“好,你要我逐篇写这些吗?”我说:“要,但过程中要问我澄清问题,保证准确。不要做假设。”
16:48然后我花了一两个小时回答问题,所有文章就都出来了。两小时听起来很长,但30篇文章、30篇像样的文章,写起来要很久,而且很烦、很耗神。跟 AI 一问一答反而更愉快些。有点像玩游戏。挺有趣的。所以除了帮助中心,把这个概念直接套到课程、教练或知识产品上。想象一门课,但课程材料其实是一个知识库。而你有的那个聊天机器人不是用来做客服的。它反而是帮人们学习、练习、把知识库或课程落地。
17:28它不是在前端。不是让人从头到尾翻一遍的东西。他们以更互动的方式学习。我说的还只是相对入门级别的东西,对吧?你不是去建下一个十亿美元的软件公司。你在做一个小规模的东西,是知识产品的上一层,一人公司可以把它卖给特定话题上的特定人。关键在于,AI 帮你写通讯、学写作或写社媒内容,就像一个坐在你旁边、纠正你、帮你学习的教练,
18:00比课程本身有效得多。所以区别在于,所有人都觉得自己该去建下一个“全都替你做”的东西,对吧?那个直接替你写所有社媒内容的 agent,我觉得那不是正确方向,对吧?我们这里谈的仍然是教育产品。我认为它们本质上更有价值,因为人有学习的动力,而这件事本身就有价值。认为 AI 会让学习变得无关紧要,有点傻。这就是我说的“学习体验”。他们在真正互动。他们得到反馈。
18:33他们带着指导去做那件事。这是最主要的差异点。这是主要的价值主张,因为边做边学是最好的学习方式。希望人们不再困在“教程地狱”里,无止境地看教程和课程。他们从你所谓的“学习体验”里,带着某个成果离开。因为你的流程设计,他们自然就有了一个成品,因为很多上完课的人其实并不会真的去做那件事。另外,这并不新鲜。在大众教育出现之前,知识正是这样传递的——通过学徒制。
19:09铁匠不会丢给学徒一本手册说“自己搞明白”。他会和学徒一起干,实时纠正他的握法,在错误发生时指出来。这就是我不断说我们正经历“匠人回归”或“下一次文艺复兴”的原因,因为我们在某种程度上绕回到更有意义的东西。我们在某种程度上纠正工业化带来的错误,因为学徒制之后,我们把教育工业化了。我们需要快速训练成千上万的工人。于是我们创造了讲座模式。一个老师、许多学生、标准化课程。
19:42它在规模上高效,但对真正的学习很糟,不过被证明非常适合灌输。所以,自学徒制以来第一次,我们能规模化地提供个性化互动指导。对那些认为 AI 是世界上最糟的东西的人,这还不会让他们恍然大悟,因为他们看不到这个选项。他们把 AI 看成一个包办一切、并剥夺我们生活中所有有意义之事的东西。但那是一种选择。举个例子,如果我要做这件事,我有我的课程《The 2-Hour Writer》。我会为它做模块,那会变成一个知识库。
20:15既然我已经有课程,这一步已经完成了。所以你其实跳不过这个过程。然后我会做一个交互式聊天机器人。我不确定它具体会是什么样。我不会做这个。我没做过这个。我现在在经营两家公司。但如果我还是一个人公司,这大概是我会认真对待的事。所以,我会做个小软件,对吧?这要花我一点时间,因为我不是程序员。我明白,今天的编程或 vibe coding 工具,如果你不想犯错、又解决不了,最后要么雇
20:49个人,要么干脆放弃。所以你必须得学。但像交互式聊天机器人这样的东西,我觉得是你能做的比较简单的事情之一。在我的例子里,软件会有三个标签页。分别是“学”、“练”、“做”。每个都有自己的 prompt,我们稍后讲。会有一个学习 prompt,引导人们怎么学。或者每页有多个 prompt,让人按顺序点击,像走完一套互动课程。然后在“练”这个标签页,也差不多。
21:21那些 prompt 会从课程里取材,让他们尝试做点什么,然后给他们打分。然后还有“做”这个标签页,同样类似。这就引出第五部分:如何构建一个微型 SaaS,也就是软件即服务。这部分不会穷尽。再说一次,我不认为知识产品会在短期内彻底消亡。教育对人脑来说太重要了。而根据你自己推导出的目标来选择学什么,仍然是最后几道护城河之一。学习对人类经验来说太根本了,不可能被完全商品化。
21:56话虽如此,我认为未来几年知识产品会越来越像软件。不是一个可下载的电子书,而是一个可访问的网站或可安装的 app。我刚想到一个点子。我觉得很多课程平台会大规模转型,去帮人们更好地做课程,对吧?因为它们都在接入 agent 和工具,帮你建课程。但最终用户那边呢?AI 要怎么给最终用户带来价值?所以如果你想进入做课程或知识产品平台的行业,就帮人们做到这一点。
22:32不是一个可下载的电子书,而是一个可访问的网站或可安装的 app。我有几个做生意的朋友已经在这么做了。我认识一个做了“报价生成”app 的人,帮你找出最好的想法,把它们变成有吸引力的报价,并更进一步。另一个例子:与其卖一本《怎么和女生聊天》的电子书、课程或教练项目,你做一个模拟和女生聊天的聊天机器人。这例子有点取巧,但它教你发短信,对吧?这是个非常赚钱的行业,挺不幸的。另一个例子:与其做效率课程,你做一个 AI,帮他们明确愿景、列出优先任务,并在事情没完成时给他们提醒。
23:16它甚至可以整合进一个简单的待办 app。但这比“买我的课”要诱人得多。如果你一直看我的视频,或者见过我发出去的 prompt,你大概知道我在说什么。我发给邮件列表的那些 prompt,我会在简介里放一些链接。那些都能轻松变成一个微型软件。你只需要给它们做个 UI,然后把它们设成系统指令。我也在《如何比99%的人更会用 AI》那个视频里教过怎么写出好 prompt。大概是几个视频前的,但这些会成为你那个小 AI app 的系统 prompt。
23:52所以与其做一个非常通用的 ChatGPT,你做一个极度具体的聊天或软件,帮人们学习、练习、去做你原本用知识产品教的那件事。这里的问题是:“但 Dan,做一个 ChatGPT 套壳不算作弊吗?”按这个逻辑,在互联网上做任何东西都是作弊。Typeform,一家十亿美元公司,只是一个 HTML 套壳。Cursor 是一个 GPT 套壳。你做的任何知识产品,都被你搭建它的平台套着。而如果 AI 就像下一个云解决方案——我认为是的——那互联网上每一个软件都会是套壳。
24:24所以是的,作为一个人,必须精打细算资源、使用第三方工具,做一个 ChatGPT 套壳是很好的路子。所以你做课程,就像给帮助中心做知识库一样。你把所有文章建出来。你实际上就做出了课程,然后你创建所谓的系统 prompt,或者多个。就像我们刚说的,系统 prompt 是你在 AI 和任何人对话之前给它的一组指令。它定义 AI 的人格、知识边界和行为规则。你可以把它理解为给 AI 的身份编程。比如,如果你做一个 AI 写作教练,你的系统 prompt 可能包括 AI 的角色,也就是它该怎么表现;以及它的指令,它具体该一步步做什么。
25:06它的知识库,也就是你所有的框架、流程和例子;它的边界,该帮什么、不该帮什么;以及它的人格,怎么说话、什么语气、多严厉或多支持。而 prompt 正是让你的 AI 和别人不同的东西。是你的特定知识、你的框架、你的声音,能同时帮助成千上万人。那人们能偷走它吗?大概能。但你做的任何东西他们都可能偷。这从来不是个有效的回应。那如果他们偷我的点子呢?再说一次,大多数人什么都不做。现在,第六部分:到底怎么把软件做出来。
25:41你就用一个像 Replit 或 Cursor 这样的工具,甚至可以用 Claude Code,那是个终端 app。我没这么做过,但在 Claude 里有个代码标签可以点。也许可以试试。关键在于,是的,你得学会怎么用,对吧?我们听过 AI 的炒作,也知道至少现在,AI 还不是那种能解决我们所有问题、让我们什么都不用做、还能完全按我们要求执行命令的东西。我觉得它永远做不到,对吧?因为你怎么可能把那么多上下文塞进一句话里?你可以说:“嘿,帮我做这期 YouTube 视频。”
26:21它怎么知道是什么样的 YouTube 视频、什么样的这个那个?结构怎样?节奏如何?语气如何?多长?你要放进去的所有想法是什么?它就自己假设、自己编,然后你署上自己的名字?这不是这套东西的运作方式。所以学这个最好的方法是:第一,先动手折腾、实验。一旦你开始折腾实验了,再去看 YouTube 教程,学怎么用那些东西。而且你得有一个正在朝之构建的项目。
26:50你得对你要做的这个所谓“知识产品”或进化版知识产品有个想法。然后你看 YouTube 教程时,它们不会正好讲怎么建那个东西。所以你得改编,把他们教的应用到你正在做的事上。如果卡住了,你可以直接问 AI 具体怎么做。我现在一直这么干。我真的经常问它 Photoshop 或 Framer 里怎么操作,它会从那些产品的帮助中心或论坛里取材。这里你可以做的一个例子是:直接让它给你一份关于如何正确 vibe coding 的完整指南,然后再让它给你要做的东西做一份完整指南,
27:26对吧?让它给“在这个具体话题、用这个知识库、做这个有这么多标签的 AI 聊天 app”出一份完整指南。需要的话就产品问我澄清问题,我是一个人、预算是这样等等,你就这样对话。关键在于,这就像任何其他技能一样,对吧?你不会一开始就会骑自行车。你会摔下来,然后再试,会很挫败。每个人都处在这种状态——他们需要很快拿到结果。如果第一次没结果,他们就放弃。但技能习得不是这样运作的。
28:02你会觉得别扭。你会觉得不堪重负。你会有一阵觉得自己没有进步。事情就是这样。你得做三到四个 app,才会觉得自己真的能给其中一个标价。这就是为什么现在开始很重要,因为记得我说的,变化会非常快。它会比以前更快。知识产品在10到15年间“死”了。这个可能2到3年就“死”,之后我们甚至不知道会是什么样,你得临场适应。所以现在的问题是:你的优势到底在哪里?
28:33你的优势不是做 AI 做不到的事,因为那是必输的游戏。你的优势,是做只有你才会想到用 AI 去做的事。不是每个人都往 ChatGPT、Replit 或 Cursor 里输入同样的东西。这意味着它们的输出是无限独特的。你兴趣、经历和洞察的独特组合,会带来没人会去做的 prompt 和产品。Naval Ravikant 把这解释为“特定知识”。特定知识无法被训练出来。它来自追求真正的好奇心。构建它对你来说会像在玩。它常常在知识的边缘。那个花10年痴迷于效率、然后去做这个 AI 软件的人,会做出比没在领域里投入那么多时间的人细腻、详细得多的东西。
29:18而且它会比那个只去 ChatGPT 或 Claude 让它做个效率 app 的人好得多、细腻得多。而如果那个痴迷的人已经在社交媒体上用这套效率相关的特定知识建立了受众,那他的优势更大。我们在这期视频里聊了知识产品怎么“死”了。我们会在另一个视频里聊“价值型内容死了”这整件事。所以这里的讽刺是:AI 让人类知识更有价值,而不是更没价值。这太疯狂了。这是个疯狂的洞见,因为 AI 让每个人都变快了。谁都能做课程。
29:52谁都能写内容。谁都能抄。任何人。但很少有人是不可复制的。很少有人花多年时间打磨出如此精细的经验或品味,以至于没人会想到去复制那些让它奏效的细节。去建只有你会建的东西。我在视频里提到的那些东西,链接在简介里。如果你想在这些视频发布时收到通知,或者想读这期视频的通讯版,订阅我的通讯就能收到。如果你下载 Substack app,通讯发布时你还会收到手机通知。
30:26当然,你也可以加入 Eden 的候补名单,那是 AI 画布和网盘。你可以添加任何文件。你可以粘贴链接,比如一个 YouTube 视频,它会下载并转录。这样它们就能被 AI 搜索和引用,然后你可以把它们拖到画布上。你的任何文件都能连接到 AI 聊天,以这种独特的方式工作。下一批从候补名单进入 Eden 的人会在晚些时候,然后我们会开始准备全面公开发布。感谢观看。如果还在,点赞、订阅。一如既往,它就是个按钮。
30:59下期视频见。