Naval 谈新西兰:数字素养、移民、区块链与幸福
Fireside Chat with Naval Ravikant - New Frontiers 2019 — Naval 把国家、技术与个人放进同一张系统设计图:用数字素养和移民放大杠杆,用去中心化共识制衡平台垄断,再把幸福当成每天要练的功课。
核心主张
Naval 把国家、技术与个人放进同一张系统设计图:用数字素养和移民放大杠杆,用去中心化共识制衡平台垄断,再把幸福当成每天要练的功课。
他先给新西兰开两个药方:全民数字素养,加上聪明的移民政策;再梳理技术周期——平台创造、应用开发,如今重回颠覆范式,而破坏性力量总先于创造性力量。接着用拜占庭将军问题讲清区块链如何让互不信任的人达成共识,也直言加密仍是高度投机的早期资产。最后落到内心:名声是诅咒,幸福是每天要练的功课。
几条主线
一、把国家当系统来设计:数字素养与移民
硅谷不是创造创业者,而是吸引创业者——几乎所有磁石城市都是如此,所以聪明的移民政策是最大的财富创造器。新西兰本就是英语国家、法治、第一世界、教育不错、社群够小,缺的只是有意识的筛选与吸引。另一半是数字素养:计算机是人类最强工具,让人不经许可就获得无限杠杆,因此「会用计算机」就是现代的读写算。若全民都不怕计算机,工资会因鲍莫尔成本病被整体抬高,而不只是多出几个程序员。
二、技术周期与创业神话:破坏先于创造
技术总在两种阶段间摆动:先创造新平台(手机、互联网、个人电脑),再在平台上大量开发应用(移动社交)。应用同样必要,却不是颠覆范式。如今资本与创业者重新变得大胆——超音速飞机、火星火箭、电动车、自动驾驶、VR/AR、合成生物学。但技术的本性是破坏性力量先到:先有核弹再有核电站,先有网络骂战再有文明讨论。对创业者也是如此:可以作为灵感来源,却不能当作真理来源。
三、从链上共识到内心秩序
区块链解决的是拜占庭将军问题:让互不相识、互不信任的人仍能达成一致。人类靠联合成为自然界的强者,也因此能大规模互相屠杀;历史上我们用国王、贵族、宗教、民主来协调,各有取舍,几百年前又发明了市场。区块链把市场带进任何数字网络,用数学、密码学和点对点网络造出无领导的共识——这是对「全球垄断取代地域寡头、厚实中间层消失」的反制。但加密仍处早期:比特币总市值仅为黄金的百分之一量级,价格在极小概率变动下剧烈摆动。最后一层是个人:名声是诅咒,幸福要像饮食和锻炼一样,当成每天练的个人修行。
关键知识点
数字素养是新的读写算
Naval 认为计算机是人类创造过的最强工具,因为它提供「不经许可的无限杠杆」。所以会用计算机不是一项职业技能,而是现代识字能力。今天正处在过渡期:软件工程师薪资高、不愁就业,而从旧经济转出来的人却要跨一道巨大的鸿沟。他设想的国家级实验,是让全民都熟练使用这个创造性工具。
硅谷是吸引器,不是创造器
好莱坞吸引演员却并不制造演员,硅谷同样如此:它吸引想创造财富与技术的人过来。因此移民政策其实是世界上最大的财富创造器,只是多数地方靠历史偶然而非有意识设计。新西兰已具备英语、法治、第一世界、教育体系与足够小的社群等条件,可以把移民政策当作力量倍增器——哪怕只是 hf 400 这类签证,人数不多也能撬动变化。
技术周期:平台创造,然后应用开发
手机、互联网、个人电脑都是改变世界的平台;平台出现后,会进入「开发期」,大家在上面堆应用——移动社交阶段的 Facebook、Twitter 就是如此。这类创新同样必要,但属于较低层次,不是颠覆范式。Naval 认为现在技术正回到颠覆范式的阶段:超音速飞机、火星火箭、电动车、自动驾驶、VR/AR、合成生物学与远程办公。
拜占庭将军问题:陌生人如何达成一致
区块链最初吸引 Naval 的,是它对拜占庭将军问题的技术解法:让一群互不相识、互不信任的人仍能就某事达成一致。这比听起来难得多。人类因高度合作而成为自然界的强者,也因此能围绕意识形态大规模互相残杀。如何运作这个联合起来的人群网络?历史答案包括最残暴者掌权(国王)、最聪明且最暴力的少数人(贵族/精英)、宗教权威、民主投票——每一种都有代价,包括暴民统治。
区块链把市场带进任何数字领域
Uber 是调度车辆的数字网络,公共事业是调度电力的数字网络,每台手机和家里的 Wi-Fi 热点也能缝成网络——数字网络比我们以为的多。区块链让这些网络可以拥有市场机制:规则、共识、奖励贡献者、惩罚作弊者,靠数学、密码学与点对点网络实现,无需领导者。这正好反制当下的集中化:全球垄断取代了地域寡头,旧世界的「厚实中间层」消失,只剩巨头与长尾。
比特币是在给「成为数字黄金」定价
全球比特币存量估值约八百亿美元(计入丢失约七百亿,他随后更正为约一千亿),而全球黄金供给约七到十万亿美元,两者差约一百倍。比特币在数字化传输、易保管、稀缺性上优于黄金,却可能被黑、可能丢密钥。市场实际上是在给它「成为数字黄金」的概率定价,大约五百分之一到百分之一;概率稍有变动,价格就剧烈摆动,所以它今天更像一笔可能赔光的天使投资。
时间线
- 00:04开场自我介绍:在硅谷做创业者与投资人近二十年,创办 AngelList、CoinList,投资 Twitter、Uber 等。
- 01:48主持人提问:新西兰的科技生态有什么机会?一个良性生态需要哪些要素和参与者?
- 02:16第一个药方——数字素养:计算机提供不经许可的无限杠杆,会用计算机就是现代读写算。
- 04:44第二个药方——移民:硅谷是吸引器而非创造器,聪明的移民政策是最大的财富创造器。
- 06:48谈技术趋势:平台创造期之后是应用开发期,如今重回超音速、火星、自动驾驶等颠覆范式阶段。
- 09:54谈创业崇拜:硅谷确实有创业者等级制,但创业者适合当灵感来源,不适合当真理来源。
- 11:09讲区块链:从拜占庭将军问题讲到人类的各种协调制度,再到市场与去中心化数字网络。
- 16:19回应加密寒冬:市场跌九成不奇怪,比特币是在为极小概率的「数字黄金」定价,仍属早期高风险资产。
原话摘录
“Silicon Valley is not a place that creates entrepreneurs or wealth or Technology it is a place that attracts entrepreneurs who create wealth and technology”
硅谷并不是一个创造创业者、财富或技术的地方,它是一个吸引创业者来创造财富和技术的地方。
“destructive power arrives before the creative power”
破坏性力量总是先于创造性力量到来。
“blockchains use mathematics cryptography peer-to-peer networking to create digital consensus and allow truly leaderless digital networks”
区块链用数学、密码学、点对点网络来创造数字共识,让真正无领导的数字网络成为可能。
“you want to be rich and anonymous not poor and famous”
你想又富又无名,而不是又穷又有名。
“part of being happy is not caring what other people think”
幸福的一部分,就是不在乎别人怎么想。
行动清单
- 给自己列一张「数字素养」清单:挑一个你一直回避的工具(表格、脚本、API),用它把一件重复工作自动化。
- 如果你是决策者,把移民政策从「碰巧」改成「有意识」:先写清要吸引哪一种能带来杠杆的人,再设计筛选标准。
- 遇到新技术热潮时,先问它在周期里的位置:这是新平台,还是平台上的又一个应用?再决定投入多少。
- 把一件让你焦虑的长期目标,改写成每天可执行的小练习——像饮食和锻炼一样,只问今天有没有做。
- 回想一次你因为「别人会怎么看」而放弃的表达,试着公开发表一次,然后观察最坏结果是否真的发生。
00:04I'm a certain Valley in California right now where I've been an entrepreneur and investor for about two decades moved there straight out of school started starting companies because I loved science and technology and technology is the business of science or applying science and so I've started a couple of companies one that made optical amplifiers one that became what is today Google Earth one that was called opinions when public is part of shopping comm and dozens of failed efforts things you've never heard of things that you might yet Europe I started angel list which is the largest online platform for startup fundraising we've now raised over a billion dollars almost all four seed stage startups we also operate the largest free talent
00:50startup recruiting marketplace we're about half the startups in the english-speaking world find talent on there we own product hunt which is where companies go to launch their product we've also spun up coin list which is a giant well-lit regulated marketplace for crypto and I cos I've been an angel investor in companies like Twitter and Oberer and wish and post mates and a bunch of others co-authored a blog called venture hacks got a little Twitter feed and the JOBS Act which was the US law that enable crowdfunding general solicitation regulus IPOs yeah so I asked I asked involved to do that because there was no way I was gonna do justice to the bio but for those who don't know I mean
01:34involves a bit of a legend and across the world now and especially in Silicon Valley and so I'm curious from from your perspective navall what is the opportunity for New Zealand around our technology ecosystem and what constitutes the elements and the actors in a well-functioning ecosystem so I mean it's a hard problem systems design I think that's what USF was talking about he was basically positioning New Zealand as an incubator for systems design which is very seductive and very difficult because trying new systems means you're automatically doing things that the rest of the world doesn't want to or need to do so it's risky but I can throw some things out that I think are provocative and interesting let me just
02:16touch on two one is digital literacy and the other is immigration you know in terms of digital literacy I think that computers are the most powerful tool ever created by humanity they've they allow for infinite leverage without permission and to me that knowing how to be good with computers is the modern literacy it's like the new reading writing arithmetic and this will be widely accepted and acknowledged decades from now but today we're in that transition phase where as a software engineer you're very well paid and there's no unemployment but as someone transitioning out of the old economy you have this giant gap to jump so I think it would be interesting in one system design experiment that would be interesting is
02:56to create an entirely digitally literate nation where everybody is facile with computers and of course not everyone's gonna be a computer related job but just the fact that you can use this creative tool to its maximum output gives you an advantage a leg up in every possible way you'll make better podcasts you'll do better you know you'll be better at creating documents be better at coding up your ideas you'll be better at even just using online banking or your storage but just like if you understand mathematics fairly well then you don't fear science books you can pick up anything the same way if everybody understood computers well enough they didn't fear computers at all they would be highly leveraged and for
03:34innovation and employment that could be a huge thing it would also interestingly raise all the wages across the board in other professions too because there's a thing in economics called bamos cost disease where the the value that you have to pay someone their opportunity cost of what else they could be doing not initially what they are doing so even if all the baristas had computer science degrees they get paid a lot more so that's an example of something radical and interesting you could do but I don't think it's it's that radical and people often would say like well why do I need to know how to code a computer I don't need to know how to fix my car to drive
04:08my car but it's different that the car is a utility that gets you from point A to point B and you do the same thing over and over where it's a computer is a creative tool in a creative process it's not gonna be automated away and every person who uses a computer it's like using a paintbrush or or writing instrument you're using it for a different thing for self-expression a canvass of possibilities so I think having a fully digitally literate nation and New Zealand is well-positioned to do that by being english-speaking country first world rule of law good educational system and a fairly small enough community that you can make that kind of a push I think would be really interesting
04:44and you also said immigration yeah immigration is is interesting because I think people look at Silicon Valley and they say how can we create a Silicon Valley here and that's an experiment that's been tried all over the world but really Silicon Valley is not a place that creates entrepreneurs or wealth or Technology it is a place that attracts entrepreneurs who create wealth and technology and and so it's really an attractor function and that's true of almost any magnet place like Hollywood attracts the potential actors and artists into it doesn't create them those are not necessarily all native Los Angelenos although the natives really benefit from from that so I think the it's it's about attracting so intelligent immigration policy is actually
05:27the largest well creator in the world and and it's not done that intelligently in most places most places it's sort of an accident happenstance of history like oh we have it we have a Technology University here we have good weather and so on so I think that if you look at especially in the and I'm focused in technology industry obviously your for immigration you can do lots of things you can say I want to attract people who'd make an impact I want to attract teachers but whatever you're doing you can do it intentionally and at least in the technology industry these people thanks to again computers are the most leveraged people in the world so their earning power is very high
06:02so they actually choose to live in the nicest places so they want to live in places with good weather and clean water and clean air and high quality of life and culture and I think in all of those things New Zealand scores really well the timezone is great the access to the Pacific Rim is great so New Zealand to me already has a lot of the elements to use immigration policy as a force multiplier so I think it really just comes down to both attracting and screening sort of the right people with for the limited resources that you have and you know I mean look at the hf 400 visas it's gonna make a big difference before it is not a
06:36lot of people right you can you can fit them in one small or one small cluster of houses but it can in theory change change things and on the technology side I'm curious it could speak to the trends that you're seeing some of the significant trends of importance and why they're important we're actually kind of in a good phase of I think technology innovation right not there's a good or bad I don't I don't mean to judge but we've gone through different phases where we are creating and discovering and rolling out new platforms and systems that change things so for example mobile phones was a platform the internet was a platform personal computers were a platform that changed things quite a
07:14bit and then we go through exploitation phases on those platforms when we build lots of apps so you know there was the mobile social phase where we built Facebook and Twitter and so on those are interesting apps but it's kind of a lower level of innovation or it's equally necessary but not as paradigm busting and I would say now interestingly technology is going back into that paradigm busting phase where investors angels entrepreneurs are getting bold enough and emboldened and enough to take the risk to do things like hey now we're gonna develop supersonic airplanes we're gonna send Rockets to Mars we're gonna send you know we're gonna build electric cards we're gonna build autonomous vehicles we're gonna build VR and AR
07:54we're gonna get remote working right so that it feels like you're actually there we're gonna do synthetic biology and hack humans which is you know both scary and exciting scary first exciting later unfortunately it's the nature of technology that the destructive power arrives before the creative power you get to have a nuclear weapon before you get to have a functioning safe nuclear plant you get to have you know the you get the unfortunate in social media you get combat before you get civil discourse so it's it's even if you go through back to human history you get gunpowder before you get steam engines and airplanes so it's just unfortunately the nature of technology that the disruptive that disassociative power arrives first
08:39so we're gonna get all the dysfunctional dystopian things you know maybe VR and AR it's like a place for people to rally who couldn't rally in the real world or for you know how the internet famously adopts porn and gambling but almost any other application but eventually you will see the fruits come out of that if we live long enough and synthetic BIOS is an interesting one that regard AI today is going through a machine learning machine vision revolution where computers are getting very very good at pattern matching and problem solving if a very specific kind of problem but it does mean that we're gonna see very intelligent agents living in the networking cloud and changing how we do things so
09:21I think all of those are really interesting and I and I give full credit to people like Elon Musk who just really upped the bar on what's conceivable right just by doing audacious things or trying audacious things even if they fail even if they're not good at it even if you have problems with the financial shenanigans this is just at least the vision I think inspires people to move forward and he's not the only one there's a bunch of entrepreneurs now who are kind of just trying to do very audacious things and on that point some people say you know we want to shift away from this cult of entrepreneurship or this worshipping the entrepreneurs how do you feel about that
09:54there's definitely a cult of entrepreneurship in Silicon Valley there's there's kind of a hierarchy which is like all the status derives from the entrepreneur and then it sort of filters down to the other people in the ecosystem who help make things happen and then of course the users and customers and broader society that that they stand upon I just think it's a nature of humans that you you're always gonna have a little bit of hero worship you're always going to create a cult like you you you go to Hollywood and there's a cult of the celebrity I mean there's such a cult that they give each other awards every year and then we tune in to watch it so it's it's
10:25just the nature of politicians we create a cult around the top politicians without looking at all the people that they stand on it's just kind of how humans are hard-wired it's how we get inspired so I think it's completely fine to use an entrepreneur as a source of inspiration but I think it's silly to use them as a source of truth right like in fact it's silly that I'm up here but and I'm kind of giving you all this so-called truth and really I just have very narrow specialization in a very narrow set of things but somehow for some reason somebody wants to hear my opinion on everything that's the cult of personality kind of poking through but still you got
11:00to pick some monkey to get in front of the try bit you know at various points so this is my turn right now and one of those things that you've been asked that is bak chain and so I'd love to hear what is blockchain why is it important yeah I got into cryptocurrencies and block chains back in 2013 and it was to me it first fascinate is its technology solution to a very particular computer science problem called the Byzantine generals problem but all you need to understand is what they'd solve is a way of getting a bunch of people who don't know each other and don't trust each other to still agree on something and this is a much harder problem
11:34than it may sound like you know humans are highly cooperating organizing creatures much more so than almost any other species in the natural domain and that allows us to do amazing things like we can all get in this room and work together to what we believe is a better future it also allows us to do terrible things like get together in a battlefield and kill each other name some ideology you know monkeys don't have christianity or fascism they don't they don't come up with those ideology so they don't they don't murder each other in large quantities but that ability to unite together is both our superpower and our curse because when you get together how do you operate that network of
12:09people how do we make decisions and historically we've had a couple of answers and they all have different trade-offs the old answer used to be the most brutal monkeys in charge that used to be the king and that's still how much of the world lives today under dictators then it was just the smartest and most violent few monkeys who get together are in charge and that's aristocracies or if it's the smartest as the elites but you have a small number of people sort of running things for society religion was another one you know I talked to God God gave me the answers you listen to me there was another model around democracy where we're all equal we all vote but you
12:46also can end up with mob justice mob rule where the majority turn turn eyes the minority so you just have all these different systems of organizing people and in the last few hundred years we've created a new one called markets and these could be markets and you know things you like and things you don't but it's essentially just this idea that we can trade things and sort of self organizes and there's a merit model in terms of how much money I put in or what assets that put in what I get back but no one's really in charge if you look at the global credit markets debt markets equity markets money markets commodity markets no-one's really in charge so what blockchains
13:21do is they bring the ability to have markets into any digital domain so you can take any digital network and there are a lot more digital networks out there than we think so for example uber is actually a digital network that's routing cars around your local public utility is actually a digital network that's routing power around especially if we all had solar and we were trading that power today we have cell phone carriers that are top-down but actually each of our phones it's broadcasting Bluetooth and Wi-Fi and you could stay and we have Wi-Fi access points at home you could stitch together a digital network and a blockchain based network isn't owned by anybody it isn't run by anybody it's sort
14:00of I think we're sort of a temporary blip in history where all of your connections with your friends are controlled by one small set of people out of palo alto or all the digital news media in the world is run basically by twitter in youtube and it's a very small number of people so it is the nature of the current generation of technology that it is a highly centralizing force we have replaced geographic oligopolies with global monopolies well at the same time there's sort of this long tail of independent actors but that fat middle that used to exist in the old world is gone when you would have 10 ecommerce retailers and now you just have one that's kind of controlling
14:36the whole internet retail when you would have had hundreds of local dispatch taxi dispatchers but now all taxis are dispatched out of San Francisco by uber or lyft so that trend line is very worrying because that's not the internet I think we were all promised we were promised to decentralize Internet where we kind of all collectively control outcomes but like in any system you have to have rules you have to have consensus you have to have ways of rewarding people who contribute to the network you have to wait have ways of punishing cheaters who harm the network and and blockchains use mathematics cryptography peer-to-peer networking to create digital consensus and allow truly leaderless digital networks and I think that is what
15:15is compelling about them and we're starting with the financial applications because money is a ledger it's it's something that we've been historically had to put a king in charge for or a state and they have a habit you know when you hand somebody the ability to print money then they just print more of it and some of you find this way into their pockets and their and their friends pockets and it may be not a problem you Zeeland because it's a famously uncorrupt country but yeah even there right there's always something but compared to other parts of the world that are outright kleptocracy z' that can be problematic so you have things like Bitcoin that essentially separate money from India from
15:53any individual controlling the money and then it becomes collective money if theorem tries to do that for a programmable financial system and I think you'll see as block chains get good at tackling those problems and they demonstrate that they can secure something as hard to secure as the ability to make an issue and and transfer money then they can be trusted in all other aspects of life so I think it's really interesting and people say well well you know the cryptocurrency markets down 90% plus in the last year isn't it over or was it a fad or how do you respond yeah I mean look it's a it's a highly speculative market it's it's this weird combination of money and code
16:33and governance and you know calm went through this in 1999-2000 so I've seen this kind of movie before and crypto is a really hard problem crypto is you're basically saying I'm going to create digital gold I'm gonna make it unhackable even though the reward will be hundreds of billions of dollars trust me I don't have a bug in this code because if I do you lose all your money it's very hard to secure and transfer it's still very very much in development it feels like the computers were in the 1980s not where the internet was in 1990s but it's moving faster so there's still a lot of fundamental development work to be done crypto is not simple computer science it is
17:12bleeding edge computer science game theory attack vectors hacking you're trying to solve some very hard problems so it's gonna take time to figure out and today for example the total stock of Bitcoin in the world is evaluated about eighty billion dollars and or seventy billion dollars if you take into account losses and so on the the actually the actually sorry higher it would be about a hundred but the total gold supply in the world is somewhere around seven or ten trillion dollars and bitcoin does a lot of the things that gold does some better some worse better in the sense that it's digitally transmissible easier to secure more scarce worse in the sense that there might be a bug you can
17:49get hacked you might lose your password passkey which I've seen happen to friends of mine so it's if so it's still much less certain and it's much more new goals been around forever so what you have right now is the market is pricing Bitcoin as being somewhere between one five hundredth the chance of being digital gold to one one thousand two one one hundredth and when the market changes mind and these very little probabilities you're these massive swings in the price so it does end up being a very speculative instrument today and it's like an angel investment or like an early venture investment where you can lose all your money or most of it but and there's a lot of risk
18:28involved but there's also a lot of reward these are not ready for primetime yet but we're gonna go deeper on the blockchain crypto theory and the like I do want to just well we have everyone talk a little bit you're famous on Twitter now where did this come from you know and if you could talk a little bit about your becoming famous in terms of talking about the inner game of entrepreneurship yeah so Fame is a curse I don't recommend it for anybody you want to be you want to know this is glib but you want to be rich and anonymous not poor and famous like this is the disease of social media everybody is getting their 5 seconds of fame
19:03and become a celebrity and celebrities are the most miserable people in the world so it's not necessarily a good thing to go for that said you know I think what happened was like anyone who's been an entrepreneur I was running extremely high stress lifestyle and one of the things that makes entrepreneurship especially stressful is that not only are you supposed to have all the answers you know you're doing very hard work but you're supposed to never show weakness because your board members you show them weakness you know they're not gonna fund you they're not going to trust you you show it to your employees they're gonna run for the hills your customers are not gonna buy for your no partners I'm
19:38gonna partner with you so you have to show extreme stability and it's the nature of the technology business that 99 out of 100 startups effectively fail because the winners are so outsized and so rare so most entrepreneurs walking around know that they don't have product market fit to live in mortal terror of it they're not allowed to talk about it and everyone has to pretend they're winning and crushing it all the time and and this is highly stressful so it most people I think just meltdown or under the stress and they just hide it because we're not taught the modern coping tools on how to work with it and maybe ancient cultures had better answers you know you meditate you walk
20:14in nature you have closer family ties you have bigger tribes or you're just much less likely to go from being fresh out of school to landing into running a hundred person company so these are just very modern pressures and stresses and just like anybody I had to kind of work through it and as I worked through it I started using Twitter as my open diary on what I had learned that was useful to me and I think if anybody else was talking about this it wouldn't be that interesting but because you know I'm in the tech business and supposedly successful and I'm talking about it I think that gives people license to talk about it so I just decided you know
20:51five or six years ago that I was done being miserable and I was gonna be happy you know and I know this sounds easy in hindsight but it was sort of like well this entire time I've just assumed that happy people aren't successful and if I'm gonna be successful then I can't be happy I have to be miserable if I'm going to make a difference in the world I have to be unhappy along the way and I just sort of shifted my mindset and decided actually I'm out of time it's now or never there's no future to live for and if I don't figure out how to be happy I'm gonna die unhappy and it's going to and and I made it a discipline like in just like diet and nutrition and exercise these are highly personal disciplines that are unique to each of us and we have to find what works for us and know nobody else can give you can make
21:34your diet work for you because it's a battle that's fought every day you know at every meal and no one can make your exercise and fitness routine work for you because not even just a half-hour you go to the gym or workout it's literally how you carry yourself how you move what activities you volunteer for so the same way I think your own internal mental state is just as malleable but just as hard and just as individual and so I just started documenting my journey and and a lot of people actually thought it was strange and I did lose some business contacts it definitely some business over it some people were attracted to it but I don't but part of being
22:09happy is not caring what other people think and so I don't care anymore so there we go so we're gonna go much deeper on this part - we're back up here on the main stage at 2:30 so hope to see you there and we'll open the space for Q&A as well please join me in thanking the Balrog account thanks for sitting
00:04我现在人在加州的那个硅谷,在那儿做创业者和投资人已经快二十年了。我毕业后直接去了那里,开始创办公司,因为我热爱科学和技术,而技术就是科学的生意,或者说是科学的应用。我创办了几家公司,一家做光放大器,一家成了今天的 Google Earth,还有一家叫 Opinions,上市后并入了 Shopping.com,另外还有几十次失败的尝试——那些你从没听说过、也许以后也不会听说的事。我创办了 AngelList,这是最大的创业融资在线平台,我们至今募集了超过十亿美元,几乎全部投向种子期创业公司。我们还运营着最大的免费人才
00:50创业招聘市场,英语世界大约一半的创业公司都在上面找人才。我们拥有 Product Hunt,那是公司发布产品的地方。我们还孵化出了 CoinList,一个庞大、透明、受监管的市场,面向加密货币和 ICO。我做过天使投资人,投过 Twitter、Uber、Wish、Postmates 等一堆公司。我合写过博客 Venture Hacks,有个小小的 Twitter 账号,还参与推动了 JOBS Act,那是美国让众筹、公开募集和 Reg A 类 IPO 成为可能的法律。对,我请 Naval 自己来讲,因为我根本没法把他的履历讲得公道。不过给不认识他的人介绍一下,我的意思是
01:34Naval 现在算是个传奇人物了,全世界都是,尤其在硅谷。所以我很好奇,Naval,从你的角度看,新西兰在我们的科技生态里有什么机会?一个运转良好的生态,需要哪些要素和哪些参与者?我的意思是,这很难,是系统设计问题。我想这正是 USF 在讲的,他基本上把新西兰定位成系统设计的孵化器——这非常诱人,也非常难,因为尝试新系统就意味着你在做世界上其他人不想做、也不需要做的事,所以有风险。不过我可以抛出几个我觉得有挑战性、也有意思的想法。我只
02:16讲两点:一是数字素养,二是移民。就数字素养而言,我认为计算机是人类创造过的最强大的工具,它们让人可以不经许可就获得无限的杠杆。而在我看来,懂得怎么用好计算机就是现代的识字能力,就像新的读、写、算。几十年后这会被广泛接受和承认,但今天我们还处在过渡期:作为软件工程师,你收入很高、不会失业;但作为从旧经济转出来的人,你要跨过一道巨大的鸿沟。所以我觉得有个很有意思的系统设计实验,那就是
02:56打造一个彻底数字化的国家,让每个人都熟练使用计算机。当然不是每个人都会从事和计算机相关的工作,但仅凭你能把这个创造性工具用到最大产出,就给了你优势,在各方面都先人一步。你会做出更好的播客,你会做得更好,写文档更好,把想法写成代码更好,哪怕只是用网上银行或云存储也更好。就像如果你对数学理解得够好,你就不怕科学书,什么都能拿起来读。同样,如果每个人都足够懂计算机、完全不害怕计算机,他们就会拥有很高的杠杆。对
03:34创新和就业来说,这可能是件大事。有意思的是,它还会普遍抬高其他行业的工资,因为经济学里有个词叫鲍莫尔成本病——你必须付给一个人的钱,取决于他本来还能去做什么的机会成本,而不是他当下在做的事。所以哪怕所有咖啡师都有计算机学位,他们的薪水也会高得多。这就是一个激进又有意思的可以做之事的例子。但我不觉得这有多激进。人们常说:我为什么要会编程?我开车又不需要会修车。
04:08但那不一样。车是一种把你从 A 点送到 B 点的工具,你一遍又一遍做同样的事;而计算机是创造性过程里的创造性工具,它不会被自动化掉。每个人用计算机,就像用画笔或书写工具,你用它做不同的事,用来自我表达,它是一块可能性的画布。所以我认为,拥有一个彻底数字化的国家——而新西兰有条件做到:英语国家、第一世界、法治、良好的教育体系,再加上一个足够小的社群,让这种推动成为可能。我觉得这会非常有意思。
04:44你还提到了移民。对,移民很有意思,因为我觉得人们看着硅谷会说:我们怎么在这儿造一个硅谷?这个实验全世界都试过,但实际上硅谷并不是一个创造创业者、财富或技术的地方,它是一个吸引创业者来创造财富和技术的地方。所以它本质上是个吸引器,几乎所有磁石般的地方都是如此,比如好莱坞吸引潜在的演员和艺术家进来,但并不创造他们。他们未必都是洛杉矶本地人,尽管本地人确实从中大受裨益。所以我认为关键在于吸引。因此,聪明的移民政策实际上是
05:27世界上最大的财富创造器。而在大多数地方,这件事做得并不聪明,多数地方只是历史的偶然:哦,我们碰巧有——我们这儿有科技大学,我们气候好,等等。所以我觉得,特别是——我显然专注在科技行业——就移民而言,你可以做很多事。你可以说,我想吸引能产生影响的人,我想吸引教师。但无论你做什么,都可以有意识地去做。至少在科技行业,这些人——再次感谢计算机——是世界上杠杆最高的人,所以他们的赚钱能力非常强。
06:02所以他们其实可以挑最好的地方住。他们想住在气候好、水干净、空气干净、生活品质和文化水准高的地方。我认为在所有这些方面,NewZealand 得分都很高。时区很好,通往环太平洋的通道很好。所以在我看来,新西兰已经具备了很多要素,可以把移民政策当作力量倍增器。所以我觉得,归根结底就归结为:在你有限的资源下,既要吸引、又要筛选出合适的人。你知道,看看那个 hf 400 签证,它会带来很大差别,因为它并不是
06:36很多人,对吧?你把他们安置在一小片房子里就够了。但理论上它能改变事情。说到技术方面,我很好奇——能否谈谈你看到的趋势,一些重要的重大趋势,以及它们为什么重要?其实我们正处在技术创新的一个好阶段,对吧——不是好或坏,我不想做评判——但我们经历过不同的阶段:我们创造、发现并推出改变事物的新平台和新系统。比如手机是一个平台,互联网是一个平台,个人电脑是一个平台,它们都相当大地改变了
07:14世界。然后我们在这些平台上经历开发阶段,构建大量应用。所以有过移动社交阶段,我们做出了 Facebook、Twitter 等等,那些应用很有意思,但它属于较低层次的创新,或者说同样必要,但没那么颠覆范式。我想说,有意思的是,现在技术正回到那个颠覆范式的阶段:投资人、天使、创业者变得足够大胆、足够受鼓舞、足够有胆量去冒险做这些事:嘿,现在我们要开发超音速飞机,我们要把火箭送上火星,我们要——你知道——我们要造电动车,我们要造自动驾驶汽车,我们要造 VR 和 AR,
07:54我们要实现远程办公,让你感觉真的身临其境;我们要做合成生物学、改造人类——这既可怕又令人兴奋,可惜是先可怕、后兴奋。技术的本性就是:破坏性力量先于创造性力量到来。你先有了核武器,之后才有运转良好的安全核电站。你知道,在社交媒体上你不幸地先得到的是互相攻击,然后才得到文明讨论。所以,即便回溯人类历史,也是先有火药,后有蒸汽机和飞机。不幸的是,这就是技术的本性:破坏性的、分离性的力量先到。
08:39所以我们会先得到所有功能失调、反乌托邦的东西。也许 VR 和 AR 会成为那些在现实世界里无法聚集的人聚集的地方,或者——你知道互联网出了名地先接纳色情和赌博,然后才接纳几乎其他所有应用。但最终,如果我们活得够久,你会看到果实从中长出来。合成生物学在这方面很有意思。今天 AI 正经历一场机器学习和机器视觉革命,计算机在模式匹配和问题求解上变得非常非常擅长——虽然只是某一类非常具体的问题。但这确实意味着我们会看到非常智能的智能体生活在网络云里,改变我们做事的方式。所以
09:21我觉得所有这些都非常有意思。我把功劳全归给 Elon Musk 这样的人,他真的抬高了「什么才算可想象」的门槛,仅仅靠做大胆的事、或尝试大胆的事——即使它们失败了,即使他们并不擅长,即使你对那些财务上的花招有意见——至少那份愿景,我认为能激励人们往前走。而且他不是唯一一个,现在有一批创业者正在尝试非常大胆的事。说到这一点,有人说:我们想摆脱这种创业崇拜、这种对创业者的膜拜。你怎么看?
09:54硅谷肯定有创业崇拜。这里有一种等级结构:所有地位都来自创业者,然后向下渗透给生态里那些帮助把事情做成的人,然后当然是用户、客户,以及他们所立足的更广泛的社会。我只是觉得这是人的本性:你总会有一点英雄崇拜,你总会造出某种崇拜。比如你去好莱坞,那里有名人崇拜——崇拜到什么程度?他们每年互相颁奖,然后我们还收看。所以这
10:25就是政治人物的本性。我们围绕顶尖政治人物造神,却不看他们脚下的所有人。这大概就是人类被硬连线的方式,我们就是这样被激励的。所以我觉得完全没问题——把创业者当作灵感来源。但我觉得把他们当作真理来源就很傻了,对吧?事实上,我站在这里本身就挺傻的,我还在给你们讲这些所谓的真理。而实际上,我只是在一个非常窄的领域里有非常窄的专业性,但不知为何,有人想听我对一切的意见——这就是个人崇拜在冒头。不过你还是得
11:00挑一只猴子站到台前,你知道,在不同时刻轮流来。现在就轮到我了。你被问到的其中一件事是区块链,所以我很想听听:什么是区块链?它为什么重要?我 2013 年就开始接触加密货币和区块链。它最初吸引我的,是它对一个非常具体的计算机科学问题的技术解法,叫「拜占庭将军问题」。但你只需要理解:它们解决的是——让一群互不相识、互不信任的人仍然能就某件事达成一致。这个问题比听起来
11:34难得多。人类是高度合作、高度组织化的生物,比自然界几乎任何其他物种都更如此。这让我们能做出惊人的事,比如我们都能聚到这个房间里,共同为一个我们相信更美好的未来努力。它也让我们能做可怕的事,比如聚在战场上互相残杀,以某种意识形态之名。你知道,猴子没有基督教或法西斯主义,它们不会发明那些意识形态,所以它们不会大规模互相屠杀。但那种联合起来的能力既是我们的超能力,也是我们的诅咒。因为当你聚到一起,你如何运作这个
12:09人群网络?我们如何做决策?历史上我们有过几种答案,各有不同的取舍。最老的答案是让最残暴的猴子掌权,那就是国王;至今世界上很多地方仍生活在独裁者之下。然后是让最聪明、最暴力的少数几只猴子聚在一起掌权,那就是贵族制;或者最聪明的成为精英,但只有少数人替社会管理事务。宗教是另一种:我跟上帝对话,上帝给了我答案,你听我的。还有一种模式是民主:人人平等,人人投票,但你
12:46也可能陷入暴民正义、暴民统治,多数人转而欺压少数人。所以你有所有这些不同的组织人的系统。而在过去几百年里,我们创造了一个新的,叫市场。市场可以是你喜欢的东西,也可以是你不喜欢的,但本质上就是这样一个理念:我们可以交换东西,它会自我组织,并且有一种按投入多少钱或投入什么资产、就得到什么回报的绩效模型。但没有谁真正在总管。你看全球的信贷市场、债券市场、股票市场、货币市场、大宗商品市场,没有谁真正在总管。那么区块链
13:21所做的,就是把市场的能力带进任何数字领域。你可以把任何数字网络拿过来——而外面的数字网络比我们以为的多得多。比如 Uber 其实就是一个数字网络,它在调度车辆;你当地的公共事业公司其实是一个数字网络,在调度电力,尤其如果人人都有太阳能、我们在交易这些电。今天我们有自上而下的移动运营商,但实际上我们每一台手机都在广播蓝牙和 Wi-Fi,你可以——我们家里有 Wi-Fi 热点,你可以把它们缝合成一个数字网络。而基于区块链的网络不属于任何人,也不由任何人运营,它
14:00算是——我觉得我们正处在历史上一个短暂的插曲:你和朋友的所有连接,都由帕洛阿尔托的一小撮人控制;或者全世界所有数字新闻媒体,基本上由 Twitter 和 YouTube 运营,只是极少数人。所以当前这一代技术的本性,就是一股高度集中化的力量。我们用全球垄断取代了地域寡头。与此同时,也存在着独立参与者的长尾,但旧世界里那个厚实的中间层已经消失了。过去你有十家电商零售商,现在只有一家在某种程度上控制着
14:36整个网络零售;过去你有几百家本地出租车调度站,现在所有出租车都由旧金山的 Uber 或 Lyft 调度。这条趋势线非常令人担忧,因为那不是我们以为被许诺的互联网。我们被许诺的是一个去中心化的互联网,我们多少能共同控制结果。但就像任何系统一样,你必须有规则,必须有共识,必须有奖励那些为网络做贡献的人的方式,必须有惩罚损害网络的作弊者的方式。而区块链用数学、密码学、点对点网络来创造数字共识,让真正无领导的数字网络成为可能。我认为这正是
15:15它们吸引人的地方。我们从金融应用开始,因为货币就是一本账。历史上我们不得不让国王或国家来掌管它,而他们有个习惯——你知道,当你把印钞的能力交给某人,他们就会多印一些,其中一部分就这样进了他们自己和他们朋友的口袋。这在新西兰可能不是问题,因为它是出了名的不腐败国家。但即便是那里,对吧,总有点什么。不过与世界其他那些彻头彻尾的盗贼统治相比,那可能就有问题了。所以有了比特币这样的东西,它本质上是把货币从
15:53任何个人对货币的控制中分离出来,然后它变成集体货币。以太坊则试图为一个可编程的金融系统做到这一点。我认为你会看到,随着区块链越来越擅长解决这些问题,并证明它们能够保护好「发行和转移货币」这么难保护的东西,它们就能在生活的所有其他方面被信任。所以我觉得这真的很有意思。而人们会说:你知道,加密货币市场去年跌了 90% 以上,是不是结束了?还是说它只是一阵风潮?你怎么回应?是啊,你看,这是一个高度投机性的市场,它是货币和代码
16:33和治理的奇怪组合。你知道,互联网在 1999 到 2000 年也经历过这个,所以这种电影我看过。而加密是很难的问题。加密基本上是在说:我要创造数字黄金,我要让它无法被攻破,尽管回报会有几千亿美元——相信我,我的代码里没有 bug,因为一旦有,你的钱就全没了。它极难保护、极难转移,仍然非常非常处于开发中。感觉像 1980 年代的计算机,而不是 1990 年代的互联网,但它发展得更快。所以还有大量基础开发工作要做。加密不是简单的计算机科学,它是
17:12最前沿的计算机科学、博弈论、攻击向量、黑客技术——你在试图解决一些非常难的问题,所以需要时间去搞清楚。比如今天,全世界比特币的总存量估值大约八百亿美元,或者说七百亿,如果把各种丢失算进去。实际上——抱歉,应该更高,大约一千亿。而全世界的黄金总供给大约在七到十万亿美元。比特币能做到黄金的很多功能,有些更好,有些更差。更好的地方在于它可以数字化传输、更容易保管、更稀缺;更差的地方在于它可能有 bug,你可能
17:49被黑,你可能弄丢密码或密钥——我见过朋友身上发生这种事。所以它仍然确定性低得多,也新得多;黄金则存在了不知多久。所以现在的情况是:市场给比特币定价,认为它成为数字黄金的概率大约在五百分之一到一千分之一、百分之一之间。而当市场改变主意时,在这些极小的概率上,你就得到巨大的价格波动。所以它今天确实是一种非常投机性的工具,就像一笔天使投资,或者早期风险投资,你可能赔光所有钱或大部分钱。风险
18:28很大,但回报也很大。这些东西还没准备好登上黄金时段。我们之后会更深地谈区块链、加密理论等等。不过我想——既然大家都在,先请你聊一点:你现在在 Twitter 上很有名,这是怎么来的?能否谈谈你是怎么因为讲创业的「内在游戏」而出名的?是啊,名声是个诅咒,我不推荐任何人去要它。你想成为——这话有点轻巧——你想又富又无名,而不是又穷又有名。这就是社交媒体的病:每个人都得到自己那 5 秒的名气,
19:03成了名人,而名人是世界上最痛苦的人。所以追求那个未必是好事。话虽如此,你知道,我觉得事情的经过是:像任何做过创业者的人一样,我当时过着压力极高的生活。让创业格外有压力的一点是:你不仅被期望知道所有答案——你知道,你在做非常难的工作——而且被期望永远不示弱,因为你的董事——你向他们示弱,你知道,他们就不会投你、不会信任你;你向员工示弱,他们就会跑得远远的;客户不会买;合伙人——没人
19:38会跟我合作。所以你必须表现出极端的稳定。而科技行业的本性是:100 家创业公司里有 99 家实际上会失败,因为赢家的回报太巨大、也太稀有。所以大多数走在路上的创业者都清楚自己没有产品市场契合,活在极度的恐惧里,却不被允许谈论它,每个人都必须假装自己一直在赢、一直在碾压。这压力极大。所以我认为大多数人就在压力下崩溃了,然后把它藏起来,因为我们没被教过现代应对工具该怎么处理它。也许古老的文化有更好的答案:你冥想,你在自然中
20:14散步,你有更紧密的家庭纽带,你身处更大的部落;或者你根本不太可能刚从学校毕业就去经营一家上百人的公司。所以这些都只是非常现代的压力。像任何人一样,我得慢慢熬过去。而在熬的过程中,我开始把 Twitter 当作公开日记,记下对我有用的心得。我觉得如果是别人在谈这些,可能没那么有意思;但因为我在科技行业、而且算是个「成功人士」,我却在谈这个,我认为这就给了别人许可去谈。所以我就决定——你知道,
20:51五六年前——我不再痛苦了,我要幸福。我知道事后看这很容易,但当时是这样:这么长时间以来,我一直假设幸福的人不成功;如果我要成功,我就不能幸福,我必须痛苦;如果我要在世界上有所作为,我沿途就必须不快乐。而我就这样转变了心态,认定:其实我没时间了,要么现在要么永远没有;没有未来可以为之而活;如果我想不出怎么幸福,我就会不幸福地死去。而且——我把它变成一门修行。就像饮食、营养和锻炼,这些都是高度个人化的修行,因人而异,我们必须找到适合自己的,而且要知道没人能替你
21:34让你的饮食奏效,因为那是每天都在打的仗,你知道,每一餐都在打。也没人能让你的锻炼和健身计划奏效,因为那不只是半小时你去健身房或锻炼,它实际上是你如何举止、如何行动、你主动承担哪些活动。同样地,我认为你内在的心理状态同样可塑,但也同样困难、同样因人而异。所以我就开始记录我的旅程。很多人其实觉得这很怪,我确实失去了一些商业关系,因此肯定丢了些生意;也有些人被它吸引。但我不——不过,幸福的
22:09一部分就是不在乎别人怎么想,所以我不再在乎了。就这样。这部分我们会谈得更深——2:30 我们会回到主舞台,希望到时见到你。我们也会开放问答环节。请和我一起感谢 Balrog 账号,谢谢你坐在这里。