Talks Archive 长视频知识库
YouTube ↗
← 返回 Naval Ravikant 档案

Naval 谈幸福:它不是目标,而是一项可以练出来的技能

2025-09-23 1:03:36 4.3万次播放 418 句对照 YouTube ↗

My Conversation with Naval on Learning Happiness — 幸福不是外部世界给的,也不是某个念头。它是一项可练的技能:看穿自我只是念头,把身份变薄,按季节安排财富、健康与幸福。

幸福作为技能无我与念头选择理论人生的季节关系与真相
01

核心主张

幸福不是外部世界给的,也不是某个念头。它是一项可练的技能:看穿自我只是念头,把身份变薄,按季节安排财富、健康与幸福。

Naval 说幸福对不同人有不同含义:念头来了又走,认同它就造出一个「我」。他从叔本华的无聊谈到 Deutsch 的通用解释者,落到真、爱、美——健康是底线,财富解决钱的问题,幸福最重要却最容易被推迟。身份越薄越看得清现实,慢性不快乐是自我的表演,好的关系是两个本来就快乐的人。

02

几条主线

这个视频反复回到的几个论点。

一、幸福是技能,不是状态:念头、自我与平静

Naval 一开口就把这个话题拆掉了:幸福这个词对不同人有不同含义,而他最新的想法是「根本没有幸福这种东西」。理由是一套念头论——念头来了又走,念头宣称自己就是「我」,但仔细去找,那个「我」永远钉不住。认同念头,你就造出一个幸福的「我」或不幸的「我」;念头一走,那里什么都没有。所以外部的世界既不提供幸福也不提供不幸,你只是把自己编的解释当了真。他不追求「幸福」,他追求平静:禅宗式的「对事物本来的样子安然」,欲望少且是自觉选择的,做比自己更大的事。但他也承认无聊是问题——叔本华说无聊揭示存在的空虚,而乐观的解读是:那只是被快乐惯坏的心智。于是他给了一个实用定义:冥想不是为了开悟,而是为了能自我观察,在念头接管的瞬间抓住自己,然后问一句「这是真的吗,我真的要为此受苦吗」。他还留了一个动人的自我观察:在极度不快乐的时期,有一部分的他只是旁观那个不快乐的部分,心想「这是你演的一出小戏,为了感觉自己重要,但这里其实什么都没有」。

二、财富、健康、幸福:顺序与季节

这一节的核心推文是:人生三件大事是财富、健康和幸福,我们按这个顺序追求,但重要程度正好相反。Naval 对顺序没有强意见,对成分有:天生快乐的人是拿到最伟大礼物的人,不需要另外两样;不健康的人不会真的在乎财富,所以健康重于财富。他也给了年龄剧本:十几岁学习和动手,二十多岁在竞技场里拼命,三十多岁开始收获,四十多岁必须收获并盯住健康,五十多岁回馈社会,六十多岁当哲学家。罗马时代也差不多是这个节奏。真正值得警惕的失败模式是:把大半生押在财富上,牺牲健康和幸福,等发现时早已越过财富门槛,而身份已经固化到无法改变。他观察同代富人:健康问题大家迟早会想明白(疼痛的反馈回路很紧,还有 GLP-1),但幸福很难——很多人连「可以按自己的方式建生活」这种想象力都没有,孩子上学所以不能旅行、不请帮手因为「应该自己洗碗」,在工作上极高自主性,在生活其余部分极低自主性。

三、身份、真相与关系:把束身衣脱下来

Naval 把身份讲成一件束身衣:身份越薄,你越看得清现实;任何「被选择的身份」都把你锁死。这也是种族主义的问题——人们无法改变自己的身份,于是一被触碰就开战。他借 William Glasser 的选择理论说,抑郁可能是一系列小时候的选择变成了无意识习惯、再自我延续:哭不管用了,就转向内部哭,用「我愿意伤害自己」来换取注意。他不否认化学与遗传因素,但说「全是化学失衡」什么也没解释——那和「我们为什么在这里?因为大爆炸的粒子碰撞」一样还原。身份的另一端是关系:他主张「去爱」比「被爱」更好,因为被爱太满会变成负担;他相信的只有平等关系,不做义务性的生日、婚礼、周年,因为义务把关系推进痛苦。他自己没有疏远的家人,但底线很清楚:我不会留在一段让我不快乐的关系里,我会尽责、会照顾,但不维持假关系。「幸福关系的秘诀是两个快乐的人」——你不能替对方快乐,也不能让对方替你快乐。最后落到真相:真相不可谈判,而所谓仪式化的庆祝(情人节、贺卡、奖章)只是每年打个勾、把事情往后拖。

03

关键知识点

每个知识点都挂着时间戳,点击回到原片对应位置。

「幸福」也许不存在,它只是一个念头

Naval 说他最新的想法是「根本没有幸福这种东西」,并愿意给出二十句互相矛盾的说法。理由是:念头进来说「我幸福」,念头走了就没有人幸福;念头说「我不幸福」,念头走了就没有人不幸福。所谓幸福与不幸,是一个定义极模糊的「自我」在认同念头时临时造出来的。

冥想的目的不是开悟,而是能自我观察

冥想不会让你开悟,也不一定立刻让你更快乐或更平静。它的作用只是让你变得能观察自己:当你更有自我觉察,就能抓到心智正在做一些不符合长期利益的事,然后重置它,或者停下来问——这是真的吗?这是我真正想经历的吗?这个欲望真的重要吗?哪个更容易:重新解释它,还是处理底层问题?

急性不快乐有用,慢性不快乐是自我的表演

Naval 在访谈中当场发了一条推文:急性不快乐是真实的、甚至是有用的,但慢性不快乐是一场自我(ego)的表演。因为慢性不快乐真正想要的是「更多地感觉到自己」——感觉自己分离、感觉自己重要。很多人误以为培养不快乐会给情境带来严肃感,尤其在当领导者时,结果只是把一个不快乐的自己带进现场。

凡事都有季节:二十多岁拼、三十多岁收

财富最好在年轻时追求,因为精力旺、灵活、责任少、也更乐观。十几岁该学习和动手,二十多岁在竞技场里拼命,三十多岁开始收获(有网络、还有精力),四十多岁必须收获并且真正盯住健康,五十多岁回馈社会,六十多岁做哲学。罗马时代大致也是这个节奏。

自我审视:去找那个「我」,永远找不到

Naval 认为最有趣的抵达方式是「自我审视」——就是去找那个分离的自我。那个受苦的 Eric、自豪的 Eric、感觉好的 Eric、感觉糟的 Eric,躲在哪里?你越看越钉不住,它总在视野边缘,像旋转的火棍看起来像一个火轮。当你看够久,意识到目标从未存在,那些指向假目标的念头就会因为无用而平息。

幸福关系的秘诀是两个快乐的人

你无法「和配偶一起快乐」:要么他把你拖下去,要么你把他拖下去。所以每个人都要自己找到幸福,而幸福是私人的、必须各自去做的功课。关系里最糟的做法就是跑去跟对方说「振作起来,开心点」「你怎么了,为什么抑郁」——那不管用。先把自己家安顿好,才谈得上和别人建立真实关系。

04

时间线

  • 00:00开场:《Naval 宝典》五周年特别版,四小时对话剪成一集,从「幸福」这一章开始。
  • 01:18拆掉题目:幸福对不同人有不同含义,而 Naval 最新的想法是「根本没有幸福这种东西」。
  • 07:48冥想的真正目的:不是开悟,而是变得能自我观察,抓住心智在损害自己长期利益的那一刻。
  • 20:48那句推文:「保持健康,获得财富,追求真相,给予爱,创造美」——健康是底线,然后才谈别的。
  • 21:38现场插播推文:急性不快乐真实有用,慢性不快乐是一场自我的表演;身份越薄,越看得清现实。
  • 28:30人生的季节:二十多岁拼、三十多岁收、四十多岁盯住健康,五十多岁回馈,六十多岁做哲学。
  • 46:55自我审视:去找那个受苦、自豪、感觉好与感觉糟的「我」,你会发现它永远钉不住。
  • 58:22关系与收尾:幸福关系的秘诀是两个快乐的人;真相不可谈判,别再每年打勾、把事往后拖。
05

原话摘录

逐字命中原稿字幕,右侧时间戳可跳转。

“Stay healthy, get wealthy, seek truth, give love, and create beauty.”

保持健康,获得财富,追求真相,给予爱,创造美。

“acute unhappiness is real uh or is useful but chronic unhappiness is an ego trip”

急性不快乐是真实的、或者说是有用的,但慢性不快乐是一场自我的表演。

“The most important thing with getting wealthy and being happy is just realize you can do it. It's your choice.”

变富和变幸福最重要的一点,就是意识到你能做到。这是你的选择。

“These are unalloyed goods.”

这些是纯粹的好东西。

“the secret to a happy relationship is two happy people”

幸福关系的秘诀是两个快乐的人。

06

行动清单

  • {'text': '挑一件你反复咀嚼的旧怨,写下它的「客观版本」:对方的处境、他们的限制、你自己的选择各占多少。看看重新解释之后,你是否愿意放过自己。'}
  • {'text': '下次情绪上来时,把它拆成两层:身体感觉和念头。分别问一句——这个身体感觉本身真的那么难受吗?是谁在判定它难受?'}
  • {'text': '按「季节」给自己定位:现在该拼、该收,还是该修?只写下一件这个季节最该做的事,其余先搁置。'}
  • {'text': '列一张「义务清单」,删掉一件你只为不被评价而做的事(生日、婚礼、周年、节日打卡),把省下的时间给自己真正在乎的人。'}
  • {'text': '今天对一个你在乎的人,做一件只因为想做而做的事,不期待感谢、不暗示回报,也别训练对方说「谢谢」。'}
逐句对照 · 共 418 句 · 点击任意一句,视频从对应秒开始播放
00:00Hello and welcome. It's been 5 years since The Almanac of Naval first came out. And to honor that, Naval and I wanted to do a special edition for you.你好,欢迎。距离《Naval 宝典》首次出版已经五年了。为了纪念这件事,Naval 和我想为你做一期特别版。
00:10We spent the day together and recorded over 4 hours of our conversation. Now, we're sharing that here with you, updating and expanding the key ideas in the book. Like everything else in the Almanac of Naval, this version is being我们共处了一整天,录了四个多小时的对话。现在,我们把这段对话分享给你,更新并扩展了书里的核心观点。就像《Naval 宝典》里其他一切内容一样,这一版也是
00:23made available for free in addition to the audio book available on your favorite platform.免费提供的,此外还有你常用平台上的有声书。
00:30This book has grown as a word-of- mouth phenomenon being gifted and recommended ultimately reaching millions of people all over the world in 40 languages. I hope you will help these good ideas continue to spread. Now, thank you for这本书是靠口碑成长起来的,被人赠送、被人推荐,最终触达了全世界数以百万计的读者,被译成四十种语言。我希望你也能帮这些好想法继续传播。那么,谢谢你
00:43joining us. Let's dive in. Happiness. I really like the frame of it being a highly personal skill that can be learned like fitness or nutrition or as you we talked about wealth. Um, and that really seems like a very common thread加入我们。我们开始吧。幸福。我很喜欢这样一个框架:幸福是一种高度个人化的技能,可以像健身、营养,或者像我们谈过的财富那样被学会。嗯,而这似乎确实是一条很常见的线索
00:56of your ideas, like the combination of foundational principles and personal application.贯穿你的想法,就是基础原则与个人实践的结合。
01:04>> Yeah. I mean, look, happiness is it's one of those words that just means different things to different people.>> 是啊。我的意思是,你看,幸福就是那种对不同人有不同含义的词。
01:09Some people will say, I don't want to be happy. Other people will say, what do you mean I'm naturally unhappy or I'm naturally not happy? Everyone has an excuse or a reason or interpretation.有人会说,我不想幸福。另一些人会说,你什么意思,我天生就不快乐吗?每个人都有一个借口、一个理由或一种解释。
01:18It's such a personal topic, it's very hard for me to talk about. I mean, my latest thinking on it is like there's no such thing as happiness. Right?这是个太私人的话题,我很难谈。我的意思是,我最近的想法是:幸福这种东西根本不存在。对吧?
01:25And so I can give you 20 contradictory statements on it. Each one of them, you know, either you'll dismiss as a cliche or absurdity or will make you think.所以关于它我能给你二十句互相矛盾的话。每一句,你要么当成陈词滥调或胡说八道扔掉,要么它会让你想一想。
01:33Hopefully it'll make you think. Um, but my latest thinking on it is like, I don't really care about happiness and I'm not even sure it really exists. You know, happiness is a construct of the mind. It's an idea希望它会让你想一想。嗯,但我最近的想法是,我并不真的在乎幸福,我甚至不确定它真的存在。你知道,幸福是心智的建构。它是一个概念
01:44>> and it's a you have thoughts that say, "Oh, I'm happy now." And then when those thoughts are gone, what's going on? Are you unhappy or are you happy? There's there's nothing there. Right? This is the old Buddhist thing of like no self,>> 它是一种,你会有念头说「哦,我现在很幸福」。然后当那些念头消失了,发生了什么?你是不幸还是幸福?那里什么都没有。对吧?这就是佛教里那个古老的「无我」
01:58right? When you have a thought, that thought comes in. That thought claims to be the self. That thought emerges from somewhere from a an entity that we call the self that is very very poorly defined. And when you look for it对吧?当你有一个念头,那个念头进来了。那个念头宣称自己就是「我」。那个念头从某个地方冒出来,从我们称之为「自我」的一个东西里冒出来,而那个东西定义得极其模糊。当你去找它
02:09carefully, it's very hard to make out what the heck that thing is. So in that sense, happiness is just like the self is itself is just a thought. So happiness is just a thought and unhappiness is just a thought. And so仔细看的时候,你很难辨认出那到底是个什么东西。所以在这个意义上,幸福就像自我一样,它本身也只是一个念头。所以幸福只是一个念头,不幸也只是一个念头。于是
02:22you can have happy thoughts or you can have unhappy thoughts. And there's certain behaviors and mindsets that will lead towards more happy thoughts. And there are certain behaviors and mindsets that will lead to more unhappy thoughts.你可以有幸福的念头,也可以有不幸的念头。有些行为和心态会带来更多幸福的念头,也有些行为和心态会带来更多不幸的念头。
02:33However, if you identify with the thought, if you're like, I am that thought, it's me having that thought, then at that moment, you've created a mei that is happy while you're having that thought. And then when that thought但如果你认同那个念头,如果你觉得「我就是那个念头,是我在产生那个念头」,那么在那一刻,你就造出了一个「我」,在你产生那个念头时它是幸福的。然后当那个念头
02:44disappears, there's no me there anymore.消失时,那里就不再有一个「我」了。
02:46and there's no thought and there's no happy and then when the unhappy thought is there and you identify with it then you've created a thought that I'm unhappy and I'm having unhappy thought and that's me and I'm unhappy and then没有念头,也没有幸福;然后当不幸的念头出现,你认同它,你就造出了一个念头:我不幸,我在产生不幸的念头,那就是我,我不幸;然后
02:56when that thought disappears there's no one there and there's no thought and there's no unhappiness and then that whole construct is created through thoughts that are kind of coming and going in your mind and I even hesitate to say mind cuz like where is this mind当那个念头消失,那里没有人,没有念头,也没有不幸;整个构造都是通过在你心里来来去去的念头造出来的。我甚至犹豫该不该说「心里」,因为当你不去产生关于心的念头时,这个心在哪儿呢
03:09when you're not having a thought of the mind right it's like everything that we talk about here on this topic exists at the level of thought, but if you are not strongly into those thoughts or identify with those thoughts, then you're not当你没有关于心的念头时,对吧?就像我们在这个话题上谈的一切都存在于念头的层面,但如果你不强烈地陷入那些念头、不认同那些念头,你就
03:23going to have a concept of happy or unhappy. And there's certainly no happiness outside in the world.不会有幸福或不幸的概念。而外面的世界里当然也没有幸福。
03:30>> Both in very different meanings. One meaning is there's no happiness outside in the world cuz this is a mental construct you have internally. And so you can reinterpret your past, you can reinterpret your situation to often change those things or your habits. But>> 这两个意思很不一样。一个意思是,外面的世界里没有幸福,因为这是你在内部拥有的一种心智建构。所以你可以重新解释你的过去,重新解释你的处境,从而常常改变这些东西,或者改变你的习惯。但
03:43the second is that there's no happiness in the outside world and that the outside world is incredibly impermanent and it's out of your controls and there are always reasons to be unhappy for the outside world. The same way there's no第二个意思是,外部世界里没有幸福,外部世界极其无常,不受你控制,外部世界永远有让你不幸福的理由。同样,外部世界里也没有
03:55unhappiness in the outside world too.不幸。
03:57You're making that up in your mind cuz it's not going the way you want it to.那是你在心里编出来的,因为它没有按你想要的方式发展。
04:00>> Yeah.>> 是啊。
04:00>> And uh the world itself doesn't care.>> 而且,世界本身并不在乎。
04:03And that outside world can't make you any more unhappy than you let it. Now there are obvious exceptions to this.外部世界能让你多不幸,取决于你允许它到什么程度。当然,这有明显例外。
04:10Like if you're in physical pain, your body is unhappy. that will make your mind unhappy that will make you strongly identify with the pain and you will be unhappy right that's why in fact you could argue that the whole mind比如你身体疼痛时,你的身体是不幸的。那会让你的心不幸,会让你强烈地认同那份疼痛,你就会不幸。对吧?这其实正是为什么你可以说整个心智
04:20construct exists uh it's to feel that thing uh to to respond to pain you know one definition of love of pain is that uh pain demands a response >> right pain is a thing it's like pay attention to me right now drop what构造存在,就是为了感受那个东西,为了对疼痛做出反应。你知道,关于疼痛的一个定义是:疼痛要求回应。>> 对,疼痛是个东西,它在说:现在就注意我,放下你
04:35you're doing stop daydreaming pay attention to me right now and emotional pain is a variation on that >> um but so happiness and unhappiness These are these are very personal concepts. Um I would say my new thinking on this my latest thinking正在做的事,别做白日梦,现在就注意我。情绪上的痛苦是它的一种变体。>> 嗯,但幸福和不幸,这些都是非常私人的概念。嗯,我会说我对这事的新想法,我最新的想法
04:50subject to change. I'm not an enlightened being. I'm not a perpetually happy person. So it's literally just uh one person's personal exploration. U my latest thinking on this is that I don't necessarily want happiness. I kind of want just you know the zen thing of随时会变。我不是开悟的人,我不是一个永远幸福的人。所以这真的只是一个人的个人探索。我最近的想法是,我并不一定想要幸福。我某种程度想要的,是那种禅宗的
05:06being okay with things the way they are.对事物本来的样子感到安然。
05:09And I think it helps to be in that state when my desires are few and consciously chosen. Um when I am doing things for nonselfish reasons and that is selfish in a way. Like if I do things that are我觉得当我的欲望很少、并且是有意识选择的时候,更容易进入那种状态。嗯,当我做事出于非自私的理由——而那在某种意义上又是自私的。比如如果我做的事
05:24larger than myself, then I will be more okay with whatever the ultimate outcome is. Like for example, if I'm genuinely trying to make the world a better place, I'm not saying I am, but say I was Mother Teresa or some equivalent and I比我自身更大,那么无论最终结果如何,我都会更安然。比如,如果我真心想让世界变得更好——我不是说我做到了,但假设我是特蕾莎修女或类似的人
05:35was genuinely trying to make the world a better place. I wouldn't take it personally if the world wouldn't let me make it a better place, right? Because it's not a personal mission. The same way when like someone's doing it for God真心想让世界变得更好。如果世界不让我把它变得更好,我不会觉得这是针对我个人的,对吧?因为这不是一个个人使命。同样,当一个人为了上帝
05:47or someone's doing it for their children in a selfless way, it actually hurts less when you know things don't work out exactly the way that you want them to.或者为了孩子无私地做一件事,当事与愿违时,其实伤得没那么深。
05:55So having higher motives is helpful that way. You know, depressed people are ruminating upon themselves. They're really thinking about themselves. So not thinking about yourself is, you know, is helpful. Uh, you know, my simple tweet on this was the more you think about所以更高的动机在这方面是有帮助的。你知道,抑郁的人在反复咀嚼自己,他们真的在想自己。所以不去想自己是有帮助的。嗯,我关于这点的一条简短推文是:你越是想着
06:09yourself, the less happy you're going to be. It's that simple. Um, so, uh, I'm more interested in peace. Now, do I want peace all the time? I don't know. It seems kind of boring. There's one argument that boredom, this is a自己,你就越不幸福。就这么简单。嗯,所以我更感兴趣的是平静。现在,我想一直平静吗?我不知道。那似乎有点无聊。有一种论点认为,无聊——这是
06:24Schopenhau argument, that boredom reveals the emptiness of existence.叔本华式的论点——无聊揭示了存在的空虚。
06:29Because when you're not doing anything, when you're satisfied for one brief moment, all your desires are fulfilled, you're kind of just sitting around. What happens? Boredom shows up immediately.因为当你什么都不做,当你获得短暂的满足、所有欲望都被实现,你只是坐在那里。会发生什么?无聊立刻出现。
06:38Why? Because existence itself is somewhat empty. And so then you want to go and do something else. This is the pessimistic viewpoint. The optimistic viewpoint is actually that's the mind.为什么?因为存在本身在某种程度上是空的。于是你又会想去干点别的。这是悲观的视角。乐观的视角是:那其实是心智。
06:50Your mind is addicted to pleasure. And so it wants to jump up and go do something pleasurable because that's what it's used to. What may help to realize that the all problems are mind created for for good reason. I'm not你的心智对快乐上瘾,所以它想跳起来去做点快乐的事,因为它习惯了。有帮助的做法是意识到:所有问题都是心智造出来的,而且是有正当理由的。我不是
07:03saying the mind is a bad thing. It's there to protect your body, but we have a way of taking on problems that don't affect us. Politics is a good example.说心智是个坏东西。它在那里是为了保护你的身体,但我们有一种方式,会去承接那些并不影响我们的问题。政治就是一个好例子。
07:12You know, wars halfway around the war world or political parties or so on. And your your mind just picks up problems and desires that are just not important.你知道,地球另一端的战争,或者政党之类的。你的心就这样捡起一些根本不重要的问题和欲望。
07:22And so, yeah, if you're Buddha, you can live in no mind. But if you're a normal person, you can at least a rational person can find some level of peace by cultivating an in strategic indifference to things that are outside of their所以,是的,如果你是佛陀,你可以住在「无念」里。但如果你是个普通人,至少一个理性的人,可以通过对超出自己
07:35immediate control. Right? I've said this better in the past, but I'm I'm caveatting it a little bit now because I'm I'm actually reconstructing on the fly rather than quoting because I think you just have to catch yourself, right?直接控制范围之外的事物养成一种策略性的漠然,从而获得一定程度的平静。对吧?我过去把这点说得更好,但现在我加了点保留,因为我是现场重新组织而不是引用,因为我觉得你就是得抓住自己,对吧?
07:48The the purpose of meditation is not to get you enlightened. It's not going to do that. It's not even necessarily to make you happier immediately or to solve a problem or to calm you down. The purpose of meditation is just to become冥想的目的不是让你开悟。它做不到那个。它甚至不一定是为了让你立刻更幸福、解决某个问题,或者让你平静下来。冥想的目的只是变得
08:00self-observant. And when you're self-observant and more self-aware, you catch your mind doing things that are not in your long-term best interests.能自我观察。当你能够自我观察、更有自我觉察时,你会抓住自己的心智在做一些不符合你长期最佳利益的事。
08:10And then you can reset it or you can stop and say, "Is this true? Is this something I really want to go through?然后你可以重置它,或者停下来问:「这是真的吗?这是我真正想经历的吗?」
08:16Is this a really important desire? Is this something that I need to suffer over? What's easier? reinterpreting this or actually dealing with the underlying problem because we're always just picking up things to do. So anyway, you know, if I just wanted to be quote这是一个真正重要的欲望吗?这是我必须为之受苦的事吗?哪个更容易:重新解释这件事,还是真的去处理底层问题?因为我们总是在不断捡起事情来做。所以总之,你知道,如果我只是想当个所谓的
08:29unquote happy, right? Again, I'm not sure there's such a thing. Like if I wanted to be peaceful, then I would just do nothing, but I would get bored. Uh now, is that a problem? Yeah, I think that's a problem. I don't want to be「幸福」的人,对吧?再说一次,我不确定有这种东西。就像如果我想平静,那我就什么都不做,但我会无聊。那这是个问题吗?是的,我觉得这是个问题。我不想
08:40bored. Now, could I rise above the level of the mind and be like a zen monk?无聊。现在,我能超越心智的层面,像个禅僧一样吗?
08:44Maybe. But I also kind of like life, you know? I I like having certain gifts. I like uh self-actualizing. I like doing things. Um you know, let's say that the Buddhists are right, you know, and I am Brahman. Then why don't I just stay也许吧。但我也挺喜欢生活的,你知道?我喜欢拥有某些天赋。我喜欢自我实现。我喜欢做事。嗯,假设佛教徒是对的,而我就是梵。那我为什么不干脆就待在
08:58Brahman? Why did I come here? Right?梵里?我为什么来到这里?对吧?
09:00It's the age-old question. Why am I here? Right? And I think the only practical answer to why am I here is to do what I do. And so if I just do what I do without overthinking it, uh then it's这是个古老的问题。我为什么在这里?对吧?我觉得对「我为什么在这里」唯一实际的答案,就是去做我在做的事。所以如果我就去做我在做的事,不过度思考,那么它
09:15naturally going to lead me to a place of happiness. This is back to row row row your boat, right? It's gently down the stream. As long as I keep rowing and I'm doing gently, I'm kind of playing the自然会把我带到一个幸福的地方。这就回到那首「划呀划呀划小船」,对吧?轻轻地顺流而下。只要我一直在划,而且是轻轻地划,我就在玩那个
09:22game I'm meant to play.我注定要玩的游戏。
09:23>> Yeah. I think one of the things that is really that seem to resonate with people about this book is the combination of principles about wealth and happiness.>> 是啊。我觉得这本书真正让人产生共鸣的一点,是把关于财富和幸福的原则结合在了一起。
09:32Like so many people talk about one or the other, but never the tension, the contrast between the two. And I think what a lot of people sort of look to you to for and whether you consider yourself a good example of this or not, I'll be很多人只谈其中一个,却从不谈两者之间的张力与反差。我觉得很多人某种程度上把你当作一个参照,不管你自己觉不觉得自己是个好例子,我也会
09:43curious to hear is someone who's engaged but peacefully.很想听你说,一个既投入又平静的人。
09:48>> Yeah, I'm not sure I'm completely peaceful. Uh but definitely more peaceful than I used to be. I'm not as peaceful as a Zen monk. Uh but I'm probably way more peaceful than your average nervous founder. Uh some of it>> 是啊,我不确定自己完全平静。但肯定比以前平静多了。我没有禅僧那么平静。但我大概比一般焦虑的创始人平静得多。其中一部分
10:00is a it helps to have money. I'm not going to lie about it, right? Um, but I think I got more peaceful before I'd made a bunch of money. Um, and it was because I was actually in a very high原因是,有钱是有帮助的。我不会在这上面撒谎,对吧?嗯,但我觉得我变得平静是在赚到大钱之前。嗯,那是因为我当时正处在一个压力
10:09stress period and I just had to figure out how to deal with it.非常高的时期,我不得不想办法应对它。
10:12>> Uh, and I read some books, you know, Christian Morty and Osho and, uh, you know, yeah, I did some psychedelics, you know, like everybody else in the Bay Area. Uh, but not in a way where, you know, I think some people they do, they>> 嗯,我读了一些书,你知道,Christian Morty 和 Osho,还有,嗯,对,我也用过一些迷幻药,就像湾区其他人一样。但不像有些人那样——我觉得有些人他们
10:26go to Burning Man, they do their psychedelics, and they live for psychedelics. No, it's it's a it's a message. you get the message, you hang up the phone. Uh, and then I did a lot of meditation. Um, I did a lot of去火人节,用迷幻药,为迷幻药而活。不,它是一个信息。你收到信息,就挂断电话。嗯,然后我做了大量冥想,嗯,我做了很多
10:35reading. I did a lot of thinking. I did a lot of introspection. And I can't point to any single silver bullet. But all of it helped. It helps me be then and peaceful while I go about the thing, you know, not be阅读。我想了很多。我做了很多内省。我说不出任何单一的灵丹妙药。但所有这些都有帮助。它帮我在做事的时候保持平静,你知道,不至于
10:50miserable. Um, again, I kind of want the lazy man's solution to everything. So, I want the lazy man solution to enlightenment. I want the lazy man solution to wealth. I want the lazy mindset solution to art and creativity.痛苦。嗯,再说一次,我有点想要一切事情的懒人解法。所以我想要开悟的懒人解法。我想要财富的懒人解法。我想要艺术与创造力的懒人心法解法。
11:02And by lazy, I mean working on something that doesn't feel like work to me, right? So thinking doesn't feel like work to me. Thinking on the big questions, like it would be more work to not think about them than to think about所谓懒,我指的是做那些对我来说不像是工作的事,对吧?所以思考对我来说不像工作。思考那些大问题,不去想它们反而比去想它们更像工作。
11:13them. Right? If I'm pacing around late at night and it's midnight, I'm by myself. I will naturally start just pondering like what is this all about?对吧?如果我在深夜来回踱步,午夜时分,独自一人,我会自然地开始琢磨:这一切到底是怎么回事?
11:22You know, why how could you not be curious about your existence? Right? And I think we all just give up. We're just like, "Oh, yeah. Okay. There was a point where I was curious about my existence.你知道,你怎么可能对自己的存在不感到好奇呢?对吧?我觉得我们都只是放弃了。我们就像:「哦,对。好吧。曾经有一段时间我对自己的存在感到好奇。
11:31I got over that when I was a certain age. Uh, and now I'm just a monkey that's gonna, you know, do a bunch of things and then die."我在某个年纪就过了那个阶段。嗯,现在我就是一只猴子,会做一堆事,然后死掉。」
11:37>> I suppose it has fun. It depends whether you're having fun wrestling with those questions or whether you find them torturous.>> 我想这也挺有意思。取决于你在与这些问题搏斗时是否享受,还是觉得它们是折磨。
11:42>> I think they're inevitable. I think everybody wrestles with them. It's just not popular to acknowledge it.>> 我觉得它们是不可避免的。我觉得每个人都在与它们搏斗。只是公开承认这件事并不流行。
11:48>> Uh, I think by the contribution that I made to Twitter was not by doing something unique, but by being one of the first to do it. Um, you know, now there's a lot of accounts that frankly say the same things or different things>> 嗯,我觉得我对 Twitter 的贡献不是我做了多么独特的事,而是我是最早做这件事的人之一。嗯,你知道,现在有很多账号,坦白说在说同样的事,或者用非常
12:00in in very interesting ways. I was just early in doing that. And I I think people we draw boundaries in life, right? One of the reasons why Steve Jobs was to me the apotheiois of entrepreneurship was because he was not有趣的方式说不同的事。我只是做得早。而且我觉得,人们在生活里会划边界,对吧?史蒂夫·乔布斯在我看来是创业者的极致,原因之一是他不只是
12:14just a business person, but he was also an artist. And you know, he did LSD and talked about it and he did his meditation. He almost became a monk. Um, and he was a Zen Buddhist. Um so he also一个商人,他也是一个艺术家。你知道,他用过 LSD 并公开谈过,他也冥想。他差点成了僧侣。嗯,他是禅宗佛教徒。嗯,所以他也
12:26tried to solve everything in life uh all the big questions and you know I thought it through and kind of what I came back to is I had a recent tweet on this actually forget the exact wording of试图解决生活里的一切,所有大问题。你知道,我想透了这件事,最终回到的是——我最近发过一条相关的推文,其实我忘了那条推文的
12:34this tweet but I know the principles which is what's important the principles are first you have to stay healthy you're born healthy you don't finish healthy and so the longer you can drag that out the better right so that's why确切措辞,但我知道那些原则,这才是重要的。原则是:首先你得保持健康。你出生时是健康的,但你不会健康地走到最后,所以你能把这件事拖得越久越好,对吧?这就是为什么
12:46we're inspired by people like Brian Johnson or you know whoever your fitness guru is or health guru is you got to stay healthy that's the baseline then you want to get wealthy. You'd be lying if you said you don't want to be我们会被 Brian Johnson 这样的人激励,或者你心目中的健身大师、健康大师。你得保持健康,这是底线。然后你想变得富有。如果你说不想变富,那你是在撒谎。
12:57wealthy. Everyone wants at least some level of wealth, right? Maybe not. Uh, okay. Yeah, if you're virtue signaling socialism, maybe you don't want it. Or if you're, you know, don't want to be too high above your peers, you don't每个人都想要至少某种程度的财富,对吧?也许不是。嗯,好吧。对,如果你在道德表演社会主义,也许你不想要。或者如果你不想比同龄人高出太多,你就不
13:09want it. But you want some level of comfort and wealth. Yeah. You don't have to worry about money.想要。但你想要某种程度的舒适和财富。对,不必为钱发愁。
13:12>> Nobody wants less wealth. They don't want to go backward.>> 没人想要更少的财富。没人想倒退。
13:15>> That's right. And and you know, what's the old line? Uh, you know, money doesn't solve all your problems, but it solves all your money problems. So you want to solve all your money problems and then what remains right well every>> 没错。而且你知道那句老话吗?嗯,钱不能解决你所有的问题,但它能解决你所有关于钱的问题。所以你想把所有关于钱的问题解决掉,然后剩下的是什么?
13:27time I go around in circles on it I come back to just three things that I'm interested in and that is and it's going to sound cliched but I'll dive into them. It's truth, love and beauty. Uh and truth is just I want to know all the每次我在这上面绕圈子,最后都会回到我感兴趣的三件事。听起来会很老套,但我会深入讲。那就是真、爱和美。真就是:我想知道所有
13:42things that are true and I want to eliminate all the things that are false.真实的东西,我想消除所有虚假的东西。
13:46And uh I want to know all the things that are true on a spiritual level, on a philosophical level, on a scientific level, on a technological level, on a human nature level. Truth is permanent.而且我想知道所有真实的东西,在灵性层面、哲学层面、科学层面、技术层面、人性层面。真是永恒的。
13:56Truth is, you know, the closest thing to perfect. Truth has wide reach. Uh truth will make my life better. Even if it makes my life worse, I want to know the truth. It's very unique in that way.真,你知道,是最接近完美的东西。真有广阔的适用范围。真会让我的生活更好。即使它让我的生活更糟,我还是想知道真相。它在这方面非常独特。
14:05Truth and love are two things where even if it makes your life worse, you would still take them. like being and you know loving your kids even if it makes your life worse but makes them better off you真与爱是两样东西,即使它让你的生活更糟,你仍然会选择它们。比如爱你的孩子,即使这让你的生活更糟,但让他们过得更好,你
14:17want to love your kids because it feels good to be in love it feels fulfilling and truth even if the truth makes your life worse like if it turns out that yeah we are all Matrix brains in a bat愿意爱你的孩子,因为身处爱中感觉很好,感觉充实。真也是如此,即使真让你的生活更糟,比如如果发现我们确实都是泡在缸里的 Matrix 大脑,
14:27you know you still want to know that it's like in fact in the movie the Matrix you know Keanu Reed's character Neo he breaks out of the Matrix and Zion is worse than the Matrix it's a shitty existence the real city and there's你知道,你还是会想知道。事实上在《Matrix》这部电影里,Keanu Reeves 演的角色 Neo 冲出了 Matrix,而 Zion 比 Matrix 更糟,那是个糟糕的生存环境,那座真实的城市。还有
14:38another guy uh I forget the name >> Cipher >> was that >> Cipher >> Cipher Yeah, Cipher. Cipher wants to go back in the Matrix cuz he'd rather eat the fake steak and drink the fake wine.另一个人,嗯,我忘了名字 >> Cipher >> 是吗 >> Cipher >> Cipher,对,Cipher。Cipher 想回到 Matrix 里,因为他宁愿吃假牛排、喝假酒。
14:47But Cipher is a pathetic character.但 Cipher 是个可悲的角色。
14:49Cipher is a warning. Nobody says, "Oh yeah, I'm Cipher." Right? Everybody wants to be Neil because they know that you can't live a lie. So truth is super important and in everything that I do in every in little things and big things, ICipher 是一个警告。没人会说「哦对,我就是 Cipher」。对吧?每个人都想当 Neo,因为他们知道你不能活在谎言里。所以真超级重要,在我做的一切事里,每一件小事、大事里,我
15:01want to know the truth.都想知道真相。
15:02>> You did say that the closer you get to truth, the closer you get to peace.>> 你确实说过,你离真相越近,就越接近平静。
15:06>> Yeah. I think the way I said is the closer you get to truth, the more silent you become inside. M >> so and that's deliberately chosen um because when you know what is true you suffer less and you spend less time>> 是啊。我记得我的说法是:你离真相越近,内在就越安静。>> 所以这是刻意选择的,嗯,因为当你知道什么是真的,你受的苦就更少,你花更少时间
15:19ruminating about falsehoods and most of the thoughts that are going through your mind are concerned with falsehoods and the Buddhists would argue that the ultimate falsehood is a notion of the self which is this very poorly defined partial physical partial mental反复咀嚼虚假的东西,而你脑中经过的大多数念头都与虚假有关。佛教徒会说,最终的虚假就是「自我」这个概念——那个定义极其模糊、部分是身体、部分是心智的
15:33construct that somehow persists across thoughts and just the more things you resolve as being true or false, the less mental chatter you should have. All the way to the point that like the super wise enlightened people are completely构造,它不知怎地跨念头持续存在。你把越多事情分辨为真或假,你的心里嘈杂就应该越少。直到那个程度:那些极有智慧的、开悟的人是完全
15:48silent inside because they've seen through the illusion of self and they have no they have no separate self, no separate persistent self experience. So if your mind is chattering less, that is a sign that you're heading in the right内在寂静的,因为他们看穿了自我的幻觉,他们没有独立的自我,没有独立的、持续存在的自我体验。所以如果你的心嘈杂变少了,那是个迹象,说明你正走在正确的
16:01direction. That said, I in my experience, your mind doesn't really chatter much less, but hopefully it it hopefully there's less anxiety. And this this happens in meditation. If you're doing meditation, you'll find that at least I find the first 20 minutes your方向上。话虽如此,以我的经验,你的心其实并不会真的安静很多,但希望焦虑会少一些。这在冥想中会发生。如果你在冥想,你会发现——至少我发现,前二十分钟你的
16:16mind goes berserk all over the place.心会到处乱窜、发疯。
16:18And then at some point it calms down and you're for about 30, 40, 50 minutes in, it's just blank and it's actually a very blissful state. Um, or it can be different depending on how you meditate, but it's certainly not going to be然后某个时点它安静下来,大概三四五十分钟的时候,它就是一片空白,那其实是一种非常喜乐的状态。嗯,或者会因你冥想的方式而不同,但它肯定不会像
16:30chattering as much. And a lot of that's cuz you're resolving problems. And a lot of your problems don't need real world resolutions. They just need to be acknowledged. One of the classic practices is when you have an emotion,之前那么嘈杂。其中很大一部分是因为你在解决问题。而你的很多问题并不需要现实世界的解决,它们只需要被承认。一个经典练习是:当你有一种情绪,
16:43when you have a strong feeling, you just pay attention to it and you deconstruct it and you're like, "Okay, there's a little feeling associated within the body. Is that bodily sensation actually unpleasant?" Not really. It's just like a hollowess in the chest, for example,当你有一种强烈的感受,你就去注意它,把它解构,然后说:「好,身体里有一点点相关的感受。那个身体感觉真的令人不适吗?」其实不是。比如它只是胸口的一种空落感,
16:56and doesn't feel that bad. And there's a thought associated with it. Well, is that thought unpleasant? Well, the thought itself can't feel pain. It's just that, you know. So, who's classifying as unpleasant? Well, you are. Well, what is you in that case?感觉也没那么糟。然后有一个与之相关的念头。那个念头令人不适吗?念头本身感受不到痛苦,只是那样。那么,是谁在把它归类为不适?是你。那么,在这种情况下,「你」是什么?
17:08It's just another thought. So, it's, you know, one thought of your saying, I don't want this other thought here and then associated with a bodily sensation.它只是另一个念头。所以,就是你的一个念头在说:我不想要这里这个别的念头,再关联上一种身体感觉。
17:16But really, when you deconstruct it, you you'll realize like unless there's an actual emergency, there's not a whole lot there. Um, and when you get good at doing that or when you sort of start seeing that game, it will help you get但真的,当你解构它,你会意识到,除非有真正的紧急情况,那里其实没多少东西。嗯,当你擅长做这件事,或者你开始看穿那个把戏,它会帮你
17:29through unpleasant situations. So, I had one very unpleasant situation a few years ago, uh, where I was extremely unhappy. Um, but I won't forget this. I there was also a part of me that was just watching that very unhappy part and度过不愉快的处境。几年前我遇到过一个非常不愉快的处境,嗯,我当时极度不快乐。嗯,但我不会忘记这一点:我身体里还有一部分,只是在旁观那个非常不快乐的部分,
17:42just being like, haha, you know, it's a little act you're putting on to feel important, but there's nothing actually here. There's like there there there's nothing is being attacked, nothing is being hurt.只是想着:哈哈,你知道,这是你在演的一出小戏,为了感觉自己重要,但这里其实什么都没有。就像,没有任何东西在被攻击,没有任何东西在受伤。
17:54You're not in physical pain, you know?你没有身体上的疼痛,你知道吧?
17:56It's just a situation that you're thinking through and you're you're conjuring up this deep unhappiness and you're creating a drama. You're you're creating a stage in a drama to feel important. And I think a lot of times when we're unhappy, we're just we're这只是一个你在思考的处境,而你在变出这份深深的不快乐,你在制造一场戏。你在搭一个舞台、演一场戏,为了感觉自己重要。我觉得很多时候我们不快乐,我们只是
18:08obsessed with this idea of feeling important. And it's back to this desire for permanence. We want to feel important. We want to feel permanence.痴迷于「感觉自己重要」这个念头。这又回到对永恒的渴望。我们想感觉自己重要。我们想感觉自己永恒。
18:15We don't want to feel our own mortality.我们不想感受到自己终将死去。
18:16There's truth and there's love and beauty, right? So those are the other two things where >> Oh yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And on love I would say that you know once once your health is taken care of once your有真,还有爱与美,对吧?所以那是另外两样东西。>> 哦对。对对对。而关于爱,我会说,一旦你的健康被照顾好,一旦你的
18:26material needs are taken care of you pursue truth love and beauty. We talked about truth. Love I think is important because people want to be loved because that helps them get over their mortality. It makes them feel a little物质需求被照顾好,你就去追求真、爱和美。我们谈过真。我觉得爱重要,因为人们想被爱,因为那帮他们跨过自己的必死性。那让他们感觉稍微
18:37safer. You know monkeys huddling in the dark around the campfire scared of scared of what's out in there in the woods. But one thing I've realized for myself is that it's better to be in love than to be loved. If somebody loves you安全一些。你知道,猴子们在黑暗中围着篝火挤在一起,害怕树林里有什么东西。但对我自己,我意识到一件事:去爱比被爱更好。如果有人太爱你,
18:49too much, like your mom's coming up and hugging you all the time or you know some girl or some guy is obsessed with you, like it can get a little clawing, right? It feels like it's a burden. You比如你妈总是过来抱你,或者某个女孩、某个男生对你着迷,那会变得有点黏人抓人,对吧?那感觉像是一种负担。你
18:57almost don't want that. But when you feel in love with somebody, that's when you're high. That's when you're elated.几乎不想要那个。但当你对某人有爱的感觉时,那才是你亢奋的时候。那是你欣喜若狂的时候。
19:03And so that's counterintuitive, but falling in love with someone or something is actually very beneficial to you. It does involve sacrifice. It involves risk. But I think that people who give up on love in their lives, you know, it's kind of a sad life, right?所以这有点反直觉,但爱上某个人或某件事,其实对你非常有益。它确实包含牺牲,包含风险。但我觉得那些在生活中放弃爱的人,你知道,那算是挺可悲的人生,对吧?
19:17You get too jaded too fast. You don't have to love people necessarily. You can love, you know, universe, God, animals, what have you. But everybody needs to find something in their life that they love more than themselves, their你太快就变得愤世嫉俗。你不一定非得爱人类。你可以爱宇宙、上帝、动物,随便什么。但每个人都需要在生活中找到某个自己爱它胜过爱自己的东西,他们的
19:29mission, their their family, their children, uh their religion. Otherwise, it's going to be a miserable life. And then lastly, you know, we are active creatures. So this is where I really diverge from all the Buddhas and all the使命、他们的家庭、他们的孩子,嗯,他们的宗教。否则,那会是一个悲惨的人生。最后,你知道,我们是主动的生物。这就是我和所有佛陀、所有
19:44Zen monks and so on. Yeah, the chop would carry water, but that's not human flourishing, right? This is where Deutsch comes in really helpful. We're universal explainers. We're meant to solve problems. We're meant to reverse entropy. We're meant to advance禅僧等等真正分歧的地方。是,砍柴挑水,但那不是人类的繁荣,对吧?这就是 Deutsch 特别有用的地方。我们是通用解释者。我们注定要解决问题。我们注定要逆转熵。我们注定要推进
19:56civilization in the universe and knowledge. And so we can create.宇宙中的文明与知识。所以我们可以创造。
20:00Creativity is our highest art form. So we should be creating. And you can be passive in the face of death and say, well, none of it matters. Or you can be active and say nothing matters. I'm just going to create the best thing. I'm创造力是我们最高的艺术形式。所以我们应该创造。面对死亡,你可以被动地说:好吧,这些都不重要。也可以主动地说:什么都不重要,那我就去创造最好的东西。我
20:11going to live the best life by your own definition. So I want to create things.要按你自己的定义活出最好的人生。所以我想创造东西。
20:15And what do you want to create? Well, how do you know something is worth creating? Well, it's it's beautiful.那你想创造什么?你怎么知道某样东西值得创造?嗯,它美。
20:20It's it's hard to vary. It has deep explanations and knowledge embedded inside of it. Um people want to use beautiful things. So you want to create beautiful things that convey emotion that people want to use. And to me,它难以被改动。它内部嵌着深刻的解释和知识。嗯,人们想使用美的东西。所以你想创造那种传达情感、让人想用的美的东西。而对我来说,
20:33that's why something like an iPhone is among the greatest works of art ever created because it is a beautiful object. It's like a piece of jewelry, but it's also incredibly useful. It embodies a lot of knowledge. It's very这就是为什么像 iPhone 这样的东西是人类创造过的最伟大的艺术品之一,因为它是一件美的物件。它像一件珠宝,但它同时也极其有用。它承载了大量知识。它非常
20:44hard to vary. And it did change the world for the better.难以被改动。而它确实让世界变得更好了。
20:48>> Yeah. The exact tweet was, "Stay healthy, get wealthy, seek truth, give love, and create beauty.">> 是啊。那条推文的原话是:「保持健康,获得财富,追求真相,给予爱,创造美。」
20:55>> That's it. That's what I want to do.>> 就是这样。那就是我想做的事。
20:57The one I want to tattoo on my eyelids is any moment where you're not having a great time, when you're not really happy, you're not doing anyone any favors. It's not like you're unhappiness is making anyone else better off. And I我想纹在眼皮上的那句话是:任何时候你过得不开心、你不是真的幸福,你都没有在帮任何人的忙。并不是说你的不快乐让其他人过得更好。而
21:10don't know why I don't know where it was modeled to me or, you know, if it's just me trying to take myself seriously, but like there's something about cultivating unhappiness that brings like seriousness to a situation. like especially as a我不知道为什么,不知道这是从哪里学来的,或者只是我自己想把自己当回事,但培养不快乐这件事,似乎会给一个情境带来某种严肃感。尤其是作为一个
21:24leader or a you know trying to take something seriously you sort of bring an unhappy version of yourself um I find and I know I know that's a mistake I should tweet this afterward this down >> uh tweet break领导者,或者你想认真对待某件事,你某种程度会带出一个不快乐的自己。嗯,我发现——而且我知道我知道这是个错误,我之后该发条推文记下来。>> 嗯,插播推文时间
21:38>> yeah tweet break acute unhappiness is real uh or is useful but chronic unhappiness is an ego trip >> right because chronic unhappiness is you just want to feel more you. You want to feel separate. You want to feel>> 对,插播推文:急性不快乐是真实的,或者说是有用的,但慢性不快乐是一场自我的表演。>> 对,因为慢性不快乐就是你只是想更多地感觉到「你」。你想感觉自己是分离的。你想感觉
21:58important. You know, you have an identity wrapped up in it. Like the thinner your identity, the more you can see reality because identity is what often stands between you and seeing reality the way it is. It's it's the自己重要。你知道,你在其中裹着一层身份认同。你的身份越薄,你越能看清现实,因为身份常常就站在你和「如实看见现实」之间。它是
22:09ultimate and motivated reasoning.终极的、有动机的推理。
22:11>> When something contradicts your identity, you're going to fight it.>> 当某件事与你的身份相冲突时,你会去对抗它。
22:15You're going to fight it with your life.你会拼了命去对抗它。
22:16You know, if if you're white and I say white people suck, like that's your identity right now. You're going to fight that. or black people suck, whatever, right? So, it's that's that's the problem with racism. Like, people can't change their identity. And so,你知道,如果你是白人,我说白人很烂,那此刻那就是你的身份,你会去对抗。或者说黑人很烂,随便什么,对吧?所以这就是种族主义的问题所在:人们无法改变自己的身份。于是,
22:27when you're racist, you make enemies out of them immediately. Um, and it creates warfare. So, you got to keep your identity thin. You don't want to choose your identity, right? Identity is like what you can't get away from. But any当你种族歧视时,你立刻就把他们变成了敌人。嗯,那就制造了战争。所以你得让自己的身份保持单薄。你不想去选择你的身份,对吧?身份就像是你摆脱不掉的东西。但任何
22:39chosen identity is a straight jacket.被选择的身份都是一件束身衣。
22:41It's locking you in. And that's true for happiness, but it's it's true for for truth. And here I would say like people who are unhappy like there was a time when it served them. I think I mentioned him earlier, William Glasser who was它把你锁在里面。这对幸福成立,但对真相也成立。而这里我会说,那些不快乐的人,曾经有一段时间那种不快乐对他们是有用的。我想我之前提到过他,William Glasser,他算是
22:56kind of my favorite psychologist type writer and he wrote a a series of really good books uh around something he calls choice theory. But one of his most controversial observations is that depression is really a choice or it's a我最喜欢的那类心理学家兼作家,他写了一系列非常好的书,围绕他称之为「选择理论」的东西。但他最具争议的观察之一是:抑郁其实是一种选择,或者它是
23:10series of choices that was made. It's a result of a series of choices that were made when you were a child that then became an unconscious habit and it's self-perpetuating. So when you were young, you know, as a as a baby, you一系列被做出的选择。它是一系列你小时候做出的选择的结果,那些选择后来变成了无意识的习惯,并且自我延续。所以当你小的时候,作为婴儿,你
23:20start out you're crying to get your parents attention and every time you cry, they come and they respond and then eventually you figure out actually with strangers crying doesn't work. It just forces them away. So you start smiling一开始通过哭来获得父母的注意,每次你哭,他们就过来回应。后来你发现,对陌生人哭其实没用,那只会把他们推开。于是你开始微笑,
23:30or you start communicating but eventually you run into situations where you're trying to get someone's attention whether it's your parents or your teachers or your peers and they won't give you the attention. So you cry internally. You signal that you you are或者你开始沟通。但最终你会遇到一些情况:你想获得某人的注意,无论是父母、老师还是同龄人,而他们不给你注意。于是你在内部哭泣。你发出信号,表示你
23:44so unhappy that you're willing to hurt yourself. And that's what depression is.是如此不快乐,以至于你愿意伤害自己。而这就是抑郁。
23:47It's hurting yourself through your own unhappiness and you start ruminating on it. And it may be effective for a little period of time. It pulls some people closer together and it can lead to a situation where you are now它是通过你自己的不快乐来伤害自己,然后你开始反复咀嚼它。它可能在一小段时间内有效。它把一些人拉得更近,而它可以导致这样一种局面:你现在
23:58unconsciously or subconsciously ending up depressed not realizing that this is a learned behavior. Now I'm not saying that there couldn't be a chemical component there. There obviously always is there chemical components to hunger there's chemical components to athleticism to intelligence you know不知不觉或下意识地最终陷入抑郁,而没意识到这是一种习得行为。我不是说那里不可能有化学因素。显然总是有化学因素——饥饿有化学因素,运动能力有化学因素,智力也有
24:15genetic components but you can make it worse and saying that it's all chemical imbalances doesn't explain anything.遗传因素,但你可以让它更糟。而说这全是化学失衡,什么也没解释。
24:22That's like saying like why are we here?那就像在问:我们为什么在这里?
24:23Well, it's because of particle collisions from the big bang, right?嗯,是因为大爆炸以来的粒子碰撞,对吧?
24:26It's too reductive. So, the explanation has to be offered at the same level as the question. So, when we say like, why am I unhappy? Forget the chemical imbalance. You're going to change your brain, right? And doing drugs will just这太还原论了。所以解释必须与问题处在同一层面。所以当我们说「我为什么不快乐」时,忘掉化学失衡。你打算改变你的大脑,对吧?而吃药只会在
24:38mess you up in other ways. Every person who takes like these long-term drugs on these things, they they end up giving up something else fundamental about themselves. Um, and hey, a lot of the best artists were crazy in other ways,别的方面把你搞乱。每个长期服用这类药物的人,最终都会放弃自己身上某些别的基本东西。嗯,而且,很多最好的艺术家在别的方面都很疯,
24:50right? So you don't want to average out your your mindset. So uh the depression may be the result of a series of bad choices that then became bad habits. And they do create an ego cuz they create a对吧?所以你不希望把自己的心智状态给平均化。所以,抑郁可能是一系列坏选择的结果,那些选择后来变成了坏习惯。而它们确实造出一个自我,因为它们造出一个
25:02separate identity of me. And then you start identifying with that me so much.分离的「我」的身份。然后你开始如此深地认同那个「我」。
25:06It's like well who else would I be?就像:不然我还能是谁?
25:08Well, I'm just an unhappy person. But that's also what makes me brilliant, makes me special and makes me interesting and makes me undiscovered and all that. So you can wrap a whole identity around it. And it's hard to好吧,我就是一个不快乐的人。但那也正是让我才华横溢、让我特别、让我有趣、让我未被发现等等的原因。所以你可以围绕它裹上一整套身份。而很难
25:18undo that identity because then you're like, well, what what makes me unique, but it's worth doing. By the way, this is like if you read Jed McKenna, right, spiritual atalysis, what is he doing?拆掉那个身份,因为那时你会想:那我凭什么独特?但这值得做。顺便说,这就像如果你读 Jed McKenna,对吧,灵性剖析,他在做什么?
25:28He's going through his whole identity and stripping it away.他在遍历自己的整个身份,把它一层层剥掉。
25:31>> I think he over dramatizes how painful that was. But it's kind of an interesting interesting method.>> 我觉得他把那过程有多痛给过度戏剧化了。但这算是个挺有意思的方法。
25:37>> That's a process that you went through.>> 那是你经历过的一个过程。
25:38>> No. No.>> 不。不。
25:39>> Deconstructing your identity?>> 解构你的身份?
25:40>> No. Yeah. Maybe a little bit. Not consciously. I mean I I just um I I don't think any of the techniques that anybody lays out will work for you. I don't think mental techniques work because the mind is infinitely>> 不。对,也许有一点。但不是有意识的。我的意思是,我只是,嗯,我不觉得任何人提出的任何技巧会对你有用。我不觉得心智的技巧有效,因为心智是无限
25:55complicated and capable of any thought and it's capable of reaching any point in mental space to any other point in mental space in one jump. Right? And because of that there's no pathway through another person's mind. So you复杂的,能产生任何念头,能在心灵空间里从一个点一跳到达任何另一个点。对吧?正因如此,没有一条能穿越另一个人心智的路径。所以你
26:10can be inspired by other people um but the right idea can change you in an instant whereas the wrong practice you know done 30 years every day will not make a difference.可以被别人启发,嗯,但正确的想法可以在一瞬间改变你,而错误的练习,你知道,每天做三十年也不会有任何区别。
26:20>> I mean through that frame it's it's a very optimistic way to look at you know someone who's unhappy someone who's chronically unhappy like there's no limit to how fast you can change or how positive that change could be.>> 我是说,从这个框架看,这是一个非常乐观的视角来看待一个不快乐的人、一个长期不快乐的人:你改变的速度没有上限,那个改变能有多正面也没有上限。
26:33>> That's right. The most important thing with getting wealthy and being happy is just realize you can do it. It's your choice. You can do both and you can be both and there's nothing wrong with trying to do both.>> 没错。变富和变幸福最重要的一点,就是意识到你能做到。这是你的选择。你可以两者都做,也可以两者都是,尝试两者兼得没有任何问题。
26:43>> The opening tweet of this whole section is uh the three big ones in life are wealth, health and happiness. We pursue them in that order but their importance is reversed.>> 这一整节的开场推文是:人生三件大事是财富、健康和幸福。我们按这个顺序追求它们,但它们的重要程度是反过来的。
26:53And I I was curious whether the order is should be pursued backwards or you think they're all like the optimal path is to sort of find balance and pursue them all in parallel.我一直好奇,这个顺序是不是应该倒过来追求,还是你觉得最优路径是找到平衡、并行追求它们全部。
27:04>> I I don't feel strongly about the order.>> 我对顺序没有强烈看法。
27:06I feel more strongly about the components, right? Um, you could pursue them in different orders. Like some people are just born happy, naturally happy, nothing destroys it. They're just always happy and that's the greatest gift, >> right? So that's why I think it is the我对各个组成部分的看法更强烈,对吧?嗯,你可以用不同顺序追求它们。有些人天生就快乐,天然快乐,什么都破坏不了。他们就是一直快乐,那是最伟大的礼物,>> 对吧?所以我觉得它是
27:19most important. Like even there's some people who will be unhealthy and they'll still be happy. They do exist and you know they're blessed. So if you can get that one, you're pretty much set. Um because the others are just attempted最重要的。甚至有些人身体不健康,但仍然快乐。他们确实存在,你知道,他们是有福的。所以如果你能拿到那一个,你基本就稳了。嗯,因为另外两个只是通往那两样东西的尝试性
27:31routes towards those two things or prerequisites for those two things. But if you don't need the other two as a prerequisite, if you're one of these magical people, then by all means, just go get happiness right away and be路径,或者那两样东西的前提条件。但如果你不需要另外两个作为前提,如果你属于那种神奇的人,那当然,直接去获得幸福、就去
27:40happy. Um, in terms of the wealth and health, yeah, I think the health is more important than the wealth. Ask any old unhealthy guy and they'll trade you a lot of money for getting their health back. Or it's the old Confucious line,幸福吧。嗯,就财富和健康而言,对,我觉得健康比财富更重要。去问任何一个年老不健康的人,他们会拿很多钱换回健康。或者那句孔子的老话,
27:52which I quoted before, but you know, um, a healthy manuh wants 10,000 things. A sick man only wants one thing. And it's very true. When you're sick, you'll, you know, you just want to get back up. So health is very important and then wealth我之前引用过,但你知道,嗯,健康的人想要一万样东西,生病的人只想要一样东西。这非常真实。你生病时,你知道,你只想重新站起来。所以健康非常重要,然后财富
28:07uh you know it solves all your material problems is also really important. I wouldn't give up any of the three to be honest. That said if you can only choose one you know happiness would be the number one but you shouldn't have to嗯,你知道,它解决你所有的物质问题,也很重要。说实话,这三样我一样都不会放弃。话虽如此,如果你只能选一样,你知道,幸福会是第一位,但你不应该非得
28:18choose one because you have three legs of a stool. Most people I think will want all three. And wealth is best pursued when you're younger just cuz you're higher energy. You're more flexible. You have less obligations.只选一样,因为你有凳子的三条腿。我觉得大多数人会想要全部三样。而财富最好在年轻时追求,因为那时你精力更旺、更灵活、责任更少。
28:28You're more malleable in terms of where you live and what you do and all that.在住哪里、做什么这些方面,你也更有可塑性。
28:30You're just more optimistic. You can pursue it later. It's just harder. You know what does that old song go? Like for everything there is a season. And you know, if you're in your teens, you should be learning and doing. If you're你就是更乐观。你也可以以后再去追求,只是更难。你知道那首老歌怎么唱的吗?凡事都有它的季节。你知道,如果你十几岁,你应该学习和动手做。如果你
28:41in your 20s, you probably want to be uh working very hard and in the arena, so to speak. In your 30s, you want to start harvesting. That's when you have your contacts and you still have a lot of二十多岁,你大概想非常努力地工作,可以说是在竞技场里。三十多岁,你想开始收获。那是你有关系网、同时还有很多
28:50energy. In your 40s, you definitely want to be harvesting. And this is where you really want to be watching your health and you better be getting happy by now cuz there's not enough time left. And then when you're in your 50s and you can精力的时候。四十多岁,你绝对应该在收获。而这也是你真正要盯住健康的时候,而且你最好到这时已经变得快乐了,因为剩下的时间不多了。然后当你五十多岁,你可以
28:59do your uh political gives backs and your uh you know contribution to society and be philanthropic and charitable and when you're 60s you can be a philosopher because enough experiences happen you've thought through enough things. So there is kind of a natural season to all these做你的政治回馈,以及你对社会的贡献,做慈善公益;当你六十多岁,你可以当哲学家,因为经历了足够多的事,你想透了足够多的东西。所以这一切都有某种自然的季节
29:14things. I think back in the Roman days I don't I don't read much about the history of Rome but my sense is in in olden times when you were in your teens you would study. when you were in your规律。我想在罗马时代——我读罗马史不多,但我的感觉是,在古时候,你十几岁会学习。当你
29:2420s is when you would go to war. When you were in your 30s, you would do your business. When you're 40s, you would serve in politics. And your 50s, you do your philosophy. Right? Something like something along those lines. Maybe a few二十多岁,你会去打仗。三十多岁,你做你的生意。四十多岁,你从政。五十多岁,你做你的哲学。对吧?大致是这样,类似这样。也许每个阶段
29:33years here and there in each each bucket. Um so there is a season for everything. So you want to get wealth first. Health is a grant for granted when you're young hopefully. Then you want to preserve your health as you get上前后差几年。嗯,所以凡事都有季节。所以你想先获得财富。年轻时健康大概是被视为理所当然的。然后随着年龄增长,你想保住你的健康。
29:45older. And then you better figure out how to get happy when you're, you know, at a certain point because you don't want to be that grumpy old person who's just getting angrier and bitter, more bitter and more cynical at the world as然后你最好在某个时点之前搞清楚怎么变得快乐,因为你不想到老了成为那种脾气暴躁的老人,随着年龄增长越来越愤怒、越来越苦、对世界越来越愤世嫉俗。
29:53you get older. We've all seen that in very old people. There's there's only two extremes that I see in old people.我们在很老的人身上都见过。我在老人身上只看到两个极端。
29:58They're either the ones who are fine with everything. You know, they've made their peace with the world and the ones who are bitter about everything, right?要么是那种对一切都无所谓的人,你知道,他们已经与世界和解;要么是对一切都很苦毒的人,对吧?
30:05Uh because we become more of ourselves in whatever direction we're in as we get older. CS Lewis talks about this where you know to him morality is you know and free will mean that every little action you make they compound and you are the嗯,因为随着变老,我们会在自己所在的方向上越来越成为自己。C.S. Lewis 谈过这个,对他来说,道德和自由意志意味着你做的每一个小动作都会累积,而你是
30:22product of 30 50 100 years of these compounding actions and you should take responsibility for each little action because it leads you closer to heaven or closer to hell and if you just keep making small bad decisions they lead to三十年、五十年、一百年这些累积动作的产物。你应该为每一个小动作负责,因为它让你更靠近天堂或更靠近地狱。如果你一直做小的坏决定,它们会导致
30:35medium-sized bad decisions lead to large bad decisions very hard to come back and you end up having a failed life. So yeah, I I think if you follow the season's philosophy, for everything there's a season. You start with wealth,中等大小的坏决定,再导致大的坏决定,很难回头,最后你的人生就失败了。所以是的,我觉得如果你遵循季节哲学——凡事都有季节——你从财富开始,
30:46you preserve your health and then you get happy. But the importance kind of is the reverse where the people who have who are just naturally happy, they have the greatest gift. They don't need the others. And the people who don't have你保住健康,然后你变得快乐。但重要程度某种意义上是反过来的:那些天生快乐的人拥有最伟大的礼物,他们不需要另外两样。而那些没有
30:57their health don't really care about their wealth. So that's why I kind of stand by the ordering, but I don't feel super strongly about it.健康的人,其实并不太在乎自己的财富。所以这就是我大致支持那个顺序的原因,但我对它的感觉并不特别强烈。
31:03>> Yeah. A failure mode that a lot of people fall into is they spend so much time pursuing wealth. They sacrifice happiness. They sacrifice health and then they find out way too late that they've way overshot, you know, their>> 是啊。很多人陷入的一种失败模式是:他们花太多时间追求财富,牺牲了幸福,牺牲了健康,然后发现得太晚——他们早就远远超过了
31:16their wealth bar. They've earned way more money than they need or they've just become the identity become too enshrined for them to change. And you know, >> yeah, I feel like the the the health part everybody figures out as they get自己的财富门槛。他们赚的钱远超所需,或者他们的身份变得太神圣化、无法改变。而且你知道,>> 是啊,我觉得健康这部分,每个人随着年龄增长都会想明白。
31:29older. Nobody wants to be less healthy.没人想变得不那么健康。
31:31Everybody wants to be healthier because the feedback loop and not being healthy is very tight. Pain demands a response and eventually the pain will show up. So everybody wants to be healthier and so I feel like people figure that out每个人都想更健康,因为不健康的反馈回路非常紧。疼痛要求回应,最终疼痛会显现出来。所以每个人都想更健康,我觉得人们会想明白这一点,
31:42especially once they get wealthy then you know they're they have more control over their time they can devote time uh to health and these days frankly you know you have GLOP once so people can lose weight and obesity was probably the尤其是当他们变富之后,你知道,他们对时间有更多控制,可以投入时间在健康上。而且说实话,现在有 GLP-1 之类的药,人们可以减重,而肥胖大概是
31:54biggest mass market driver of unhealthiness so that is being solved but the happiness one is a tough one a lot of people don't even believe it's possible I would say most of my contemporaries who have made a lot of最大的大众市场不健康驱动因素,所以那个问题正在被解决。但幸福这个很难,很多人甚至不相信它可能。我会说,我大多数赚了很多钱的同代人
32:06money they are not happy people and not even just not happy. They don't have an imagination that they can build their life on their own terms. They live very structured lives that are modeled after what they had in their youth and not并不是快乐的人,而且不只是不快乐。他们没有一种想象力去按自己的方式建造生活。他们过着非常有结构的生活,照搬他们年轻时所拥有的模式,而且不是
32:24necessarily in a good way. I would say they're in straight jackets like in terms of like, you know, kids are in school so I can't travel. You know, I don't I didn't hire help because, you know, we're supposed to do our own dish.以好的方式。我会说他们被束身衣困住,比如,你知道,孩子在读书所以我不能旅行。你知道,我没请帮手,因为,你知道,我们应该自己洗碗。
32:35These are like billionaires who who act like this, right? Um or they just they just don't think out of the box, right?这些是亿万富翁,却这样行事,对吧?嗯,或者他们就是不会跳出框框思考,对吧?
32:41They go to obligation obligatory meetings or functions or festivals or ceremonies that are just tedious. You know, it's like tedious meetings with tedious people, right? So I I just find too many of them are not able to hack他们去参加义务性的会议、活动、节庆或典礼,而那些只是乏味。你知道,就像和乏味的人开乏味的会,对吧?所以我发现他们中太多人无法像
32:58their life the same way they hack their career or hack their business. I mean hack a good way, right? But >> agency. Yeah.改造自己的事业或生意那样去改造自己的生活。我是指「hack」的好的一面,对吧?不过 >> 自主性,对。
33:03>> Agency. Yeah. They're low agency about the rest of their life. They're very high agency about their work. And then their mindsets and temperaments, they're just not naturally happy. They're not able to enjoy themselves. They're not able to have a good time. They're not>> 自主性,对。他们对自己生活的其余部分是低自主性的。他们对工作则是极高自主性的。然后他们的心态和性情,他们天生就不快乐。他们无法享受自己。他们无法过得开心。他们不
33:13genuinely enjoying what they're doing.是真心享受自己在做的事。
33:15Or they have tough family lives or tough relationships. All of which kind of is is downstream of your own mental well-being.或者他们的家庭生活艰难、关系艰难。所有这些都某种程度是你自己心理状态的下游产物。
33:22>> That's one of the things that sort of drew me towards everything that you had shared over, you know, in decades now is a sense of high agency over everything in life.>> 这也是吸引我去看你几十年来分享的一切的原因之一:一种对生活中一切的高自主性感。
33:32>> I have an amazing life.>> 我的人生很棒。
33:34If people knew how good my life was, I'd be run out of town. My life is really good. I mean, basically, at any given time during the day, I'm doing what I want to be doing. It's it's it's well如果人们知道我的生活有多好,我会被赶出城。我的生活真的很好。我的意思是,基本上一天中的任何时刻,我都在做我想做的事。它是经过
33:45thought through. It's considered. It's not obligatory.深思的。它是斟酌过的。它不是义务性的。
33:50It's designed such a way that it does keep very good authentic relationships with my family and the people that I care about. But I'm not doing anything I don't want to do. And I'm enjoying what I want to do. And if I'm not enjoying它被设计成那样:它确实让我与家人和我关心的人保持非常好的、真实的关系。但我不做任何我不想做的事。我享受我想做的事。如果我不享受
34:00it, I'm changing it very, very quickly.它,我会非常非常快地改变它。
34:02And yes, it is not living by anybody's rules. Like everything is built for me.而且是的,这不是按任何人的规则生活。就像一切都是为我量身建造的。
34:09>> You've called yourself lazy, but I think it's actually probably a focus on the effort to output ratio.>> 你说过自己懒,但我觉得那其实可能是对「投入产出比」的关注。
34:15>> Yeah. I I want the 8020 in everything. I want I want to actually I want the 95 99 one >> the fractal 8020.>> 是啊。我什么都想要 80/20。我想要——其实我想要那个 95/99 的 >> 分形的 80/20。
34:23>> Yeah, exactly. uh I want to get the most that I can while doing the least but in every aspect of my life and then you know open up more business and actually even among the philosophers like I love>> 对,正是。嗯,我想在生活的每个方面都以最少的付出获得最多的回报,然后你知道,再去开拓更多业务。而且其实即使在哲学家当中,我也喜欢
34:33Schopenhau because he's so truth oriented but he did not look like he was enjoying his life right whereas someone like in Osho even though he's a bit of a whack job and I don't agree with everything he says at least he was叔本华,因为他如此以真为导向,但他看起来并不享受自己的人生,对吧?而像 Osho 那样的人,虽然他有点疯,我也不完全同意他说的一切,但至少他
34:43enjoying his life >> oh was objectively enjoying his life is the orgies and 17 rolls or whatever is in the documentary >> you know he I don't agree with any of that but he was definitely having a good在享受他的人生 >> 哦,他客观上是享受人生的,就是纪录片里那些狂欢和十七辆劳斯莱斯之类的 >> 你知道,他,那些我一点也不认同,但他肯定是过得挺
34:54time. Uh, and it it's more interesting to me to listen to an Osho or Steve Jobs >> uh rather than somebody who was uh, you know, very successful or even a lighten but just seems der or down or miserable.开心的。嗯,对我来说,听 Osho 或史蒂夫·乔布斯讲话更有意思,>> 嗯,而不是听某个非常成功、甚至开悟了,但看起来只是阴郁、低落或痛苦的人。
35:10Yeah.对。
35:11>> Well, I think one of the sort of loadbearing pillars of the the happiness, you know, work, the happiness chapters, the happiness ideas is agency over perception >> or perception. agency over perception of of understanding that like there I mean>> 我觉得幸福那部分内容、幸福那些章节、幸福那些观点,其中一个承重支柱是对感知的自主权 >> 或者说感知。对感知的自主权,也就是理解到——我是说
35:25your tweet there are no external forces affecting your emotions like no matter what it feels like you can control how you interpret the things that are happening >> yeah there changing your interpretation of the past you don't store memories of你那条推文:没有任何外力在影响你的情绪,不管感觉如何,你都能控制自己如何解释正在发生的事 >> 对,改变你对过去的解释。你并不储存
35:36your past you store interpretations of memories of your past >> and so changing those interpretations or revisiting those interpretations can be painful but useful it requires a certain level of humility >> you know the ego is a thing that stands过去的记忆,你储存的是对过去记忆的解释 >> 所以改变那些解释,或者重新审视那些解释,可能很痛但有用,它需要一定程度的谦逊 >> 你知道,自我是一个挡在
35:48in the way the ego doesn't really exist it's just a concept, but uh the the the ego is just like you don't want to go through the painful thoughts of re-evaluating who you think you are and what you think makes you important. So,路上的东西。自我并不真的存在,它只是一个概念,但,嗯,自我就是:你不想要经历那些痛苦的念头,去重新评估你认为自己是谁、你认为什么让你重要。所以
36:00you're not willing to reexamine your past. Like let's say like for whatever reason, uh you know, you had conflict with your parents, right? And so now you have an identity and interpretation of your past where your parents were bad你不愿意重新审视自己的过去。比如说,不管什么原因,嗯,你知道,你和父母有冲突,对吧?于是现在你有一个身份和对过去的解释:你父母是坏
36:12people and you didn't get along with them and therefore you're the situation that you're in. It's their fault. Well, that's probably not true. It's probably keeping you away from your parents. It's probably making your life miserable.人,你和他们处不来,因此你才处在现在的处境里。那是他们的错。嗯,那大概不是真的。那大概让你远离了你的父母。那大概让你的生活痛苦。
36:24It's probably making them miserable. And then when you have kids, your kids don't have access to their grandparents. And the reality is, if you just went back and tried to be very objective, you know, neutral, and give them the benefit那大概也让他们痛苦。然后当你有孩子,你的孩子就没法接触他们的祖父母。而现实是,如果你回头去试着非常客观、中立,给他们善意
36:35of the doubt and realize they're genetically very similar to you. They just had different circumstances and they made the hard choices they had to make that perhaps it wasn't entirely their fault and perhaps you could be more charitable about it. And if you的推定,意识到他们在基因上和你非常相似。他们只是有不同的处境,他们做出了不得不做的艰难选择,也许那并不完全是他们的错,也许你可以对此更宽厚一些。如果你
36:46reinterpret that, then you could have an objectively better life with them. But it would require you to take the ego hit of no actually you weren't wrong. So that means some of the things that went wrong in your life were your own bad重新解释那件事,那么你和他们就能有一个客观意义上更好的人生。但那需要你承受自我的一击:不,其实你错了。也就是说,你人生中出问题的一些事是你自己的糟糕
36:59choices. Now seeing that truth might allow you to make better choices, but it does mean that you take a ego hit. You have to have painful thoughts. And this is where things like meditation or understanding the the nature of the self选择。看到这个真相也许能让你做出更好的选择,但它确实意味着你要承受自我的一击。你必须产生痛苦的念头。而这就是冥想、或者理解自我本性这类事
37:12help because you realize those thoughts aren't you. There's gonna be a bunch of pleasant thoughts. There be a bunch of unpleasant thoughts and there'll be a bunch of pleasant thoughts. Again, these are just thoughts. Thoughts don't actually have feelings. Thoughts don't有帮助的地方,因为你会意识到那些念头不是你。会有一堆愉快的念头,会有一堆不愉快的念头,然后又会有一堆愉快的念头。再说一次,这些只是念头。念头其实没有感受。念头不
37:21get hurt. Thoughts don't do anything.会受伤。念头什么也不做。
37:22Thoughts don't mean anything. And it helps to disconnect from it a little bit to be objective about it. So that's part of the process of meditation. By the way, it also happens in psychedelics where people will reinterpret their past念头没有任何意义。和它稍微解绑、对它保持客观,是有帮助的。所以那是冥想过程的一部分。顺便说,这在迷幻药里也会发生,人们会重新解释自己的过去,
37:32and they'll come out happier not knowing why, but the real reason is because they've worked through problems in the past and they've reinterpreted them. I think I did some of that. not not as a conscious deliberate exercise where I'm然后出来时更快乐,却不知道原因,但真正的原因是他们在过去的问题上做完了功课,重新解释了它们。我想我也做过一些这样的事。不是那种有意识、刻意的练习,让我
37:45like, well, I'm going to go through my past and reinterpret it, but it's just that when I was open-minded about it and I was like, I just want to know the truth or, you know, or or even like说「好吧,我要梳理我的过去并重新解释它」,而只是当我对此保持开放心态、我想「我只想知道真相」的时候,或者,你知道,甚至像是
37:53you're mentally suffering, you just want to get over it. You just want to get through it. You're sick of it. You're done with it, right? You're done with the suffering. Then it helps to objectively re-evaluate those thoughts >> or even just to let go of them if they你在精神上受苦,你只想走出来。你只想熬过去。你受够了,你不想再要了,对吧?你不想再受苦了。那时客观地重新评估那些念头就有帮助 >> 或者甚至只是放下它们,如果它们
38:08were, you know, the useful >> useful beliefs. Um, even if it's a like you can't let go of it being a correct or incorrect interpretation, like if it's useful to you for your future to reframe it.是,你知道,有用的 >> 有用的信念。嗯,即使,比如你放不下它是正确还是错误的解释这回事,如果为了你的未来而重构它对你是有用的,那也行。
38:20>> Yeah. That's what forgiveness is.>> 对。宽恕就是这个。
38:21Forgiveness is you forgive them because you reinterpret what happened. You're like, okay, maybe it wasn't entirely their fault, but another one is just like, it was their fault, but I still have to genuinely forgive them. This is hard, but I'm going to do it so that I宽恕是你重新解释发生了什么,从而原谅他们。你说:好吧,也许那并不完全是他们的错。但另一种情形是:那就是他们的错,但我仍然必须真心原谅他们。这很难,但我要这么做,好让
38:35can move on. So, it's not occupying my mind and my brain. Not I'm not sitting here spitting venom and blood and just feeling angry about the whole thing.自己能往前走。这样它就不再占据我的心和大脑。不是说我坐在这里吐毒吐血、对整个事情只是感到愤怒。
38:42Just feeling terrible because anger makes you miserable. Anger, you know, spikes your cortisol, gets your adrenal glands going, ages you, makes you feel bad. A lot of the vices and sins, the traditional ones, they make you feel bad. The punishment is directly on you.只是感觉很糟,因为愤怒让你痛苦。愤怒,你知道,会让你的皮质醇飙升,让你的肾上腺启动,让你衰老,让你感觉糟。很多恶习和罪——传统意义上的那些——都会让你感觉糟。惩罚直接落在你身上。
39:00You you you feel the burden of it immediately and so you get over it not because of them not to forgive them but to forgive but to just get out of your own mind to clear your own mind.你立刻感受到它的重负。所以你走出来,不是为了他们,不是为了原谅他们而原谅,而是为了从自己的心里出来、清空自己的心。
39:10>> Yeah. If you can't get yourself to forgive out of selflessness you might be able to out of selfishness. A thought experiment I like to play with is which human being if we can measure everyone's sort of neurochemical levels over a>> 对。如果你无法出于无私去原谅,你也许可以出于自私去原谅。我喜欢做的一个思想实验是:如果我们可以测量每个人在一个月或一年里的神经化学水平,哪个人类
39:24month or a year like which human on earth is experiencing the most subjective happiness and who is that person and where are they and how are they living what do they believe and you know what are their habits I think it's地球上正在体验最多的主观幸福?那个人是谁,他们在哪里,他们怎么生活,他们相信什么,你知道,他们的习惯是什么?我觉得很可能是
39:35highly likely that it's you know a religious plumber with a family of four or something volunteers >> well I mean one of one of the things that's amazing about the internet is that there are actual enlightened people out there一个信教的、有四口之家的水管工,或者某个做义工的人 >> 嗯,我是说,互联网了不起的一点是,外面真的有真正开悟的人
39:50>> and in the past they were inaccessible.>> 而在过去,他们是接触不到的。
39:53You know there was you go to remote mountaintop and you meet the Buddha.你知道,过去你得去遥远的山顶才能见到佛陀。
39:55>> They were a myth seems like.>> 他们看起来像是神话。
39:57>> Yeah. Mythologically you would encounter thousand people total in your life. What are the odds you're going to find the current living Buddha? Well now thanks to the internet there's dozens of them on YouTube on Twitter. There were a>> 对。在神话时代,你一生总共会遇到一千个人。你遇到当世活佛的概率有多大?而现在,多亏互联网,YouTube 上、Twitter 上有几十个。还有几个
40:07couple on air chat. I've met probably close to a dozen of them. I've interacted with them. I verified to my own satisfaction that they're enlightened after spending enough time around them and you know I learned from them. So these people exist. This is all在 Airchat 上。我大概见过接近一打这样的人。我和他们交流过。在他们身边待够长时间后,我以自己的标准验证了他们是开悟的,你知道,我从他们身上学习。所以这些人存在。这一切都是
40:20available. Like you can go find people who are they're not happy in a conventional dopamine pleasure sense but they're at peace at all times. Nothing bothers them. Like you know getting being told that they have catching get getting diagnosed with cancer to them is可及的。你可以去找那些人——他们不是那种传统多巴胺快乐意义上的幸福,但他们任何时候都处于平静。没有什么能打扰他们。比如,你知道,被告知得了癌症,对他们来说,
40:36will invite the same level of fear and happiness that getting a parking ticket would. like they're funny with it, you know, and so these people exist. They're completely approachable. You can even hire some of them as your personal coach所引发的恐惧和快乐程度,就跟收到一张停车罚单差不多。他们对此还挺幽默的,你知道。所以这些人存在。他们完全可接近。你甚至可以雇他们中的一些人当你的私人教练,
40:48or you can watch infinite YouTube videos with them. I mean, I can name you 15 of them right now.或者你可以看他们无穷无尽的 YouTube 视频。我是说,我现在就能给你点出十五个。
40:53>> Uh it'd be great if you name a couple.>> 嗯,你要是能点几个名字就太好了。
40:54>> Oh, I mean there are better known ones like Rupert Spir and Muji or on YouTube.>> 哦,我是说有些比较知名的,比如 Rupert Spira 和 Mooji,在 YouTube 上。
40:58You know, they're they're not famous.你知道,他们不算出名。
41:00There's a guy Nardinon who I spent a lot of time with. He's now semi famous. Uh he does Sidaya yoga. He's kind of more the classic guru type. There's personal friends I have. Steven Belchure who was on air chat with me. He's on Twitter有个叫 Nardinon 的人,我跟他相处了很久。他现在小有名气。嗯,他做 Sidaya yoga。他更接近那种经典的上师类型。还有我的私人朋友,Steven Belchure,他和我一起上过 Airchat。他也在 Twitter 上
41:13too. Uh James Pierce, >> you know, he's tweeted a lot. Uh Effortless Stoicism, Kapal Gupta, who I worked with in the past. There's Ascendor who's on YouTube. I tweeted him out recently. There's another guy who works as a waiter at some restaurant in嗯,James Pierce,>> 你知道,他发过很多推文。嗯,Effortless Stoicism、Kapal Gupta,我以前和他合作过。还有 Ascendor,在 YouTube 上。我最近发推提过他。还有另一个人,在
41:26the Midwest. I forget his name. I tweeted him out. There's Saja. There's so many of them. I mean, my YouTube is filled with them. And I've watched enough of their videos, listen, and I know that these are the real deal. These中西部某家餐厅当服务员。我忘了他名字。我发推提过他。还有 Saja。这样的人太多了。我是说,我的 YouTube 里全是他们。我看过足够多他们的视频、听过足够多,我知道这些是真货。这些
41:37are not fakers. Is it a palpable difference when you're in their in their physical presence?不是假货。当你亲身在他们面前时,那种差别是可感知的吗?
41:41>> No, there's no like fancy aura where you're going to be floating on cloud9.>> 不,没有什么花哨的光环让你飘在九霄云上。
41:45Uh I mean, a lot of that is hyperbole, but I think what you find is that they have the persistent experience of no self.嗯,我是说,很多那都是夸张,但我觉得你会发现的是,他们有持续不断的「无我」体验。
41:54>> They uh they see through the fact that the self is just a thought. It's a constructed identity and there's no one there to actually really get happy or unhappy. So because of that they now live basically as pure awareness or>> 他们看穿了这样的事实:自我只是一个念头。它是个被建构出来的身份,那里并没有一个人真的会变快乐或不快乐。所以正因如此,他们现在基本上作为纯粹的觉知
42:08consciousness and so they are essentially melded with their environment. They feel a sense of peace because your awareness is the one thing that's never changed about you your entire life. It is the one thing that is perfect and permanent in your life from或意识而活,所以他们本质上是与环境融为一体的。他们感到一种平静,因为你的觉知是你一生中唯一从未改变的东西。它是你生命中从生到死唯一完美而永恒的东西。
42:22birth to death. And they are no longer confused or think of themselves as a separate body mind construct. And so thing so nothing bothers them. That's kind of the common thing. And the way I usually figure them out out is I just而且他们不再困惑,不再把自己想成一个分离的身心构造。所以没有什么能打扰他们。这大概就是共同点。而我通常识别他们的方式是,我只是
42:34spend enough time around them that I see something genuinely bad happen to them.在他们身边待足够久,直到我看到某件真正糟糕的事发生在他们身上。
42:39You have to hang around long enough for something genuinely bad to happen to them and then you see their reaction and there's not even a perturbation and that's how you know.你得在他们身边待得够久,等到某件真正糟糕的事发生在他们身上,然后你看他们的反应——连一丝扰动都没有,这样你就知道了。
42:47>> Interesting.>> 有意思。
42:48And enlightened makes it seem >> enlightened is a super fancy word. I'm not sure there's such a thing.而「开悟」让它显得 >>「开悟」是个特别花哨的词。我不确定有这种东西。
42:54>> Well, it makes it seem binary. Is that but I I can't imagine that's how you see it.>> 嗯,它让它显得是二元的。是这样吗?但我无法想象你是这么看的。
42:58>> It is binary. It is binary because uh and this is a little counterintuitive.>> 它是二元的。它是二元的,因为,嗯,这有点反直觉。
43:02It's this not a path. It's not like a Osad Guru is another one by the way. Um I met a bunch of them. I I I should keep a list. I have a seekers list on Twitter which is open which tracks not它不是一条路径。顺便说,Osad Guru 也是其中一个。嗯,我见过一群这样的人。我应该列个名单。我在 Twitter 上有一个公开的求道者名单,它追踪的不一定
43:13necessarily enlightened people that has a couple of those on there, but also people who are working towards it. They care about it. They're genuine seekers.是开悟的人,上面有几个是,但也有一些正在朝那个方向努力的人。他们在乎这件事。他们是真正的求道者。
43:20That said, I'm not sure there's any such thing as progress because it's either you believe that you are a separate self or not. It's that simple. Not not even believe. Believe is the wrong word. You know, belief is not strong enough.话虽如此,我不确定有「进步」这回事,因为要么你相信自己是一个分离的自我,要么不是。就这么简单。甚至不是「相信」。相信是个错的词。你知道,信念不够强。
43:31Belief will not suffice. So either you know that you're a separate self or you know that you are not. Uh the reality is everyone's agnostic.信念不足以成事。所以要么你知道自己是一个分离的自我,要么你知道自己不是。嗯,现实是,每个人都是不可知论者。
43:39>> You know we there there are very few actual atheists and there are very few actual religious people. If you were actually religious, you' just be like, "Well, everything's in God's hands, so everything's fine." And if you were>> 你知道,真正的无神论者很少,真正的宗教徒也很少。如果你真的信教,你就只会说:「好吧,一切都在上帝手中,所以一切都好。」而如果你
43:50actually an atheist, you'd be like, "Well, none of this matters, so everything's fine." Right? But we're all agnostic. Do these people have like relationships and kids and >> Yeah, I it's it's actually that's a great question, right? Because you think真的是无神论者,你就只会说:「好吧,这些都不重要,所以一切都好。」对吧?但我们都是不可知论者。这些人有伴侣、有孩子吗?>> 对,这其实是个很好的问题,对吧?因为你想到
44:05of first of all, the word enlightenment is horrible. It implies that there's like some state that you end up in where everything is perfect and you're always happy. It's not the case at all. it's just that you disappear and all that's首先,「开悟」这个词很糟糕。它暗示有某种你最终会进入的状态,在那里一切都完美,你永远快乐。完全不是这样。只是你消失了,而剩下的
44:18like there's a great old uh philosophical puzzle uh called the philosophical zombie problem and I saw it referred to not it necessarily but he starts off with like what are consciousness and all that right what is consciousness for it's exactly that就像——有一个很棒的古老哲学难题,叫「哲学僵尸问题」,我看到有人提到它,不一定是指它,但他一开始就问,意识是什么之类的,对吧,意识是为了什么?正是这个
44:32question and the philosophical zombie problem basically says you know let's say you have to go through life you have to solve problems you you have to like react to the environment you have to think through things what do you need问题。哲学僵尸问题基本上是这么说的:你知道,假设你要过完一生,你要解决问题,你要对环境做出反应,你要把事情想清楚,那你需要
44:43consciousness for Why can't like there just be a robot doing all of that? Why do you need to have this conscious awareness? Cuz a robot could be reacting to stimuli, could be solving problems, could be doing all of those things.意识来干什么?为什么不能只是一个机器人在做这一切?你为什么需要有这个有意识的觉知?因为机器人也能对刺激做出反应,也能解决问题,也能做所有这些事。
44:54Consciousness is completely unnecessary.意识完全是多余的。
44:56And so the question is why consciousness? And this is a very western concept. Why consciousness? And all the enlightened people would tell you actually consciousness is the only thing there is. Everything appears in consciousness. It's made of consciousness and it disappears in所以问题就是:为什么有意识?这是个非常西方的概念。为什么有意识?而所有开悟的人都会告诉你:其实意识是唯一存在的东西。一切都在意识中显现,由意识构成,又在
45:11consciousness and it's seen by consciousness. There's nothing other than consciousness. You don't experience anything in the outside world. You just experience consciousness as consciousness. So that's all there actually is. And the actual consciousness observes everything including your body and your mind. So意识中消失,并被意识所看见。除了意识,没有别的东西。你在外部世界里并不体验任何东西。你只是以意识体验意识。所以那才是真正存在的一切。而真正的意识观察着一切,包括你的身体和你的心智。所以
45:24it's not your body. It's not your mind.它不是你的身体,也不是你的心智。
45:26It's its own thing and everything is made of it. So that's all that exists and that's all you are. So they would reverse the answer and say why zombie?它是它自己的东西,而一切都由它构成。所以那就是存在的一切,那就是你的全部。所以他们会把答案反过来,说:为什么要有僵尸?
45:34You know you're asking why consciousness? No. The answer is why zombie? There's no zombie. The zombie doesn't exist. There is no separate self. There's nothing else out there.你知道,你在问「为什么有意识」?不。答案是「为什么有僵尸」?没有僵尸。僵尸不存在。没有分离的自我。外面没有别的东西。
45:41And so this is a completely different frame on it. So in that sense, there is no enlightenment. There's no separate being to be enlightened. There's just life. There's just stuff happening. You know, there's just stuff happening.所以这是一个完全不同的框架。那么在这个意义上,没有开悟。没有一个分离的存在者去被开悟。只有生命。只有事情在发生。你知道,只有事情在发生。
45:51There are thoughts appearing. There are thoughts disappearing. They connect to each other. They talk to each other.有念头出现,有念头消失。它们彼此连接,彼此对话。
45:55They're valid. They exist. There are bodies. There are minds walking around.它们有效,它们存在。有身体,有心智在四处走动。
45:58And there is an awareness of those things. And you're basically a localized awareness. What you think you are is localized awareness. And this goes back to the oldest question that I think you know Robin and Marshy used to talk about而那些东西有一种觉知。而你基本上就是一个局域化的觉知。你所认为的自己,就是局域化的觉知。这又回到那个最古老的问题——我想 Robin 和 Marshy 以前常谈的
46:09is just who am I? The one thing that I think the the way the enlightened people again bad word get there is they have a persistent experience of no self and that becomes their new default. It is binary. It's not a it's not a pathway to就是:我是谁?我觉得那些开悟的人——又用了那个烂词——抵达那里的方式是:他们有一种持续不断的无我体验,而那成为他们新的默认状态。它是二元的。它不是一条通往
46:24it. And one of the ways that some of them get there some of them are just naturals almost born that way. Some of them they have a mystical experience.它的路径。他们中有些人抵达那里,有些人是天生的,几乎生来如此。有些人经历了一次神秘体验。
46:32Some of them they have a psychotic break. That's literally what a Krishna already had, right? Um he had this thing called the process which like kept coming back to him and it was just seems like a psychotic break plus his brother有些人经历了一次精神病性发作。Krishnamurti 经历的就是那个,对吧?嗯,他有这个叫「过程」的东西,不断回到他身上,那看起来就像一次精神病性发作,加上他的兄弟
46:42died and he went through a bad time. Um some people get there through meditation, you know, decades of meditation. Some people get there through just kind of devoting their life service to others like their self disappears. They see through it. But the去世了,他经历了一段糟糕的时期。嗯,有些人通过冥想到达那里,你知道,几十年的冥想。有些人通过把一生奉献给服务他人到达那里,他们的自我消失了,他们看穿了它。但
46:55the the one that I found the most interesting was they just do what's called self-examination. And self-examination is just looking for the self. Looking for this separate self.我觉得最有意思的一种是,他们只是做所谓的「自我审视」。而自我审视就是去寻找自我。寻找这个分离的自我。
47:06You're convinced you're Eric. I'm convinced I'm the wall. What do we mean by that? What is that? It was very fuzzy definition. What is that exactly? Find me this Eric that's constantly talking about himself, referring to himself.你确信你是 Eric。我确信我是 Naval。我们这么说是什么意思?那是什么?那是个非常模糊的定义。那到底是什么?把那个不断谈论自己、指涉自己的 Eric 给我找出来。
47:17Find me this Eric who suffers. Find me this Eric who feels pride. Find me this Eric who thrives. Find me this Eric who feels good. Find me this Eric who feels bad. Where is this guy hiding? Who is把那个受苦的 Eric 给我找出来。把那个感到自豪的 Eric 找出来。把那个茁壮的 Eric 找出来。把那个感觉好的 Eric 找出来。把那个感觉糟的 Eric 找出来。这家伙躲在哪里?这是
47:28this? Like look for that. And what you find is if you look look look look, you can never pin it down. It's always like it's always on the edge of your vision.谁?就去找那个。而你会发现,如果你看、看、看、看,你永远钉不住它。它总是像在你视野的边缘。
47:36It's what Alan once described as like you take a a burning stick and you whirl it around and it looks like you have a flaming wheel. You don't have a flaming wheel. What you have is you have a lot这就是 Alan 曾描述过的:你拿一根燃烧的木棍旋转,看起来你有一个火轮。你并没有一个火轮。你拥有的是很多
47:45of thoughts going around that convince you that there's this character in there called Eric. But there's no actual Eric.转来转去的念头,它们让你相信里面有一个叫 Eric 的角色。但并没有真实的 Eric。
47:51The self is just a thought. These are just thoughts that are happening that are convincing you there's someone there. So even when I'm speaking to you, there's words coming out and there's thoughts coming out. That's not me.自我只是一个念头。这些只是正在发生的念头,它们让你相信那里有一个人。所以即使我在对你说话,有词出来、有念头出来,那不是我。
48:02They're just flying out. I'm not controlling them. There's no separate me sitting there controlling them. And then for a moment, I felt sort of proud of how I said this and articulated to you.它们只是飞出来。我并不在控制它们。没有一个分离的「我」坐在那里控制它们。然后有那么一刻,我对自己说得这么好、表达得这么清楚,感到有点自豪。
48:12What is that feeling of pride? It's just a feeling. Who is that feeling referring to? It's not referring to anyone.那份自豪感是什么?它只是一种感觉。那份感觉指向谁?它不指向任何人。
48:18There's no one that's referring to. It's just another thought. That pride was just another thought without a target.没有一个被指向的人。它只是另一个念头。那份自豪只是另一个没有目标的念头。
48:23Well, if I keep looking for that target long enough, then maybe I'll finally realize actually the target doesn't exist. And then when that realize that target doesn't exist or that target has never existed. And if that target has如果我在那个目标上看得足够久,也许我最终会意识到:其实目标并不存在。然后当我意识到目标不存在,或者说目标从未存在过。而如果那个目标
48:34never existed, then eventually those thoughts that were going towards a fake target will start dying down because they're false. They're useless. That knowledge will no longer be replicated in my mind in a Deutschian sense. And then I will be at peace because I will从未存在过,那么最终那些指向一个假目标的念头会开始平息,因为它们是假的、无用的。用 Deutsch 的说法,那套知识不会再在我心里被复制。然后我就会处于平静,因为我会
48:47no longer have these egotistical emotions and ups and downs. And I'll realize there was never anybody here.不再有这些自我中心的情绪和起伏。而我会意识到,这里从来就没有任何人。
48:52And it was all just consciousness all along. And some people call that God.而一直以来,一切都只是意识。有些人把那称为上帝。
48:55>> It's going to take me a while to gra all that. But that's the point.>> 我需要一段时间才能把这一切消化。但这正是重点。
49:00>> Yeah. I mean, maybe I mean some people are very lucky. It happens for them right away. And most people never want it, so it's fine.>> 是啊。我是说,也许,有些人非常幸运,他们立刻就发生了。而大多数人从来不想它,所以也没关系。
49:07>> Yeah. Do you um they're truly enlightened people.>> 对。你觉得,嗯,他们真的是开悟的人吗。
49:11>> If you ask them like, you know, like I I've gone through this with all of them in different ways, but you know, I've tested them. I'm I'm kind of a a smartass about this, but I've tested them to see if they feel emotional pain>> 如果你问他们,你知道,我和他们每个人都以不同方式经历过这件事,但你知道,我测试过他们。我在这件事上有点自作聪明,但我测试过他们,看他们是否感受到情绪上的痛苦
49:23in any way, right?以任何方式,对吧?
49:25>> And my favorite way to test them like, well, >> you know, the best tests are subtle where they don't, you know, it's not obvious, but the one I like to ask them is, well, what if you weren't>> 我最喜欢的测试方式是,嗯,>> 你知道,最好的测试是微妙的,让他们察觉不到,你知道,不那么明显,但我喜欢问他们的是:那么,如果你没有
49:37enlightened? What if you lost your enlightenment? Or what if like you had never been enlightened? They're completely okay with that, right?开悟呢?如果你失去了你的开悟呢?或者如果你从未开悟过呢?他们对此完全无所谓,对吧?
49:45Because the truth doesn't change if you know it or not. And if you are not around to know the truth, if you don't exist in any separate sense, it doesn't matter if you know it or not.因为真相不会因为你知道或不知道而改变。而如果你不在那里知道真相,如果你不以任何分离的方式存在,那你知不知道都不重要。
49:54>> Yeah. And if it breaks under that question, then it was >> it was false.>> 对。而如果它在这个问题下崩了,那它 >> 那就是假的。
49:58>> It was part of your identity >> into the enlightenment.>> 那是你身份的一部分 >> 融进了开悟里。
50:00>> That's right.>> 没错。
50:01>> Yeah. Interesting.>> 对。有意思。
50:03>> But going back to your question about like can they uh still go about their lives and you know have girlfriends and and businesses and jobs. Yeah.>> 但回到你刚才的问题:他们还能不能过自己的生活,你知道,有女朋友、有生意、有工作。能。
50:11Absolutely they can. They they do actually. Some of the people that I mentioned, they have jobs, >> one of them is running a company, you know, um, one of them is like really good at dating, dates a lot, right? They绝对可以。他们确实是这样。我提到的那些人里,有些有工作,>> 其中一个在经营一家公司,你知道,嗯,其中一个特别擅长约会,约会很多,对吧?他们
50:24they just absolutely have full clarity of mind. They have fully functional bodies. They even have desires. Uh, and they even have wants and needs, but they're not egoic.他们绝对有完全清明的心智。他们有完全能运作的身体。他们甚至有欲望。嗯,他们甚至有想要的东西和需求,但它们不是自我中心的。
50:36That they're not wrapped up in a small sense of self that gets easily threatened and gets angry or gets like depressed or any of that. They'll take the actions that you and I would take, but they'll take them much more calmly他们不裹在一个狭小的自我感里,那种自我很容易被威胁、会生气、会抑郁之类的。他们会采取你我会采取的行动,但他们采取时平静得多,
50:50and they won't take anything personally.而且不会把任何事往心里去。
50:52So, they're still getting feedback from the environment. They're still reacting.所以,他们仍在从环境中获得反馈。他们仍在做出反应。
50:54And if anything, I would argue they're more capable than they ever were and their desires are more genuine. They're less mimedic. They're less status oriented. Now, are they less motivated than say someone like me? Yeah, I haven't met enlightened person who's as而且如果说有什么区别,我会说他们比以往任何时候都更有能力,他们的欲望更真实。他们更少模仿性。他们更少以地位为导向。那么,他们是否不如像我这样的人有动力?是的,我还没遇到过一个开悟的人像我
51:07motivated as me. On the other hand, I haven't met many people who are as motivated as me, right? Maybe I' I think I may have met like five people in my life who are more motivated. Right? So, it's it's hard to intersect that set.这么有动力。另一方面,我也没遇到过多少像我这么有动力的人,对吧?也许,我觉得我这一生大概遇到过五个比我更有动力的人。对吧?所以,这两个集合很难有交集。
51:21>> And would I take that trade, you know, being slightly less motivated for being a light? Sure. I was going to ask if you um having been so close if you're seeking that or if you feel like >> you know it's impossible not to seek it>> 那我愿不愿意做这个交换,你知道,动力稍微少一点,换取开悟?当然愿意。我本来想问,你,嗯,既然离得这么近,你是否在追求它,还是你觉得 >> 你知道,不可能不去追求它,
51:33even though I know that's a trap. It's like the shiniest of the shiny objects.即使我知道那是个陷阱。它就像最闪亮的那个闪亮之物。
51:37Like, you know, why would you want to start the next great company when you could be the Buddha, >> you know, when you could be God himself?就像,你知道,当你可以成为佛陀的时候,你为什么还要去创办下一家伟大的公司呢?>> 你知道,当你可以成为上帝本人的时候?
51:43Like, who are the greatest people in human history that everyone knows? It's Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha, you know, it's that bunch. It's not it's not even the Caesars of the world. Uh maybe the Einsteins, right? But essentially truth seekers. Truth seekers are the most就像,人类历史上大家公认的最伟大的人是谁?是耶稣、穆罕默德、佛陀,你知道,是那一批。甚至不是世界上的凯撒们。嗯,也许还有爱因斯坦们,对吧?但本质上都是求真者。求真者是最受
51:55revered and artists. History remembers artists and truth seekers. And the truth seeeking artists are the highest of them all, right? The daqing and so on. That said, it's another chase. It's another chase for something permanent. It's another chase for uh a shiny object.敬仰的,还有艺术家。历史记得艺术家和求真者。而求真的艺术家是其中最高的,对吧?达芬奇之类。话虽如此,那是另一种追逐。那是另一种对永恒之物的追逐。那是另一种对闪亮之物的追逐。
52:09It's a chase for things being different than they are. And the key thing about enlightened people is that they are fine with everything the way it is. And which includes not being fine with the way things are. They self-actualize.那是一种追逐「事物与现状不同」的追逐。而开悟者的关键之处在于,他们对一切本来的样子都安然。而这包括对事物现状不安然。他们会自我实现。
52:22>> They may self-actualize in more authentic ways that are different than how they would have self-actualized pre-enlightenment, but they still self-actualize. I'm really interested in the the ways in which you've broken these like false dichotoies, right? And you mentioned one just there, which is,>> 他们可能以更真实的方式自我实现,与开悟前的方式不同,但他们仍然自我实现。我对你打破这些虚假二分法的方式非常感兴趣,对吧?你刚才就提了一个,那就是,
52:38you know, the enlightened and unmotivated are potentially more effective. You know, you've gotten more effective as you've become happier, even though everyone has this fear of like, oh, if I become happy or if I accept what is, I'll be less productive.你知道,开悟而无动力的人可能更有效能。你知道,随着你变得更快乐,你也变得更有成效,尽管每个人都有这种恐惧:哦,如果我变得快乐,如果我接受现状,我会变得更没生产力。
52:54>> Yeah. What What would you rather battle?>> 是啊。你更愿意跟哪个作战?
52:57A terminator that is enlightened or a terminator that is wrapped in an ego.一个开悟的终结者,还是一个裹着自我的终结者。
53:01Terminator wrapped in ego is much easier to manipulate. Might have guilt, might have self-doubt, might have anger, will be less efficient. A term that is enlightened is a true terminator. You need to get away from that right away.裹着自我的终结者更容易被操纵。它可能有内疚、可能有自我怀疑、可能有愤怒,效率会更低。而一个开悟的终结者才是真正的终结者。你得马上远离它。
53:13>> It's interesting.>> 有意思。
53:14>> There is a place for emotions. Modern society is very safe. So a lot of the anger that we feel is derived from times when anger was there for physical violence or physical reasons. But we now take it on as mental. A lot of the>> 情绪有它的位置。现代社会非常安全。所以我们感受到的很多愤怒,来源于愤怒原本是为了身体暴力或身体原因而存在的时代。但现在我们把它当作精神层面的东西承受。很多
53:29modern suffering comes from we feel things chronically that were meant to be felt acutely for brief periods of time.现代的痛苦来自:我们把那些本该短暂、尖锐地被感受到的东西,变成了长期慢性地感受。
53:36So I I just I don't think you are less effective because you're happier. You will choose to do different things. So it may look like, oh, you're changing for the worse because you may look less motivated or motivated for a different所以我不觉得你因为更快乐就变得更低效。你会选择做不同的事。所以看起来可能像:哦,你在往坏的方向变,因为你可能看起来没那么有动力,或者动力指向了不同的
53:48thing, but you're motivated for something that is going to make you more effective while you're being happy. By the way, no one chooses to go back to being less happy.东西,但你的动力指向的是某件会让你在保持快乐的同时更有效能的事。顺便说,没人会选择回到不那么快乐的状态。
53:56Right. Yeah. No, it's just like money.对。是啊,不,这就像钱一样。
53:59No one chooses to go back to being poor.没人会选择回到贫穷。
54:01>> Strictly dominant strategy. Correct.>> 严格占优策略。没错。
54:02>> To become happy.>> 变快乐。
54:03>> That's right. These are strictly dominance and dominant strategies. These are unalloyed goods. So when people say, "I don't value happiness," that's just not true. That's not true through your own actions because every time you've been happy, you don't want to give that>> 没错。这些是严格占优、支配性的策略。这些是纯粹的好东西。所以当人们说「我不看重幸福」时,那根本不是真的。从你自己的行为看就不是真的,因为每次你快乐的时候,你都不想放弃那份
54:14up. And every time you do something that makes you a little bit happier, you're not going to give that up. Uh, you know, like one one of the things like as you kind of go through the progression of快乐。而每次你做某件事让自己稍微更快乐一点,你也不会放弃它。嗯,你知道,比如有件事,随着你走过人生的
54:23life, there's a point where you have roommates and then you get to like not having roommates, right? You don't want to go back to like the pre- roommate life, >> but then you have kids and you the worst进程,有一个阶段你有室友,然后你到了没有室友的状态,对吧?你不想回到没有室友之前的生活,>> 但然后你有了孩子,他们是最糟的
54:31roommates >> and the best. It kind of sucks when the kids grow up and leave too, right?室友 >> 也是最好的。孩子长大离开时也挺难受的,对吧?
54:36>> Um, you don't want to go back to uh commutes, you know, if you've had long commutes and then you get like start walking to work or having a short commute, it kind of sucks to go back to>> 嗯,你不想回到通勤的日子,你知道,如果你曾经长途通勤,然后开始走路去上班或者通勤很短,再回到通勤会挺难受。
54:44commutes. Um, retirement, you know, or or working for yourself. These are these are oneway doors. It's very hard to come back through those doors.嗯,退休,你知道,或者为自己工作。这些是单向门。很难再从那些门回来。
54:52>> I I asked about the enlightened people in their relationships because um a lot of people ask me what's something I disagree with you on I think as a test to see if I'm just a complete involved sophant. Um and actually one of the>> 我问开悟者在关系方面的情况,因为,嗯,很多人问我「你有什么不同意见」,我觉得那是在测试我是不是只是个彻底的马屁精。嗯,而其实其中一件
55:04things that I I wrestle with the most is this like you know only the individual ascends. all of your experiences are individual and like objectively I understand the correctness of the you know your perception as individual but I我一直最纠结的事是:你知道,只有个体独自上升。你所有的体验都是个体的,客观上说,我理解你作为个体感知的正确性,但我
55:16also know that so much of happiness like in my lived experience in research comes from our relationships with the people around us I have to imagine there's a lot of nuance there you can't control them but you are a participant in these也知道,在我亲身经历和研究中,幸福有很大一部分来自我们与周围人的关系。我不得不认为那里有很多细微之处。你无法控制他们,但你是这些关系中的
55:29relationships and they do affect your day-to-day happiness >> yeah we we we will disagree because I think that uh it's very difficult to be happy if you're bound wound up in needy relationships and just needing the relationship is needy. Now, obviously, I参与者,他们确实影响你日常的幸福感 >> 对,我们确实会分歧,因为我觉得,如果你被缠在需求感很强的关系里,很难快乐,而仅仅是「需要这段关系」本身就已经是需求感了。现在,显然,我
55:45have my family and I love them very much and they're very important to me, but I'm not going to stay in any relationship that makes me unhappy. I will do my duty. I'll fulfill my obligations. I'll take care of them even if they don't有我的家人,我非常爱他们,他们对我很重要,但我不会留在一段让我不快乐的关系里。我会尽我的责任。我会履行我的义务。我会照顾他们,即使他们不
55:59like me. But I'm not going to create stay sustain in a false relationship.喜欢我。但我不会去创造、停留或维持一段虚假的关系。
56:05And this is truth. Every relationship you're in, you're in because that person provides some value for you or because in in your identity you're tied up and you have some obligation towards them and that's fine. But like if if而这就是真相。你所处的每一段关系,你身处其中是因为那个人为你提供了某种价值,或者因为在你的身份里你被绑住了、你对他们有某种义务,那也没关系。但如果,比如
56:19literally your wife changed tomorrow, if she was inhabited by a demon who just did everything horrible to you, you would leave, right? So every relationship other than pure blood relationships which are different.字面意义上你的妻子明天变了,她被一个恶魔附身,对你做尽可怕的事,你会离开,对吧?所以除了纯粹的血缘关系——那不一样——每一段关系都是如此。
56:29They're on a genetic level. You know, you see your kids and you just go nuts in a good way. Every relationship is transactional. It does have a value exchange component. It does have an expectation of give and take. And it's血缘关系是在基因层面的。你知道,你看到你的孩子就,以一种好的方式,疯了一样。每一段关系都是交易性的。它确实有价值交换的成分。它确实有付出与索取的期待。而它
56:41kind of, you know, it sound good but not true, but false. And this this is this is where truth is hard. If truth was easy, everyone would do it, right? But this is where like these false relationships and these false某种程度,你知道,听起来很好但不真,是假的。而这就是真相难的地方。如果真相很容易,人人都会去做,对吧?但这就是那些虚假的关系和那些虚假的
56:52obligations are tough. So like I don't go to my friends birthdays unless I think the party is going to be fun. How do I go to weddings for example because I think you know largely there's just like enormous amounts of time taken out义务之所以难的地方。比如我不会去我朋友的生日,除非我觉得那个派对会好玩。再比如我怎么会去婚礼呢,因为我觉得你知道,那基本上就是占用了大量时间
57:02of your day you know of your week destination weddings oh my god right I don't go to like obligatory things like oh so and so is having an anniversary so and so is having a this thing you have从你的一天、你的一周里。目的地婚礼,天啊,对吧。我不去那些义务性的场合,比如「哦,某某要过周年纪念」「某某要办这个事」,你
57:13to go you know or the these people need you there for this f no that's like that's like where I draw the hard line no obligations and relationships drive you into obligations and then the obligations drive you into pain now.得去,你知道,或者「这些人需要你在场」之类的,不。那就是我划硬线的地方:不。义务——关系把你推入义务,然后义务把你推入痛苦。
57:27Now, now you're not having the pleasant part of the relationships. Now I'm left with in my life people who are similarly free, similarly low ego. We hang out all the time, but it's voluntarily. We all want to see each other and we're all然后,你就不再拥有关系中令人愉快的部分了。现在我的生活里留下的,是那些同样自由、同样低自我的人。我们经常在一起,但那是自愿的。我们都想见彼此,我们都
57:41being at our best to each other because we want to attract the other person. We don't take each other for granted, which is like the worst thing that can happen in a relationship. You have to invest into all your relationships because you在彼此面前展现最好的自己,因为我们都想吸引对方。我们不把彼此视为理所当然,而那大概是关系里能发生的最糟的事。你必须把所有关系都当作投资,因为你
57:50want to keep them alive. If you value them, you invest in them. But there's no false attachment. you know, it's the neediness that destroys a relationship or creates a fake relationship. Um, obviously to have family, you have obligations and you fulfill them. Uh,想让它们活着。如果你看重它们,你就投入其中。但没有虚假的依恋。你知道,是需求感摧毁了一段关系,或者造出一段假关系。嗯,显然,有家庭,你就有义务,而你履行它们。嗯,
58:05and I actually have I don't have a single estrange family member. Everyone everyone is in my life. Everyone in family. So, you know, it's not one of those your family is broken. We have to fix the world situations. The family is而其实我没有任何一个疏远的家人。每个人都在我的生活里。家里的每个人。所以,你知道,这不是那种「你的家庭是破碎的,我们得修复世界」的情况。这个家庭
58:16functioning really well. But at the same time, you have to be happy on your own.运作得非常好。但与此同时,你必须自己一个人也能快乐。
58:22You know, the secret to a happy relationship is two happy people. Okay?你知道,幸福关系的秘诀是两个快乐的人。好吗?
58:26Uh because you can't be happy with your spouse. They'll drag you down or you'll drag them down. Uh so it's important that each person find happiness. And happiness is personal. They each have to work on it. The the worst thing you can嗯,因为你无法「和配偶一起快乐」。他们会拖累你,或者你会拖累他们。所以重要的是每个人自己找到幸福。而幸福是私人的。他们各自都必须去做这件事。你在关系里能做的最糟的
58:38do in relationships is go to somebody else and say, "Cheer up being happy."事,就是跑去跟别人说「振作起来,开心点」。
58:41>> You know, what's wrong with you? Why are you depressed? It doesn't work right. So it has to be tackled at an individual level. And then once your own house is in order, then you can form genuine relationships with other people. But>> 你知道,「你怎么了?你为什么抑郁?」那没用,对吧。所以必须从个人层面着手。然后一旦你自己的家安顿好了,你才能和别人建立真实的关系。但
58:53putting relationships ahead of your own work and your own happiness, I think is a mistake. You will get neither.把关系放在你自己的工作和你自己的幸福之前,我觉得是个错误。你两样都得不到。
59:00>> I think that's a good formulation of like they are valuable and important.>> 我觉得那是个很好的表述:它们有价值,也重要。
59:04You want to pursue them in that order.你想按那个顺序去追求它们。
59:07And if I if I'm describing it correctly, your approach, you want them to be maximally truthful. Like you don't want to go into a relationship trying to make someone else happy. And I don't want them to do things to make me happy that如果我描述得对的话,你的做法是,你想让它们最大限度地真实。比如你不想进入一段关系是为了让别人快乐。我也不想让他们为了让我快乐而做那些
59:18are dishonest. I don't want them to, you know, feel like I'm a burden or an obligation. You know, like one of the issues I have is like uh as a parent like I do things, you know, for my kids不诚实的事。我不想让他们,你知道,觉得我是个负担或一项义务。你知道,我有的一个困扰是,嗯,作为父母,我为我的孩子做些事
59:30because I love them >> and people around me are always trying to train them to say thank you. They'll say, "Oh, you know, your dad gave you something. Did you say thank you?" I'm like, "Don't don't do that. Don't train因为我爱他们 >> 而我周围的人总想训练他们说谢谢。他们会说:「哦,你知道,你爸给了你东西,你说谢谢了吗?」我就说:「别,别这样。别训练
59:39them. They're not an animal." Like, if they genuinely feel gratitude, they'll come out in some way. I don't need it.他们。他们不是动物。」就像,如果他们真心感到感激,它会以某种方式流露出来。我不需要它。
59:45I'm not doing it for the gratitude.我做这些不是为了感激。
59:47Yeah.对。
59:47>> Right. And I don't want to train them like an animal. If they're genuinely thankful, it'll come out, you know? And if they're not, it won't. But don't don't don't force it. I don't I don't want any forced obligations relationship>> 对。而我不想把他们像动物一样训练。如果他们真心感激,它会流露出来,你知道?如果不是,就不会。但别,别强迫它。我不想任何被强加的义务关系,
59:59in either direction.两个方向都不想要。
1:00:00>> Yeah.>> 对。
1:00:01>> The only relationships I I believe in are peer relationships. Like obviously people work for you, but even then you always want to treat them as much like a peer as you can given the circumstances.>> 我唯一相信的关系是平等的关系。比如显然有人为你工作,但即使那样,你也总想在情况允许下尽可能把他们当同辈对待。
1:00:11Uh because otherwise it ends up formalized. It ends up ritualistic. It ends up false. It ends up unhappy. Um, you know, where where do you find it's funny in if you go to an event like a wedding or you go to like a big party,嗯,因为否则它最终会形式化。最终会仪式化。最终会虚假。最终会不快乐。嗯,你知道,你会发现有趣的是,如果你去一个像婚礼这样的活动,或者去一个大型派对,
1:00:25a lot of times you'll find a lot of show about happiness, you know, people cheering. Yeah. You know, but like they're not the genuine article is rarely there, you know. The genuine happiness comes in smaller interactions that are more genuine and less forced.很多时候你会发现大量关于幸福的表演,你知道,人们在欢呼。对。你知道,但那不是真货,真货很少在那里。真正的幸福来自更小、更真实、更少强制的互动。
1:00:42Like if you're forced to wear a tux and you're forced to show up a certain time, then you're forced to listen to a speech, then you're forced to do a toast, then you're forced to go around and it's just like that's not what就像如果你被强迫穿燕尾服,被强迫在某个时间出现,然后被强迫听一段演讲,然后被强迫去敬酒,然后被强迫到处走,那就像——那不是
1:00:52actually makes you happy. If it was genuinely how it makes you what makes you happy, then you would be doing that every day. You'd be going to every party and every wedding and every bar mitzvah and everything you get invited to. But真正让你快乐的东西。如果那真的是让你快乐的方式,那你每天都会这么做。你会去每一个派对、每一场婚礼、每一个成人礼、每一个你被邀请的场合。但
1:01:01at some level, those things are tedious.在某种程度上,那些事很乏味。
1:01:02You're doing them for other people and they're doing them for you. Like who's doing it for themselves, right? So I I think like true celebration uh is a beautiful thing but it has been ritualized so much >> like Valentine's Day, having to send你做这些是为了别人,他们做这些是为了你。就像,谁是为了自己做的呢,对吧?所以我觉得真正的庆祝是美好的事,但它被仪式化得太厉害了 >> 比如情人节,必须送
1:01:17flowers, you know, Hallmark cards, all this stuff is ritualistic Uh real happiness is when you're genuinely grateful with somebody else and you know you do something kind for them because you just want to and you have to create花,你知道,贺曼贺卡,这一切都是仪式化的。嗯,真正的幸福是当你真心对某人心怀感激,你知道,你为他们做件善事只因为你想做,而你必须在生活中
1:01:32space for that in your life and you have to create situations where you feel it authentically for people to genuinely you know inspire that in you and I don't want anything ritualistic. I never want a card. I never want a you know a为它腾出空间,你必须创造一些情境,让你真实地感受到它,让人们真心地激起你心中的这种感觉。我不想要任何仪式化的东西。我从来都不想要一张贺卡。我从来不想要一个,你知道,
1:01:47ritualistic gift. I don't want a medal.仪式化的礼物。我不想要一枚奖章。
1:01:49I don't want an award. you know, all these things are useless.我不想要一个奖项。你知道,所有这些都没用。
1:01:53>> I was gonna ask you about, you know, helping people sort of find the the courage to be that truthful in their lives. But, you know, I think it just goes back to the long-term view like you know that the truth, even if it causes>> 我本来想问你,你知道,怎么帮人们在生活中找到那种勇气,去那样真实。但,你知道,我觉得这就回到长期视角:你知道,真相,即使它带来
1:02:07short-term pain of like, hey, I'm not I'm not going to do this to make you happy. I don't want you to do this just to make me happy is the best way to create this long term.短期的痛苦,比如「嘿,我不会为了让你们快乐而做这件事」「我不希望你只是为了让我快乐而做这件事」,这才是长期创造它的最好方式。
1:02:16>> That's absolutely true. But I think it's even deeper than that. It's that truth is non-negotiable.>> 完全正确。但我觉得它比那更深。它是:真相不可谈判。
1:02:20like find me a single person who says I don't want the truth. That's a rare person, right?就像,给我找一个说「我不想要真相」的人。那是很少见的人,对吧?
1:02:26>> Well, the express preference I think there's probably plenty of people living uh choosing to live lies.>> 嗯,明说的偏好嘛。我觉得大概有很多人选择活在谎言里。
1:02:30>> I think they don't want to disappoint other people >> and I think so we're all caught in this collective trap, >> right? Like one of the things co did that was good was it broke the collective trap of commuting,>> 我觉得他们是不想让人失望 >> 我觉得所以我们都困在这个集体陷阱里,>> 对吧?就像新冠做的一件好事,是它打破了通勤的集体陷阱,
1:02:42>> right? It legitimized work from home.>> 对吧?它让居家办公变得正当。
1:02:43Now some people might take it too far and they just checked out completely.现在有些人可能走得太远,他们干脆完全脱离工作。
1:02:46But overall it it broke society of its addiction of commuting to un unnecessary commuting to unnecessary meetings and that was good. So I think the same way like it would be good if we can break society of it addiction to pump and但总体来说,它打破了社会对通勤、对不必要的通勤、对不必要的会议的瘾,那是好事。所以我觉得同样地,如果我们能打破社会对排场和
1:03:01circumstance, >> right? like Valentine's Day, like that should be happening all the time with the person you love spontaneously and naturally instead of February 14th, everybody tries to get in the same overpriced restaurant and buys the same overpriced flowers and gives the same虚礼的瘾,那就好了,>> 对吧?比如情人节,那应该和你爱的人随时、自发而自然地发生,而不是在二月十四日,每个人都想挤进同一家定价过高的餐厅,买同样定价过高的花,送同样的
1:03:16overpriced checks the same box, right?定价过高的巧克力,同一个盒子,对吧?
1:03:18And if you don't feel like doing it naturally, then that means there's something wrong with your relationship that you should fix or you should move on to another relationship. But what's not the correct answer is to do this而如果你并不自然而然地想做这件事,那意味着你的关系有些问题,你应该修复它,或者你应该走向另一段关系。但错误的答案是去做这种
1:03:30falsehood of checking the box every year and kicking the can down the road. Just wasting everybody's time.每年打个勾的虚假动作,把事情往后拖。只是在浪费所有人的时间。

00:00Hello and welcome. It's been 5 years since The Almanac of Naval first came out. And to honor that, Naval and I wanted to do a special edition for you. We spent the day together and recorded over 4 hours of our conversation. Now, we're sharing that here with you, updating and expanding the key ideas in the book. Like everything else in the Almanac of Naval, this version is being made available for free in addition to the audio book available on your favorite platform. This book has grown as a word-of- mouth phenomenon being gifted and recommended ultimately reaching millions of people all over the world in 40 languages. I hope you will help these good ideas continue to spread. Now, thank you for

00:43joining us. Let's dive in. Happiness. I really like the frame of it being a highly personal skill that can be learned like fitness or nutrition or as you we talked about wealth. Um, and that really seems like a very common thread of your ideas, like the combination of foundational principles and personal application. >> Yeah. I mean, look, happiness is it's one of those words that just means different things to different people. Some people will say, I don't want to be happy. Other people will say, what do you mean I'm naturally unhappy or I'm naturally not happy? Everyone has an excuse or a reason or interpretation.

01:18It's such a personal topic, it's very hard for me to talk about. I mean, my latest thinking on it is like there's no such thing as happiness. Right? And so I can give you 20 contradictory statements on it. Each one of them, you know, either you'll dismiss as a cliche or absurdity or will make you think. Hopefully it'll make you think. Um, but my latest thinking on it is like, I don't really care about happiness and I'm not even sure it really exists. You know, happiness is a construct of the mind. It's an idea >> and it's a you have thoughts that say, "Oh, I'm happy now." And then when those thoughts are gone, what's going on? Are you unhappy or are you happy? There's there's nothing there. Right? This is the old Buddhist thing of like no self,

01:58right? When you have a thought, that thought comes in. That thought claims to be the self. That thought emerges from somewhere from a an entity that we call the self that is very very poorly defined. And when you look for it carefully, it's very hard to make out what the heck that thing is. So in that sense, happiness is just like the self is itself is just a thought. So happiness is just a thought and unhappiness is just a thought. And so you can have happy thoughts or you can have unhappy thoughts. And there's certain behaviors and mindsets that will lead towards more happy thoughts. And there are certain behaviors and mindsets that will lead to more unhappy thoughts.

02:33However, if you identify with the thought, if you're like, I am that thought, it's me having that thought, then at that moment, you've created a mei that is happy while you're having that thought. And then when that thought disappears, there's no me there anymore. and there's no thought and there's no happy and then when the unhappy thought is there and you identify with it then you've created a thought that I'm unhappy and I'm having unhappy thought and that's me and I'm unhappy and then when that thought disappears there's no one there and there's no thought and there's no unhappiness and then that whole construct is created through thoughts that are kind of coming and going in your mind and I even hesitate to say mind cuz like where is this mind

03:09when you're not having a thought of the mind right it's like everything that we talk about here on this topic exists at the level of thought, but if you are not strongly into those thoughts or identify with those thoughts, then you're not going to have a concept of happy or unhappy. And there's certainly no happiness outside in the world. >> Both in very different meanings. One meaning is there's no happiness outside in the world cuz this is a mental construct you have internally. And so you can reinterpret your past, you can reinterpret your situation to often change those things or your habits. But the second is that there's no happiness in the outside world and that the outside world is incredibly impermanent and it's out of your controls and there are always reasons to be unhappy for the outside world. The same way there's no

03:55unhappiness in the outside world too. You're making that up in your mind cuz it's not going the way you want it to. >> Yeah. >> And uh the world itself doesn't care. And that outside world can't make you any more unhappy than you let it. Now there are obvious exceptions to this. Like if you're in physical pain, your body is unhappy. that will make your mind unhappy that will make you strongly identify with the pain and you will be unhappy right that's why in fact you could argue that the whole mind construct exists uh it's to feel that thing uh to to respond to pain you know one definition of love of pain is that uh pain demands a response >> right pain is a thing it's like pay attention to me right now drop what

04:35you're doing stop daydreaming pay attention to me right now and emotional pain is a variation on that >> um but so happiness and unhappiness These are these are very personal concepts. Um I would say my new thinking on this my latest thinking subject to change. I'm not an enlightened being. I'm not a perpetually happy person. So it's literally just uh one person's personal exploration. U my latest thinking on this is that I don't necessarily want happiness. I kind of want just you know the zen thing of being okay with things the way they are. And I think it helps to be in that state when my desires are few and consciously chosen. Um when I am doing things for nonselfish reasons and that is selfish in a way. Like if I do things that are

05:24larger than myself, then I will be more okay with whatever the ultimate outcome is. Like for example, if I'm genuinely trying to make the world a better place, I'm not saying I am, but say I was Mother Teresa or some equivalent and I was genuinely trying to make the world a better place. I wouldn't take it personally if the world wouldn't let me make it a better place, right? Because it's not a personal mission. The same way when like someone's doing it for God or someone's doing it for their children in a selfless way, it actually hurts less when you know things don't work out exactly the way that you want them to.

05:55So having higher motives is helpful that way. You know, depressed people are ruminating upon themselves. They're really thinking about themselves. So not thinking about yourself is, you know, is helpful. Uh, you know, my simple tweet on this was the more you think about yourself, the less happy you're going to be. It's that simple. Um, so, uh, I'm more interested in peace. Now, do I want peace all the time? I don't know. It seems kind of boring. There's one argument that boredom, this is a Schopenhau argument, that boredom reveals the emptiness of existence. Because when you're not doing anything, when you're satisfied for one brief moment, all your desires are fulfilled, you're kind of just sitting around. What happens? Boredom shows up immediately.

06:38Why? Because existence itself is somewhat empty. And so then you want to go and do something else. This is the pessimistic viewpoint. The optimistic viewpoint is actually that's the mind. Your mind is addicted to pleasure. And so it wants to jump up and go do something pleasurable because that's what it's used to. What may help to realize that the all problems are mind created for for good reason. I'm not saying the mind is a bad thing. It's there to protect your body, but we have a way of taking on problems that don't affect us. Politics is a good example. You know, wars halfway around the war world or political parties or so on. And your your mind just picks up problems and desires that are just not important.

07:22And so, yeah, if you're Buddha, you can live in no mind. But if you're a normal person, you can at least a rational person can find some level of peace by cultivating an in strategic indifference to things that are outside of their immediate control. Right? I've said this better in the past, but I'm I'm caveatting it a little bit now because I'm I'm actually reconstructing on the fly rather than quoting because I think you just have to catch yourself, right? The the purpose of meditation is not to get you enlightened. It's not going to do that. It's not even necessarily to make you happier immediately or to solve a problem or to calm you down. The purpose of meditation is just to become

08:00self-observant. And when you're self-observant and more self-aware, you catch your mind doing things that are not in your long-term best interests. And then you can reset it or you can stop and say, "Is this true? Is this something I really want to go through? Is this a really important desire? Is this something that I need to suffer over? What's easier? reinterpreting this or actually dealing with the underlying problem because we're always just picking up things to do. So anyway, you know, if I just wanted to be quote unquote happy, right? Again, I'm not sure there's such a thing. Like if I wanted to be peaceful, then I would just do nothing, but I would get bored. Uh now, is that a problem? Yeah, I think that's a problem. I don't want to be

08:40bored. Now, could I rise above the level of the mind and be like a zen monk? Maybe. But I also kind of like life, you know? I I like having certain gifts. I like uh self-actualizing. I like doing things. Um you know, let's say that the Buddhists are right, you know, and I am Brahman. Then why don't I just stay Brahman? Why did I come here? Right? It's the age-old question. Why am I here? Right? And I think the only practical answer to why am I here is to do what I do. And so if I just do what I do without overthinking it, uh then it's naturally going to lead me to a place of happiness. This is back to row row row your boat, right? It's gently down the stream. As long as I keep rowing and I'm doing gently, I'm kind of playing the

09:22game I'm meant to play. >> Yeah. I think one of the things that is really that seem to resonate with people about this book is the combination of principles about wealth and happiness. Like so many people talk about one or the other, but never the tension, the contrast between the two. And I think what a lot of people sort of look to you to for and whether you consider yourself a good example of this or not, I'll be curious to hear is someone who's engaged but peacefully. >> Yeah, I'm not sure I'm completely peaceful. Uh but definitely more peaceful than I used to be. I'm not as peaceful as a Zen monk. Uh but I'm probably way more peaceful than your average nervous founder. Uh some of it

10:00is a it helps to have money. I'm not going to lie about it, right? Um, but I think I got more peaceful before I'd made a bunch of money. Um, and it was because I was actually in a very high stress period and I just had to figure out how to deal with it. >> Uh, and I read some books, you know, Christian Morty and Osho and, uh, you know, yeah, I did some psychedelics, you know, like everybody else in the Bay Area. Uh, but not in a way where, you know, I think some people they do, they go to Burning Man, they do their psychedelics, and they live for psychedelics. No, it's it's a it's a message. you get the message, you hang up the phone. Uh, and then I did a lot of meditation. Um, I did a lot of

10:35reading. I did a lot of thinking. I did a lot of introspection. And I can't point to any single silver bullet. But all of it helped. It helps me be then and peaceful while I go about the thing, you know, not be miserable. Um, again, I kind of want the lazy man's solution to everything. So, I want the lazy man solution to enlightenment. I want the lazy man solution to wealth. I want the lazy mindset solution to art and creativity. And by lazy, I mean working on something that doesn't feel like work to me, right? So thinking doesn't feel like work to me. Thinking on the big questions, like it would be more work to not think about them than to think about

11:13them. Right? If I'm pacing around late at night and it's midnight, I'm by myself. I will naturally start just pondering like what is this all about? You know, why how could you not be curious about your existence? Right? And I think we all just give up. We're just like, "Oh, yeah. Okay. There was a point where I was curious about my existence. I got over that when I was a certain age. Uh, and now I'm just a monkey that's gonna, you know, do a bunch of things and then die." >> I suppose it has fun. It depends whether you're having fun wrestling with those questions or whether you find them torturous. >> I think they're inevitable. I think everybody wrestles with them. It's just not popular to acknowledge it.

11:48>> Uh, I think by the contribution that I made to Twitter was not by doing something unique, but by being one of the first to do it. Um, you know, now there's a lot of accounts that frankly say the same things or different things in in very interesting ways. I was just early in doing that. And I I think people we draw boundaries in life, right? One of the reasons why Steve Jobs was to me the apotheiois of entrepreneurship was because he was not just a business person, but he was also an artist. And you know, he did LSD and talked about it and he did his meditation. He almost became a monk. Um, and he was a Zen Buddhist. Um so he also

12:26tried to solve everything in life uh all the big questions and you know I thought it through and kind of what I came back to is I had a recent tweet on this actually forget the exact wording of this tweet but I know the principles which is what's important the principles are first you have to stay healthy you're born healthy you don't finish healthy and so the longer you can drag that out the better right so that's why we're inspired by people like Brian Johnson or you know whoever your fitness guru is or health guru is you got to stay healthy that's the baseline then you want to get wealthy. You'd be lying if you said you don't want to be

12:57wealthy. Everyone wants at least some level of wealth, right? Maybe not. Uh, okay. Yeah, if you're virtue signaling socialism, maybe you don't want it. Or if you're, you know, don't want to be too high above your peers, you don't want it. But you want some level of comfort and wealth. Yeah. You don't have to worry about money. >> Nobody wants less wealth. They don't want to go backward. >> That's right. And and you know, what's the old line? Uh, you know, money doesn't solve all your problems, but it solves all your money problems. So you want to solve all your money problems and then what remains right well every

13:27time I go around in circles on it I come back to just three things that I'm interested in and that is and it's going to sound cliched but I'll dive into them. It's truth, love and beauty. Uh and truth is just I want to know all the things that are true and I want to eliminate all the things that are false. And uh I want to know all the things that are true on a spiritual level, on a philosophical level, on a scientific level, on a technological level, on a human nature level. Truth is permanent. Truth is, you know, the closest thing to perfect. Truth has wide reach. Uh truth will make my life better. Even if it makes my life worse, I want to know the truth. It's very unique in that way.

14:05Truth and love are two things where even if it makes your life worse, you would still take them. like being and you know loving your kids even if it makes your life worse but makes them better off you want to love your kids because it feels good to be in love it feels fulfilling and truth even if the truth makes your life worse like if it turns out that yeah we are all Matrix brains in a bat you know you still want to know that it's like in fact in the movie the Matrix you know Keanu Reed's character Neo he breaks out of the Matrix and Zion is worse than the Matrix it's a shitty existence the real city and there's

14:38another guy uh I forget the name >> Cipher >> was that >> Cipher >> Cipher Yeah, Cipher. Cipher wants to go back in the Matrix cuz he'd rather eat the fake steak and drink the fake wine. But Cipher is a pathetic character. Cipher is a warning. Nobody says, "Oh yeah, I'm Cipher." Right? Everybody wants to be Neil because they know that you can't live a lie. So truth is super important and in everything that I do in every in little things and big things, I want to know the truth. >> You did say that the closer you get to truth, the closer you get to peace. >> Yeah. I think the way I said is the closer you get to truth, the more silent you become inside. M >> so and that's deliberately chosen um because when you know what is true you suffer less and you spend less time

15:19ruminating about falsehoods and most of the thoughts that are going through your mind are concerned with falsehoods and the Buddhists would argue that the ultimate falsehood is a notion of the self which is this very poorly defined partial physical partial mental construct that somehow persists across thoughts and just the more things you resolve as being true or false, the less mental chatter you should have. All the way to the point that like the super wise enlightened people are completely silent inside because they've seen through the illusion of self and they have no they have no separate self, no separate persistent self experience. So if your mind is chattering less, that is a sign that you're heading in the right

16:01direction. That said, I in my experience, your mind doesn't really chatter much less, but hopefully it it hopefully there's less anxiety. And this this happens in meditation. If you're doing meditation, you'll find that at least I find the first 20 minutes your mind goes berserk all over the place. And then at some point it calms down and you're for about 30, 40, 50 minutes in, it's just blank and it's actually a very blissful state. Um, or it can be different depending on how you meditate, but it's certainly not going to be chattering as much. And a lot of that's cuz you're resolving problems. And a lot of your problems don't need real world resolutions. They just need to be acknowledged. One of the classic practices is when you have an emotion,

16:43when you have a strong feeling, you just pay attention to it and you deconstruct it and you're like, "Okay, there's a little feeling associated within the body. Is that bodily sensation actually unpleasant?" Not really. It's just like a hollowess in the chest, for example, and doesn't feel that bad. And there's a thought associated with it. Well, is that thought unpleasant? Well, the thought itself can't feel pain. It's just that, you know. So, who's classifying as unpleasant? Well, you are. Well, what is you in that case? It's just another thought. So, it's, you know, one thought of your saying, I don't want this other thought here and then associated with a bodily sensation.

17:16But really, when you deconstruct it, you you'll realize like unless there's an actual emergency, there's not a whole lot there. Um, and when you get good at doing that or when you sort of start seeing that game, it will help you get through unpleasant situations. So, I had one very unpleasant situation a few years ago, uh, where I was extremely unhappy. Um, but I won't forget this. I there was also a part of me that was just watching that very unhappy part and just being like, haha, you know, it's a little act you're putting on to feel important, but there's nothing actually here. There's like there there there's nothing is being attacked, nothing is being hurt.

17:54You're not in physical pain, you know? It's just a situation that you're thinking through and you're you're conjuring up this deep unhappiness and you're creating a drama. You're you're creating a stage in a drama to feel important. And I think a lot of times when we're unhappy, we're just we're obsessed with this idea of feeling important. And it's back to this desire for permanence. We want to feel important. We want to feel permanence. We don't want to feel our own mortality. There's truth and there's love and beauty, right? So those are the other two things where >> Oh yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And on love I would say that you know once once your health is taken care of once your

18:26material needs are taken care of you pursue truth love and beauty. We talked about truth. Love I think is important because people want to be loved because that helps them get over their mortality. It makes them feel a little safer. You know monkeys huddling in the dark around the campfire scared of scared of what's out in there in the woods. But one thing I've realized for myself is that it's better to be in love than to be loved. If somebody loves you too much, like your mom's coming up and hugging you all the time or you know some girl or some guy is obsessed with you, like it can get a little clawing, right? It feels like it's a burden. You

18:57almost don't want that. But when you feel in love with somebody, that's when you're high. That's when you're elated. And so that's counterintuitive, but falling in love with someone or something is actually very beneficial to you. It does involve sacrifice. It involves risk. But I think that people who give up on love in their lives, you know, it's kind of a sad life, right? You get too jaded too fast. You don't have to love people necessarily. You can love, you know, universe, God, animals, what have you. But everybody needs to find something in their life that they love more than themselves, their mission, their their family, their children, uh their religion. Otherwise, it's going to be a miserable life. And then lastly, you know, we are active creatures. So this is where I really diverge from all the Buddhas and all the

19:44Zen monks and so on. Yeah, the chop would carry water, but that's not human flourishing, right? This is where Deutsch comes in really helpful. We're universal explainers. We're meant to solve problems. We're meant to reverse entropy. We're meant to advance civilization in the universe and knowledge. And so we can create. Creativity is our highest art form. So we should be creating. And you can be passive in the face of death and say, well, none of it matters. Or you can be active and say nothing matters. I'm just going to create the best thing. I'm going to live the best life by your own definition. So I want to create things.

20:15And what do you want to create? Well, how do you know something is worth creating? Well, it's it's beautiful. It's it's hard to vary. It has deep explanations and knowledge embedded inside of it. Um people want to use beautiful things. So you want to create beautiful things that convey emotion that people want to use. And to me, that's why something like an iPhone is among the greatest works of art ever created because it is a beautiful object. It's like a piece of jewelry, but it's also incredibly useful. It embodies a lot of knowledge. It's very hard to vary. And it did change the world for the better. >> Yeah. The exact tweet was, "Stay healthy, get wealthy, seek truth, give love, and create beauty."

20:55>> That's it. That's what I want to do. The one I want to tattoo on my eyelids is any moment where you're not having a great time, when you're not really happy, you're not doing anyone any favors. It's not like you're unhappiness is making anyone else better off. And I don't know why I don't know where it was modeled to me or, you know, if it's just me trying to take myself seriously, but like there's something about cultivating unhappiness that brings like seriousness to a situation. like especially as a leader or a you know trying to take something seriously you sort of bring an unhappy version of yourself um I find and I know I know that's a mistake I should tweet this afterward this down >> uh tweet break

21:38>> yeah tweet break acute unhappiness is real uh or is useful but chronic unhappiness is an ego trip >> right because chronic unhappiness is you just want to feel more you. You want to feel separate. You want to feel important. You know, you have an identity wrapped up in it. Like the thinner your identity, the more you can see reality because identity is what often stands between you and seeing reality the way it is. It's it's the ultimate and motivated reasoning. >> When something contradicts your identity, you're going to fight it. You're going to fight it with your life. You know, if if you're white and I say white people suck, like that's your identity right now. You're going to fight that. or black people suck, whatever, right? So, it's that's that's the problem with racism. Like, people can't change their identity. And so,

22:27when you're racist, you make enemies out of them immediately. Um, and it creates warfare. So, you got to keep your identity thin. You don't want to choose your identity, right? Identity is like what you can't get away from. But any chosen identity is a straight jacket. It's locking you in. And that's true for happiness, but it's it's true for for truth. And here I would say like people who are unhappy like there was a time when it served them. I think I mentioned him earlier, William Glasser who was kind of my favorite psychologist type writer and he wrote a a series of really good books uh around something he calls choice theory. But one of his most controversial observations is that depression is really a choice or it's a

23:10series of choices that was made. It's a result of a series of choices that were made when you were a child that then became an unconscious habit and it's self-perpetuating. So when you were young, you know, as a as a baby, you start out you're crying to get your parents attention and every time you cry, they come and they respond and then eventually you figure out actually with strangers crying doesn't work. It just forces them away. So you start smiling or you start communicating but eventually you run into situations where you're trying to get someone's attention whether it's your parents or your teachers or your peers and they won't give you the attention. So you cry internally. You signal that you you are

23:44so unhappy that you're willing to hurt yourself. And that's what depression is. It's hurting yourself through your own unhappiness and you start ruminating on it. And it may be effective for a little period of time. It pulls some people closer together and it can lead to a situation where you are now unconsciously or subconsciously ending up depressed not realizing that this is a learned behavior. Now I'm not saying that there couldn't be a chemical component there. There obviously always is there chemical components to hunger there's chemical components to athleticism to intelligence you know genetic components but you can make it worse and saying that it's all chemical imbalances doesn't explain anything.

24:22That's like saying like why are we here? Well, it's because of particle collisions from the big bang, right? It's too reductive. So, the explanation has to be offered at the same level as the question. So, when we say like, why am I unhappy? Forget the chemical imbalance. You're going to change your brain, right? And doing drugs will just mess you up in other ways. Every person who takes like these long-term drugs on these things, they they end up giving up something else fundamental about themselves. Um, and hey, a lot of the best artists were crazy in other ways, right? So you don't want to average out your your mindset. So uh the depression may be the result of a series of bad choices that then became bad habits. And they do create an ego cuz they create a

25:02separate identity of me. And then you start identifying with that me so much. It's like well who else would I be? Well, I'm just an unhappy person. But that's also what makes me brilliant, makes me special and makes me interesting and makes me undiscovered and all that. So you can wrap a whole identity around it. And it's hard to undo that identity because then you're like, well, what what makes me unique, but it's worth doing. By the way, this is like if you read Jed McKenna, right, spiritual atalysis, what is he doing? He's going through his whole identity and stripping it away. >> I think he over dramatizes how painful that was. But it's kind of an interesting interesting method.

25:37>> That's a process that you went through. >> No. No. >> Deconstructing your identity? >> No. Yeah. Maybe a little bit. Not consciously. I mean I I just um I I don't think any of the techniques that anybody lays out will work for you. I don't think mental techniques work because the mind is infinitely complicated and capable of any thought and it's capable of reaching any point in mental space to any other point in mental space in one jump. Right? And because of that there's no pathway through another person's mind. So you can be inspired by other people um but the right idea can change you in an instant whereas the wrong practice you know done 30 years every day will not make a difference.

26:20>> I mean through that frame it's it's a very optimistic way to look at you know someone who's unhappy someone who's chronically unhappy like there's no limit to how fast you can change or how positive that change could be. >> That's right. The most important thing with getting wealthy and being happy is just realize you can do it. It's your choice. You can do both and you can be both and there's nothing wrong with trying to do both. >> The opening tweet of this whole section is uh the three big ones in life are wealth, health and happiness. We pursue them in that order but their importance is reversed. And I I was curious whether the order is should be pursued backwards or you think they're all like the optimal path is to sort of find balance and pursue them all in parallel.

27:04>> I I don't feel strongly about the order. I feel more strongly about the components, right? Um, you could pursue them in different orders. Like some people are just born happy, naturally happy, nothing destroys it. They're just always happy and that's the greatest gift, >> right? So that's why I think it is the most important. Like even there's some people who will be unhealthy and they'll still be happy. They do exist and you know they're blessed. So if you can get that one, you're pretty much set. Um because the others are just attempted routes towards those two things or prerequisites for those two things. But if you don't need the other two as a prerequisite, if you're one of these magical people, then by all means, just go get happiness right away and be

27:40happy. Um, in terms of the wealth and health, yeah, I think the health is more important than the wealth. Ask any old unhealthy guy and they'll trade you a lot of money for getting their health back. Or it's the old Confucious line, which I quoted before, but you know, um, a healthy manuh wants 10,000 things. A sick man only wants one thing. And it's very true. When you're sick, you'll, you know, you just want to get back up. So health is very important and then wealth uh you know it solves all your material problems is also really important. I wouldn't give up any of the three to be honest. That said if you can only choose one you know happiness would be the number one but you shouldn't have to

28:18choose one because you have three legs of a stool. Most people I think will want all three. And wealth is best pursued when you're younger just cuz you're higher energy. You're more flexible. You have less obligations. You're more malleable in terms of where you live and what you do and all that. You're just more optimistic. You can pursue it later. It's just harder. You know what does that old song go? Like for everything there is a season. And you know, if you're in your teens, you should be learning and doing. If you're in your 20s, you probably want to be uh working very hard and in the arena, so to speak. In your 30s, you want to start harvesting. That's when you have your contacts and you still have a lot of

28:50energy. In your 40s, you definitely want to be harvesting. And this is where you really want to be watching your health and you better be getting happy by now cuz there's not enough time left. And then when you're in your 50s and you can do your uh political gives backs and your uh you know contribution to society and be philanthropic and charitable and when you're 60s you can be a philosopher because enough experiences happen you've thought through enough things. So there is kind of a natural season to all these things. I think back in the Roman days I don't I don't read much about the history of Rome but my sense is in in olden times when you were in your teens you would study. when you were in your

29:2420s is when you would go to war. When you were in your 30s, you would do your business. When you're 40s, you would serve in politics. And your 50s, you do your philosophy. Right? Something like something along those lines. Maybe a few years here and there in each each bucket. Um so there is a season for everything. So you want to get wealth first. Health is a grant for granted when you're young hopefully. Then you want to preserve your health as you get older. And then you better figure out how to get happy when you're, you know, at a certain point because you don't want to be that grumpy old person who's just getting angrier and bitter, more bitter and more cynical at the world as

29:53you get older. We've all seen that in very old people. There's there's only two extremes that I see in old people. They're either the ones who are fine with everything. You know, they've made their peace with the world and the ones who are bitter about everything, right? Uh because we become more of ourselves in whatever direction we're in as we get older. CS Lewis talks about this where you know to him morality is you know and free will mean that every little action you make they compound and you are the product of 30 50 100 years of these compounding actions and you should take responsibility for each little action because it leads you closer to heaven or closer to hell and if you just keep making small bad decisions they lead to

30:35medium-sized bad decisions lead to large bad decisions very hard to come back and you end up having a failed life. So yeah, I I think if you follow the season's philosophy, for everything there's a season. You start with wealth, you preserve your health and then you get happy. But the importance kind of is the reverse where the people who have who are just naturally happy, they have the greatest gift. They don't need the others. And the people who don't have their health don't really care about their wealth. So that's why I kind of stand by the ordering, but I don't feel super strongly about it. >> Yeah. A failure mode that a lot of people fall into is they spend so much time pursuing wealth. They sacrifice happiness. They sacrifice health and then they find out way too late that they've way overshot, you know, their

31:16their wealth bar. They've earned way more money than they need or they've just become the identity become too enshrined for them to change. And you know, >> yeah, I feel like the the the health part everybody figures out as they get older. Nobody wants to be less healthy. Everybody wants to be healthier because the feedback loop and not being healthy is very tight. Pain demands a response and eventually the pain will show up. So everybody wants to be healthier and so I feel like people figure that out especially once they get wealthy then you know they're they have more control over their time they can devote time uh to health and these days frankly you know you have GLOP once so people can lose weight and obesity was probably the

31:54biggest mass market driver of unhealthiness so that is being solved but the happiness one is a tough one a lot of people don't even believe it's possible I would say most of my contemporaries who have made a lot of money they are not happy people and not even just not happy. They don't have an imagination that they can build their life on their own terms. They live very structured lives that are modeled after what they had in their youth and not necessarily in a good way. I would say they're in straight jackets like in terms of like, you know, kids are in school so I can't travel. You know, I don't I didn't hire help because, you know, we're supposed to do our own dish.

32:35These are like billionaires who who act like this, right? Um or they just they just don't think out of the box, right? They go to obligation obligatory meetings or functions or festivals or ceremonies that are just tedious. You know, it's like tedious meetings with tedious people, right? So I I just find too many of them are not able to hack their life the same way they hack their career or hack their business. I mean hack a good way, right? But >> agency. Yeah. >> Agency. Yeah. They're low agency about the rest of their life. They're very high agency about their work. And then their mindsets and temperaments, they're just not naturally happy. They're not able to enjoy themselves. They're not able to have a good time. They're not

33:13genuinely enjoying what they're doing. Or they have tough family lives or tough relationships. All of which kind of is is downstream of your own mental well-being. >> That's one of the things that sort of drew me towards everything that you had shared over, you know, in decades now is a sense of high agency over everything in life. >> I have an amazing life. If people knew how good my life was, I'd be run out of town. My life is really good. I mean, basically, at any given time during the day, I'm doing what I want to be doing. It's it's it's well thought through. It's considered. It's not obligatory. It's designed such a way that it does keep very good authentic relationships with my family and the people that I care about. But I'm not doing anything I don't want to do. And I'm enjoying what I want to do. And if I'm not enjoying

34:00it, I'm changing it very, very quickly. And yes, it is not living by anybody's rules. Like everything is built for me. >> You've called yourself lazy, but I think it's actually probably a focus on the effort to output ratio. >> Yeah. I I want the 8020 in everything. I want I want to actually I want the 95 99 one >> the fractal 8020. >> Yeah, exactly. uh I want to get the most that I can while doing the least but in every aspect of my life and then you know open up more business and actually even among the philosophers like I love Schopenhau because he's so truth oriented but he did not look like he was enjoying his life right whereas someone like in Osho even though he's a bit of a whack job and I don't agree with everything he says at least he was

34:43enjoying his life >> oh was objectively enjoying his life is the orgies and 17 rolls or whatever is in the documentary >> you know he I don't agree with any of that but he was definitely having a good time. Uh, and it it's more interesting to me to listen to an Osho or Steve Jobs >> uh rather than somebody who was uh, you know, very successful or even a lighten but just seems der or down or miserable. Yeah. >> Well, I think one of the sort of loadbearing pillars of the the happiness, you know, work, the happiness chapters, the happiness ideas is agency over perception >> or perception. agency over perception of of understanding that like there I mean

35:25your tweet there are no external forces affecting your emotions like no matter what it feels like you can control how you interpret the things that are happening >> yeah there changing your interpretation of the past you don't store memories of your past you store interpretations of memories of your past >> and so changing those interpretations or revisiting those interpretations can be painful but useful it requires a certain level of humility >> you know the ego is a thing that stands in the way the ego doesn't really exist it's just a concept, but uh the the the ego is just like you don't want to go through the painful thoughts of re-evaluating who you think you are and what you think makes you important. So,

36:00you're not willing to reexamine your past. Like let's say like for whatever reason, uh you know, you had conflict with your parents, right? And so now you have an identity and interpretation of your past where your parents were bad people and you didn't get along with them and therefore you're the situation that you're in. It's their fault. Well, that's probably not true. It's probably keeping you away from your parents. It's probably making your life miserable. It's probably making them miserable. And then when you have kids, your kids don't have access to their grandparents. And the reality is, if you just went back and tried to be very objective, you know, neutral, and give them the benefit

36:35of the doubt and realize they're genetically very similar to you. They just had different circumstances and they made the hard choices they had to make that perhaps it wasn't entirely their fault and perhaps you could be more charitable about it. And if you reinterpret that, then you could have an objectively better life with them. But it would require you to take the ego hit of no actually you weren't wrong. So that means some of the things that went wrong in your life were your own bad choices. Now seeing that truth might allow you to make better choices, but it does mean that you take a ego hit. You have to have painful thoughts. And this is where things like meditation or understanding the the nature of the self

37:12help because you realize those thoughts aren't you. There's gonna be a bunch of pleasant thoughts. There be a bunch of unpleasant thoughts and there'll be a bunch of pleasant thoughts. Again, these are just thoughts. Thoughts don't actually have feelings. Thoughts don't get hurt. Thoughts don't do anything. Thoughts don't mean anything. And it helps to disconnect from it a little bit to be objective about it. So that's part of the process of meditation. By the way, it also happens in psychedelics where people will reinterpret their past and they'll come out happier not knowing why, but the real reason is because they've worked through problems in the past and they've reinterpreted them. I think I did some of that. not not as a conscious deliberate exercise where I'm

37:45like, well, I'm going to go through my past and reinterpret it, but it's just that when I was open-minded about it and I was like, I just want to know the truth or, you know, or or even like you're mentally suffering, you just want to get over it. You just want to get through it. You're sick of it. You're done with it, right? You're done with the suffering. Then it helps to objectively re-evaluate those thoughts >> or even just to let go of them if they were, you know, the useful >> useful beliefs. Um, even if it's a like you can't let go of it being a correct or incorrect interpretation, like if it's useful to you for your future to reframe it.

38:20>> Yeah. That's what forgiveness is. Forgiveness is you forgive them because you reinterpret what happened. You're like, okay, maybe it wasn't entirely their fault, but another one is just like, it was their fault, but I still have to genuinely forgive them. This is hard, but I'm going to do it so that I can move on. So, it's not occupying my mind and my brain. Not I'm not sitting here spitting venom and blood and just feeling angry about the whole thing. Just feeling terrible because anger makes you miserable. Anger, you know, spikes your cortisol, gets your adrenal glands going, ages you, makes you feel bad. A lot of the vices and sins, the traditional ones, they make you feel bad. The punishment is directly on you.

39:00You you you feel the burden of it immediately and so you get over it not because of them not to forgive them but to forgive but to just get out of your own mind to clear your own mind. >> Yeah. If you can't get yourself to forgive out of selflessness you might be able to out of selfishness. A thought experiment I like to play with is which human being if we can measure everyone's sort of neurochemical levels over a month or a year like which human on earth is experiencing the most subjective happiness and who is that person and where are they and how are they living what do they believe and you know what are their habits I think it's

39:35highly likely that it's you know a religious plumber with a family of four or something volunteers >> well I mean one of one of the things that's amazing about the internet is that there are actual enlightened people out there >> and in the past they were inaccessible. You know there was you go to remote mountaintop and you meet the Buddha. >> They were a myth seems like. >> Yeah. Mythologically you would encounter thousand people total in your life. What are the odds you're going to find the current living Buddha? Well now thanks to the internet there's dozens of them on YouTube on Twitter. There were a couple on air chat. I've met probably close to a dozen of them. I've interacted with them. I verified to my own satisfaction that they're enlightened after spending enough time around them and you know I learned from them. So these people exist. This is all

40:20available. Like you can go find people who are they're not happy in a conventional dopamine pleasure sense but they're at peace at all times. Nothing bothers them. Like you know getting being told that they have catching get getting diagnosed with cancer to them is will invite the same level of fear and happiness that getting a parking ticket would. like they're funny with it, you know, and so these people exist. They're completely approachable. You can even hire some of them as your personal coach or you can watch infinite YouTube videos with them. I mean, I can name you 15 of them right now. >> Uh it'd be great if you name a couple.

40:54>> Oh, I mean there are better known ones like Rupert Spir and Muji or on YouTube. You know, they're they're not famous. There's a guy Nardinon who I spent a lot of time with. He's now semi famous. Uh he does Sidaya yoga. He's kind of more the classic guru type. There's personal friends I have. Steven Belchure who was on air chat with me. He's on Twitter too. Uh James Pierce, >> you know, he's tweeted a lot. Uh Effortless Stoicism, Kapal Gupta, who I worked with in the past. There's Ascendor who's on YouTube. I tweeted him out recently. There's another guy who works as a waiter at some restaurant in the Midwest. I forget his name. I tweeted him out. There's Saja. There's so many of them. I mean, my YouTube is filled with them. And I've watched enough of their videos, listen, and I know that these are the real deal. These

41:37are not fakers. Is it a palpable difference when you're in their in their physical presence? >> No, there's no like fancy aura where you're going to be floating on cloud9. Uh I mean, a lot of that is hyperbole, but I think what you find is that they have the persistent experience of no self. >> They uh they see through the fact that the self is just a thought. It's a constructed identity and there's no one there to actually really get happy or unhappy. So because of that they now live basically as pure awareness or consciousness and so they are essentially melded with their environment. They feel a sense of peace because your awareness is the one thing that's never changed about you your entire life. It is the one thing that is perfect and permanent in your life from

42:22birth to death. And they are no longer confused or think of themselves as a separate body mind construct. And so thing so nothing bothers them. That's kind of the common thing. And the way I usually figure them out out is I just spend enough time around them that I see something genuinely bad happen to them. You have to hang around long enough for something genuinely bad to happen to them and then you see their reaction and there's not even a perturbation and that's how you know. >> Interesting. And enlightened makes it seem >> enlightened is a super fancy word. I'm not sure there's such a thing. >> Well, it makes it seem binary. Is that but I I can't imagine that's how you see it.

42:58>> It is binary. It is binary because uh and this is a little counterintuitive. It's this not a path. It's not like a Osad Guru is another one by the way. Um I met a bunch of them. I I I should keep a list. I have a seekers list on Twitter which is open which tracks not necessarily enlightened people that has a couple of those on there, but also people who are working towards it. They care about it. They're genuine seekers. That said, I'm not sure there's any such thing as progress because it's either you believe that you are a separate self or not. It's that simple. Not not even believe. Believe is the wrong word. You know, belief is not strong enough.

43:31Belief will not suffice. So either you know that you're a separate self or you know that you are not. Uh the reality is everyone's agnostic. >> You know we there there are very few actual atheists and there are very few actual religious people. If you were actually religious, you' just be like, "Well, everything's in God's hands, so everything's fine." And if you were actually an atheist, you'd be like, "Well, none of this matters, so everything's fine." Right? But we're all agnostic. Do these people have like relationships and kids and >> Yeah, I it's it's actually that's a great question, right? Because you think

44:05of first of all, the word enlightenment is horrible. It implies that there's like some state that you end up in where everything is perfect and you're always happy. It's not the case at all. it's just that you disappear and all that's like there's a great old uh philosophical puzzle uh called the philosophical zombie problem and I saw it referred to not it necessarily but he starts off with like what are consciousness and all that right what is consciousness for it's exactly that question and the philosophical zombie problem basically says you know let's say you have to go through life you have to solve problems you you have to like react to the environment you have to think through things what do you need

44:43consciousness for Why can't like there just be a robot doing all of that? Why do you need to have this conscious awareness? Cuz a robot could be reacting to stimuli, could be solving problems, could be doing all of those things. Consciousness is completely unnecessary. And so the question is why consciousness? And this is a very western concept. Why consciousness? And all the enlightened people would tell you actually consciousness is the only thing there is. Everything appears in consciousness. It's made of consciousness and it disappears in consciousness and it's seen by consciousness. There's nothing other than consciousness. You don't experience anything in the outside world. You just experience consciousness as consciousness. So that's all there actually is. And the actual consciousness observes everything including your body and your mind. So

45:24it's not your body. It's not your mind. It's its own thing and everything is made of it. So that's all that exists and that's all you are. So they would reverse the answer and say why zombie? You know you're asking why consciousness? No. The answer is why zombie? There's no zombie. The zombie doesn't exist. There is no separate self. There's nothing else out there. And so this is a completely different frame on it. So in that sense, there is no enlightenment. There's no separate being to be enlightened. There's just life. There's just stuff happening. You know, there's just stuff happening. There are thoughts appearing. There are thoughts disappearing. They connect to each other. They talk to each other.

45:55They're valid. They exist. There are bodies. There are minds walking around. And there is an awareness of those things. And you're basically a localized awareness. What you think you are is localized awareness. And this goes back to the oldest question that I think you know Robin and Marshy used to talk about is just who am I? The one thing that I think the the way the enlightened people again bad word get there is they have a persistent experience of no self and that becomes their new default. It is binary. It's not a it's not a pathway to it. And one of the ways that some of them get there some of them are just naturals almost born that way. Some of them they have a mystical experience.

46:32Some of them they have a psychotic break. That's literally what a Krishna already had, right? Um he had this thing called the process which like kept coming back to him and it was just seems like a psychotic break plus his brother died and he went through a bad time. Um some people get there through meditation, you know, decades of meditation. Some people get there through just kind of devoting their life service to others like their self disappears. They see through it. But the the the one that I found the most interesting was they just do what's called self-examination. And self-examination is just looking for the self. Looking for this separate self.

47:06You're convinced you're Eric. I'm convinced I'm the wall. What do we mean by that? What is that? It was very fuzzy definition. What is that exactly? Find me this Eric that's constantly talking about himself, referring to himself. Find me this Eric who suffers. Find me this Eric who feels pride. Find me this Eric who thrives. Find me this Eric who feels good. Find me this Eric who feels bad. Where is this guy hiding? Who is this? Like look for that. And what you find is if you look look look look, you can never pin it down. It's always like it's always on the edge of your vision. It's what Alan once described as like you take a a burning stick and you whirl it around and it looks like you have a flaming wheel. You don't have a flaming wheel. What you have is you have a lot

47:45of thoughts going around that convince you that there's this character in there called Eric. But there's no actual Eric. The self is just a thought. These are just thoughts that are happening that are convincing you there's someone there. So even when I'm speaking to you, there's words coming out and there's thoughts coming out. That's not me. They're just flying out. I'm not controlling them. There's no separate me sitting there controlling them. And then for a moment, I felt sort of proud of how I said this and articulated to you. What is that feeling of pride? It's just a feeling. Who is that feeling referring to? It's not referring to anyone.

48:18There's no one that's referring to. It's just another thought. That pride was just another thought without a target. Well, if I keep looking for that target long enough, then maybe I'll finally realize actually the target doesn't exist. And then when that realize that target doesn't exist or that target has never existed. And if that target has never existed, then eventually those thoughts that were going towards a fake target will start dying down because they're false. They're useless. That knowledge will no longer be replicated in my mind in a Deutschian sense. And then I will be at peace because I will no longer have these egotistical emotions and ups and downs. And I'll realize there was never anybody here.

48:52And it was all just consciousness all along. And some people call that God. >> It's going to take me a while to gra all that. But that's the point. >> Yeah. I mean, maybe I mean some people are very lucky. It happens for them right away. And most people never want it, so it's fine. >> Yeah. Do you um they're truly enlightened people. >> If you ask them like, you know, like I I've gone through this with all of them in different ways, but you know, I've tested them. I'm I'm kind of a a smartass about this, but I've tested them to see if they feel emotional pain in any way, right? >> And my favorite way to test them like, well, >> you know, the best tests are subtle where they don't, you know, it's not obvious, but the one I like to ask them is, well, what if you weren't

49:37enlightened? What if you lost your enlightenment? Or what if like you had never been enlightened? They're completely okay with that, right? Because the truth doesn't change if you know it or not. And if you are not around to know the truth, if you don't exist in any separate sense, it doesn't matter if you know it or not. >> Yeah. And if it breaks under that question, then it was >> it was false. >> It was part of your identity >> into the enlightenment. >> That's right. >> Yeah. Interesting. >> But going back to your question about like can they uh still go about their lives and you know have girlfriends and and businesses and jobs. Yeah.

50:11Absolutely they can. They they do actually. Some of the people that I mentioned, they have jobs, >> one of them is running a company, you know, um, one of them is like really good at dating, dates a lot, right? They they just absolutely have full clarity of mind. They have fully functional bodies. They even have desires. Uh, and they even have wants and needs, but they're not egoic. That they're not wrapped up in a small sense of self that gets easily threatened and gets angry or gets like depressed or any of that. They'll take the actions that you and I would take, but they'll take them much more calmly and they won't take anything personally.

50:52So, they're still getting feedback from the environment. They're still reacting. And if anything, I would argue they're more capable than they ever were and their desires are more genuine. They're less mimedic. They're less status oriented. Now, are they less motivated than say someone like me? Yeah, I haven't met enlightened person who's as motivated as me. On the other hand, I haven't met many people who are as motivated as me, right? Maybe I' I think I may have met like five people in my life who are more motivated. Right? So, it's it's hard to intersect that set. >> And would I take that trade, you know, being slightly less motivated for being a light? Sure. I was going to ask if you um having been so close if you're seeking that or if you feel like >> you know it's impossible not to seek it

51:33even though I know that's a trap. It's like the shiniest of the shiny objects. Like, you know, why would you want to start the next great company when you could be the Buddha, >> you know, when you could be God himself? Like, who are the greatest people in human history that everyone knows? It's Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha, you know, it's that bunch. It's not it's not even the Caesars of the world. Uh maybe the Einsteins, right? But essentially truth seekers. Truth seekers are the most revered and artists. History remembers artists and truth seekers. And the truth seeeking artists are the highest of them all, right? The daqing and so on. That said, it's another chase. It's another chase for something permanent. It's another chase for uh a shiny object.

52:09It's a chase for things being different than they are. And the key thing about enlightened people is that they are fine with everything the way it is. And which includes not being fine with the way things are. They self-actualize. >> They may self-actualize in more authentic ways that are different than how they would have self-actualized pre-enlightenment, but they still self-actualize. I'm really interested in the the ways in which you've broken these like false dichotoies, right? And you mentioned one just there, which is, you know, the enlightened and unmotivated are potentially more effective. You know, you've gotten more effective as you've become happier, even though everyone has this fear of like, oh, if I become happy or if I accept what is, I'll be less productive.

52:54>> Yeah. What What would you rather battle? A terminator that is enlightened or a terminator that is wrapped in an ego. Terminator wrapped in ego is much easier to manipulate. Might have guilt, might have self-doubt, might have anger, will be less efficient. A term that is enlightened is a true terminator. You need to get away from that right away. >> It's interesting. >> There is a place for emotions. Modern society is very safe. So a lot of the anger that we feel is derived from times when anger was there for physical violence or physical reasons. But we now take it on as mental. A lot of the modern suffering comes from we feel things chronically that were meant to be felt acutely for brief periods of time.

53:36So I I just I don't think you are less effective because you're happier. You will choose to do different things. So it may look like, oh, you're changing for the worse because you may look less motivated or motivated for a different thing, but you're motivated for something that is going to make you more effective while you're being happy. By the way, no one chooses to go back to being less happy. Right. Yeah. No, it's just like money. No one chooses to go back to being poor. >> Strictly dominant strategy. Correct. >> To become happy. >> That's right. These are strictly dominance and dominant strategies. These are unalloyed goods. So when people say, "I don't value happiness," that's just not true. That's not true through your own actions because every time you've been happy, you don't want to give that

54:14up. And every time you do something that makes you a little bit happier, you're not going to give that up. Uh, you know, like one one of the things like as you kind of go through the progression of life, there's a point where you have roommates and then you get to like not having roommates, right? You don't want to go back to like the pre- roommate life, >> but then you have kids and you the worst roommates >> and the best. It kind of sucks when the kids grow up and leave too, right? >> Um, you don't want to go back to uh commutes, you know, if you've had long commutes and then you get like start walking to work or having a short commute, it kind of sucks to go back to

54:44commutes. Um, retirement, you know, or or working for yourself. These are these are oneway doors. It's very hard to come back through those doors. >> I I asked about the enlightened people in their relationships because um a lot of people ask me what's something I disagree with you on I think as a test to see if I'm just a complete involved sophant. Um and actually one of the things that I I wrestle with the most is this like you know only the individual ascends. all of your experiences are individual and like objectively I understand the correctness of the you know your perception as individual but I also know that so much of happiness like in my lived experience in research comes from our relationships with the people around us I have to imagine there's a lot of nuance there you can't control them but you are a participant in these

55:29relationships and they do affect your day-to-day happiness >> yeah we we we will disagree because I think that uh it's very difficult to be happy if you're bound wound up in needy relationships and just needing the relationship is needy. Now, obviously, I have my family and I love them very much and they're very important to me, but I'm not going to stay in any relationship that makes me unhappy. I will do my duty. I'll fulfill my obligations. I'll take care of them even if they don't like me. But I'm not going to create stay sustain in a false relationship. And this is truth. Every relationship you're in, you're in because that person provides some value for you or because in in your identity you're tied up and you have some obligation towards them and that's fine. But like if if

56:19literally your wife changed tomorrow, if she was inhabited by a demon who just did everything horrible to you, you would leave, right? So every relationship other than pure blood relationships which are different. They're on a genetic level. You know, you see your kids and you just go nuts in a good way. Every relationship is transactional. It does have a value exchange component. It does have an expectation of give and take. And it's kind of, you know, it sound good but not true, but false. And this this is this is where truth is hard. If truth was easy, everyone would do it, right? But this is where like these false relationships and these false

56:52obligations are tough. So like I don't go to my friends birthdays unless I think the party is going to be fun. How do I go to weddings for example because I think you know largely there's just like enormous amounts of time taken out of your day you know of your week destination weddings oh my god right I don't go to like obligatory things like oh so and so is having an anniversary so and so is having a this thing you have to go you know or the these people need you there for this f no that's like that's like where I draw the hard line no obligations and relationships drive you into obligations and then the obligations drive you into pain now.

57:27Now, now you're not having the pleasant part of the relationships. Now I'm left with in my life people who are similarly free, similarly low ego. We hang out all the time, but it's voluntarily. We all want to see each other and we're all being at our best to each other because we want to attract the other person. We don't take each other for granted, which is like the worst thing that can happen in a relationship. You have to invest into all your relationships because you want to keep them alive. If you value them, you invest in them. But there's no false attachment. you know, it's the neediness that destroys a relationship or creates a fake relationship. Um, obviously to have family, you have obligations and you fulfill them. Uh,

58:05and I actually have I don't have a single estrange family member. Everyone everyone is in my life. Everyone in family. So, you know, it's not one of those your family is broken. We have to fix the world situations. The family is functioning really well. But at the same time, you have to be happy on your own. You know, the secret to a happy relationship is two happy people. Okay? Uh because you can't be happy with your spouse. They'll drag you down or you'll drag them down. Uh so it's important that each person find happiness. And happiness is personal. They each have to work on it. The the worst thing you can do in relationships is go to somebody else and say, "Cheer up being happy."

58:41>> You know, what's wrong with you? Why are you depressed? It doesn't work right. So it has to be tackled at an individual level. And then once your own house is in order, then you can form genuine relationships with other people. But putting relationships ahead of your own work and your own happiness, I think is a mistake. You will get neither. >> I think that's a good formulation of like they are valuable and important. You want to pursue them in that order. And if I if I'm describing it correctly, your approach, you want them to be maximally truthful. Like you don't want to go into a relationship trying to make someone else happy. And I don't want them to do things to make me happy that

59:18are dishonest. I don't want them to, you know, feel like I'm a burden or an obligation. You know, like one of the issues I have is like uh as a parent like I do things, you know, for my kids because I love them >> and people around me are always trying to train them to say thank you. They'll say, "Oh, you know, your dad gave you something. Did you say thank you?" I'm like, "Don't don't do that. Don't train them. They're not an animal." Like, if they genuinely feel gratitude, they'll come out in some way. I don't need it. I'm not doing it for the gratitude. Yeah. >> Right. And I don't want to train them like an animal. If they're genuinely thankful, it'll come out, you know? And if they're not, it won't. But don't don't don't force it. I don't I don't want any forced obligations relationship

59:59in either direction. >> Yeah. >> The only relationships I I believe in are peer relationships. Like obviously people work for you, but even then you always want to treat them as much like a peer as you can given the circumstances. Uh because otherwise it ends up formalized. It ends up ritualistic. It ends up false. It ends up unhappy. Um, you know, where where do you find it's funny in if you go to an event like a wedding or you go to like a big party, a lot of times you'll find a lot of show about happiness, you know, people cheering. Yeah. You know, but like they're not the genuine article is rarely there, you know. The genuine happiness comes in smaller interactions that are more genuine and less forced.

1:00:42Like if you're forced to wear a tux and you're forced to show up a certain time, then you're forced to listen to a speech, then you're forced to do a toast, then you're forced to go around and it's just like that's not what actually makes you happy. If it was genuinely how it makes you what makes you happy, then you would be doing that every day. You'd be going to every party and every wedding and every bar mitzvah and everything you get invited to. But at some level, those things are tedious. You're doing them for other people and they're doing them for you. Like who's doing it for themselves, right? So I I think like true celebration uh is a beautiful thing but it has been ritualized so much >> like Valentine's Day, having to send

1:01:17flowers, you know, Hallmark cards, all this stuff is ritualistic Uh real happiness is when you're genuinely grateful with somebody else and you know you do something kind for them because you just want to and you have to create space for that in your life and you have to create situations where you feel it authentically for people to genuinely you know inspire that in you and I don't want anything ritualistic. I never want a card. I never want a you know a ritualistic gift. I don't want a medal. I don't want an award. you know, all these things are useless. >> I was gonna ask you about, you know, helping people sort of find the the courage to be that truthful in their lives. But, you know, I think it just goes back to the long-term view like you know that the truth, even if it causes

1:02:07short-term pain of like, hey, I'm not I'm not going to do this to make you happy. I don't want you to do this just to make me happy is the best way to create this long term. >> That's absolutely true. But I think it's even deeper than that. It's that truth is non-negotiable. like find me a single person who says I don't want the truth. That's a rare person, right? >> Well, the express preference I think there's probably plenty of people living uh choosing to live lies. >> I think they don't want to disappoint other people >> and I think so we're all caught in this collective trap, >> right? Like one of the things co did that was good was it broke the collective trap of commuting,

1:02:42>> right? It legitimized work from home. Now some people might take it too far and they just checked out completely. But overall it it broke society of its addiction of commuting to un unnecessary commuting to unnecessary meetings and that was good. So I think the same way like it would be good if we can break society of it addiction to pump and circumstance, >> right? like Valentine's Day, like that should be happening all the time with the person you love spontaneously and naturally instead of February 14th, everybody tries to get in the same overpriced restaurant and buys the same overpriced flowers and gives the same

1:03:16overpriced checks the same box, right? And if you don't feel like doing it naturally, then that means there's something wrong with your relationship that you should fix or you should move on to another relationship. But what's not the correct answer is to do this falsehood of checking the box every year and kicking the can down the road. Just wasting everybody's time.

00:00你好,欢迎。距离《Naval 宝典》首次出版已经五年了。为了纪念这件事,Naval 和我想为你做一期特别版。我们共处了一整天,录了四个多小时的对话。现在,我们把这段对话分享给你,更新并扩展了书里的核心观点。就像《Naval 宝典》里其他一切内容一样,这一版也是免费提供的,此外还有你常用平台上的有声书。这本书是靠口碑成长起来的,被人赠送、被人推荐,最终触达了全世界数以百万计的读者,被译成四十种语言。我希望你也能帮这些好想法继续传播。那么,谢谢你

00:43加入我们。我们开始吧。幸福。我很喜欢这样一个框架:幸福是一种高度个人化的技能,可以像健身、营养,或者像我们谈过的财富那样被学会。嗯,而这似乎确实是一条很常见的线索贯穿你的想法,就是基础原则与个人实践的结合。>> 是啊。我的意思是,你看,幸福就是那种对不同人有不同含义的词。有人会说,我不想幸福。另一些人会说,你什么意思,我天生就不快乐吗?每个人都有一个借口、一个理由或一种解释。

01:18这是个太私人的话题,我很难谈。我的意思是,我最近的想法是:幸福这种东西根本不存在。对吧?所以关于它我能给你二十句互相矛盾的话。每一句,你要么当成陈词滥调或胡说八道扔掉,要么它会让你想一想。希望它会让你想一想。嗯,但我最近的想法是,我并不真的在乎幸福,我甚至不确定它真的存在。你知道,幸福是心智的建构。它是一个概念>> 它是一种,你会有念头说「哦,我现在很幸福」。然后当那些念头消失了,发生了什么?你是不幸还是幸福?那里什么都没有。对吧?这就是佛教里那个古老的「无我」

01:58对吧?当你有一个念头,那个念头进来了。那个念头宣称自己就是「我」。那个念头从某个地方冒出来,从我们称之为「自我」的一个东西里冒出来,而那个东西定义得极其模糊。当你去找它仔细看的时候,你很难辨认出那到底是个什么东西。所以在这个意义上,幸福就像自我一样,它本身也只是一个念头。所以幸福只是一个念头,不幸也只是一个念头。于是你可以有幸福的念头,也可以有不幸的念头。有些行为和心态会带来更多幸福的念头,也有些行为和心态会带来更多不幸的念头。

02:33但如果你认同那个念头,如果你觉得「我就是那个念头,是我在产生那个念头」,那么在那一刻,你就造出了一个「我」,在你产生那个念头时它是幸福的。然后当那个念头消失时,那里就不再有一个「我」了。没有念头,也没有幸福;然后当不幸的念头出现,你认同它,你就造出了一个念头:我不幸,我在产生不幸的念头,那就是我,我不幸;然后当那个念头消失,那里没有人,没有念头,也没有不幸;整个构造都是通过在你心里来来去去的念头造出来的。我甚至犹豫该不该说「心里」,因为当你不去产生关于心的念头时,这个心在哪儿呢

03:09当你没有关于心的念头时,对吧?就像我们在这个话题上谈的一切都存在于念头的层面,但如果你不强烈地陷入那些念头、不认同那些念头,你就不会有幸福或不幸的概念。而外面的世界里当然也没有幸福。>> 这两个意思很不一样。一个意思是,外面的世界里没有幸福,因为这是你在内部拥有的一种心智建构。所以你可以重新解释你的过去,重新解释你的处境,从而常常改变这些东西,或者改变你的习惯。但第二个意思是,外部世界里没有幸福,外部世界极其无常,不受你控制,外部世界永远有让你不幸福的理由。同样,外部世界里也没有

03:55不幸。那是你在心里编出来的,因为它没有按你想要的方式发展。>> 是啊。>> 而且,世界本身并不在乎。外部世界能让你多不幸,取决于你允许它到什么程度。当然,这有明显例外。比如你身体疼痛时,你的身体是不幸的。那会让你的心不幸,会让你强烈地认同那份疼痛,你就会不幸。对吧?这其实正是为什么你可以说整个心智构造存在,就是为了感受那个东西,为了对疼痛做出反应。你知道,关于疼痛的一个定义是:疼痛要求回应。>> 对,疼痛是个东西,它在说:现在就注意我,放下你

04:35正在做的事,别做白日梦,现在就注意我。情绪上的痛苦是它的一种变体。>> 嗯,但幸福和不幸,这些都是非常私人的概念。嗯,我会说我对这事的新想法,我最新的想法随时会变。我不是开悟的人,我不是一个永远幸福的人。所以这真的只是一个人的个人探索。我最近的想法是,我并不一定想要幸福。我某种程度想要的,是那种禅宗的对事物本来的样子感到安然。我觉得当我的欲望很少、并且是有意识选择的时候,更容易进入那种状态。嗯,当我做事出于非自私的理由——而那在某种意义上又是自私的。比如如果我做的事

05:24比我自身更大,那么无论最终结果如何,我都会更安然。比如,如果我真心想让世界变得更好——我不是说我做到了,但假设我是特蕾莎修女或类似的人真心想让世界变得更好。如果世界不让我把它变得更好,我不会觉得这是针对我个人的,对吧?因为这不是一个个人使命。同样,当一个人为了上帝或者为了孩子无私地做一件事,当事与愿违时,其实伤得没那么深。

05:55所以更高的动机在这方面是有帮助的。你知道,抑郁的人在反复咀嚼自己,他们真的在想自己。所以不去想自己是有帮助的。嗯,我关于这点的一条简短推文是:你越是想着自己,你就越不幸福。就这么简单。嗯,所以我更感兴趣的是平静。现在,我想一直平静吗?我不知道。那似乎有点无聊。有一种论点认为,无聊——这是叔本华式的论点——无聊揭示了存在的空虚。因为当你什么都不做,当你获得短暂的满足、所有欲望都被实现,你只是坐在那里。会发生什么?无聊立刻出现。

06:38为什么?因为存在本身在某种程度上是空的。于是你又会想去干点别的。这是悲观的视角。乐观的视角是:那其实是心智。你的心智对快乐上瘾,所以它想跳起来去做点快乐的事,因为它习惯了。有帮助的做法是意识到:所有问题都是心智造出来的,而且是有正当理由的。我不是说心智是个坏东西。它在那里是为了保护你的身体,但我们有一种方式,会去承接那些并不影响我们的问题。政治就是一个好例子。你知道,地球另一端的战争,或者政党之类的。你的心就这样捡起一些根本不重要的问题和欲望。

07:22所以,是的,如果你是佛陀,你可以住在「无念」里。但如果你是个普通人,至少一个理性的人,可以通过对超出自己直接控制范围之外的事物养成一种策略性的漠然,从而获得一定程度的平静。对吧?我过去把这点说得更好,但现在我加了点保留,因为我是现场重新组织而不是引用,因为我觉得你就是得抓住自己,对吧?冥想的目的不是让你开悟。它做不到那个。它甚至不一定是为了让你立刻更幸福、解决某个问题,或者让你平静下来。冥想的目的只是变得

08:00能自我观察。当你能够自我观察、更有自我觉察时,你会抓住自己的心智在做一些不符合你长期最佳利益的事。然后你可以重置它,或者停下来问:「这是真的吗?这是我真正想经历的吗?」这是一个真正重要的欲望吗?这是我必须为之受苦的事吗?哪个更容易:重新解释这件事,还是真的去处理底层问题?因为我们总是在不断捡起事情来做。所以总之,你知道,如果我只是想当个所谓的「幸福」的人,对吧?再说一次,我不确定有这种东西。就像如果我想平静,那我就什么都不做,但我会无聊。那这是个问题吗?是的,我觉得这是个问题。我不想

08:40无聊。现在,我能超越心智的层面,像个禅僧一样吗?也许吧。但我也挺喜欢生活的,你知道?我喜欢拥有某些天赋。我喜欢自我实现。我喜欢做事。嗯,假设佛教徒是对的,而我就是梵。那我为什么不干脆就待在梵里?我为什么来到这里?对吧?这是个古老的问题。我为什么在这里?对吧?我觉得对「我为什么在这里」唯一实际的答案,就是去做我在做的事。所以如果我就去做我在做的事,不过度思考,那么它自然会把我带到一个幸福的地方。这就回到那首「划呀划呀划小船」,对吧?轻轻地顺流而下。只要我一直在划,而且是轻轻地划,我就在玩那个

09:22我注定要玩的游戏。>> 是啊。我觉得这本书真正让人产生共鸣的一点,是把关于财富和幸福的原则结合在了一起。很多人只谈其中一个,却从不谈两者之间的张力与反差。我觉得很多人某种程度上把你当作一个参照,不管你自己觉不觉得自己是个好例子,我也会很想听你说,一个既投入又平静的人。>> 是啊,我不确定自己完全平静。但肯定比以前平静多了。我没有禅僧那么平静。但我大概比一般焦虑的创始人平静得多。其中一部分

10:00原因是,有钱是有帮助的。我不会在这上面撒谎,对吧?嗯,但我觉得我变得平静是在赚到大钱之前。嗯,那是因为我当时正处在一个压力非常高的时期,我不得不想办法应对它。>> 嗯,我读了一些书,你知道,Christian Morty 和 Osho,还有,嗯,对,我也用过一些迷幻药,就像湾区其他人一样。但不像有些人那样——我觉得有些人他们去火人节,用迷幻药,为迷幻药而活。不,它是一个信息。你收到信息,就挂断电话。嗯,然后我做了大量冥想,嗯,我做了很多

10:35阅读。我想了很多。我做了很多内省。我说不出任何单一的灵丹妙药。但所有这些都有帮助。它帮我在做事的时候保持平静,你知道,不至于痛苦。嗯,再说一次,我有点想要一切事情的懒人解法。所以我想要开悟的懒人解法。我想要财富的懒人解法。我想要艺术与创造力的懒人心法解法。所谓懒,我指的是做那些对我来说不像是工作的事,对吧?所以思考对我来说不像工作。思考那些大问题,不去想它们反而比去想它们更像工作。

11:13对吧?如果我在深夜来回踱步,午夜时分,独自一人,我会自然地开始琢磨:这一切到底是怎么回事?你知道,你怎么可能对自己的存在不感到好奇呢?对吧?我觉得我们都只是放弃了。我们就像:「哦,对。好吧。曾经有一段时间我对自己的存在感到好奇。我在某个年纪就过了那个阶段。嗯,现在我就是一只猴子,会做一堆事,然后死掉。」>> 我想这也挺有意思。取决于你在与这些问题搏斗时是否享受,还是觉得它们是折磨。>> 我觉得它们是不可避免的。我觉得每个人都在与它们搏斗。只是公开承认这件事并不流行。

11:48>> 嗯,我觉得我对 Twitter 的贡献不是我做了多么独特的事,而是我是最早做这件事的人之一。嗯,你知道,现在有很多账号,坦白说在说同样的事,或者用非常有趣的方式说不同的事。我只是做得早。而且我觉得,人们在生活里会划边界,对吧?史蒂夫·乔布斯在我看来是创业者的极致,原因之一是他不只是一个商人,他也是一个艺术家。你知道,他用过 LSD 并公开谈过,他也冥想。他差点成了僧侣。嗯,他是禅宗佛教徒。嗯,所以他也

12:26试图解决生活里的一切,所有大问题。你知道,我想透了这件事,最终回到的是——我最近发过一条相关的推文,其实我忘了那条推文的确切措辞,但我知道那些原则,这才是重要的。原则是:首先你得保持健康。你出生时是健康的,但你不会健康地走到最后,所以你能把这件事拖得越久越好,对吧?这就是为什么我们会被 Brian Johnson 这样的人激励,或者你心目中的健身大师、健康大师。你得保持健康,这是底线。然后你想变得富有。如果你说不想变富,那你是在撒谎。

12:57每个人都想要至少某种程度的财富,对吧?也许不是。嗯,好吧。对,如果你在道德表演社会主义,也许你不想要。或者如果你不想比同龄人高出太多,你就不想要。但你想要某种程度的舒适和财富。对,不必为钱发愁。>> 没人想要更少的财富。没人想倒退。>> 没错。而且你知道那句老话吗?嗯,钱不能解决你所有的问题,但它能解决你所有关于钱的问题。所以你想把所有关于钱的问题解决掉,然后剩下的是什么?

13:27每次我在这上面绕圈子,最后都会回到我感兴趣的三件事。听起来会很老套,但我会深入讲。那就是真、爱和美。真就是:我想知道所有真实的东西,我想消除所有虚假的东西。而且我想知道所有真实的东西,在灵性层面、哲学层面、科学层面、技术层面、人性层面。真是永恒的。真,你知道,是最接近完美的东西。真有广阔的适用范围。真会让我的生活更好。即使它让我的生活更糟,我还是想知道真相。它在这方面非常独特。

14:05真与爱是两样东西,即使它让你的生活更糟,你仍然会选择它们。比如爱你的孩子,即使这让你的生活更糟,但让他们过得更好,你愿意爱你的孩子,因为身处爱中感觉很好,感觉充实。真也是如此,即使真让你的生活更糟,比如如果发现我们确实都是泡在缸里的 Matrix 大脑,你知道,你还是会想知道。事实上在《Matrix》这部电影里,Keanu Reeves 演的角色 Neo 冲出了 Matrix,而 Zion 比 Matrix 更糟,那是个糟糕的生存环境,那座真实的城市。还有

14:38另一个人,嗯,我忘了名字 >> Cipher >> 是吗 >> Cipher >> Cipher,对,Cipher。Cipher 想回到 Matrix 里,因为他宁愿吃假牛排、喝假酒。但 Cipher 是个可悲的角色。Cipher 是一个警告。没人会说「哦对,我就是 Cipher」。对吧?每个人都想当 Neo,因为他们知道你不能活在谎言里。所以真超级重要,在我做的一切事里,每一件小事、大事里,我都想知道真相。>> 你确实说过,你离真相越近,就越接近平静。>> 是啊。我记得我的说法是:你离真相越近,内在就越安静。>> 所以这是刻意选择的,嗯,因为当你知道什么是真的,你受的苦就更少,你花更少时间

15:19反复咀嚼虚假的东西,而你脑中经过的大多数念头都与虚假有关。佛教徒会说,最终的虚假就是「自我」这个概念——那个定义极其模糊、部分是身体、部分是心智的构造,它不知怎地跨念头持续存在。你把越多事情分辨为真或假,你的心里嘈杂就应该越少。直到那个程度:那些极有智慧的、开悟的人是完全内在寂静的,因为他们看穿了自我的幻觉,他们没有独立的自我,没有独立的、持续存在的自我体验。所以如果你的心嘈杂变少了,那是个迹象,说明你正走在正确的

16:01方向上。话虽如此,以我的经验,你的心其实并不会真的安静很多,但希望焦虑会少一些。这在冥想中会发生。如果你在冥想,你会发现——至少我发现,前二十分钟你的心会到处乱窜、发疯。然后某个时点它安静下来,大概三四五十分钟的时候,它就是一片空白,那其实是一种非常喜乐的状态。嗯,或者会因你冥想的方式而不同,但它肯定不会像之前那么嘈杂。其中很大一部分是因为你在解决问题。而你的很多问题并不需要现实世界的解决,它们只需要被承认。一个经典练习是:当你有一种情绪,

16:43当你有一种强烈的感受,你就去注意它,把它解构,然后说:「好,身体里有一点点相关的感受。那个身体感觉真的令人不适吗?」其实不是。比如它只是胸口的一种空落感,感觉也没那么糟。然后有一个与之相关的念头。那个念头令人不适吗?念头本身感受不到痛苦,只是那样。那么,是谁在把它归类为不适?是你。那么,在这种情况下,「你」是什么?它只是另一个念头。所以,就是你的一个念头在说:我不想要这里这个别的念头,再关联上一种身体感觉。

17:16但真的,当你解构它,你会意识到,除非有真正的紧急情况,那里其实没多少东西。嗯,当你擅长做这件事,或者你开始看穿那个把戏,它会帮你度过不愉快的处境。几年前我遇到过一个非常不愉快的处境,嗯,我当时极度不快乐。嗯,但我不会忘记这一点:我身体里还有一部分,只是在旁观那个非常不快乐的部分,只是想着:哈哈,你知道,这是你在演的一出小戏,为了感觉自己重要,但这里其实什么都没有。就像,没有任何东西在被攻击,没有任何东西在受伤。

17:54你没有身体上的疼痛,你知道吧?这只是一个你在思考的处境,而你在变出这份深深的不快乐,你在制造一场戏。你在搭一个舞台、演一场戏,为了感觉自己重要。我觉得很多时候我们不快乐,我们只是痴迷于「感觉自己重要」这个念头。这又回到对永恒的渴望。我们想感觉自己重要。我们想感觉自己永恒。我们不想感受到自己终将死去。有真,还有爱与美,对吧?所以那是另外两样东西。>> 哦对。对对对。而关于爱,我会说,一旦你的健康被照顾好,一旦你的

18:26物质需求被照顾好,你就去追求真、爱和美。我们谈过真。我觉得爱重要,因为人们想被爱,因为那帮他们跨过自己的必死性。那让他们感觉稍微安全一些。你知道,猴子们在黑暗中围着篝火挤在一起,害怕树林里有什么东西。但对我自己,我意识到一件事:去爱比被爱更好。如果有人太爱你,比如你妈总是过来抱你,或者某个女孩、某个男生对你着迷,那会变得有点黏人抓人,对吧?那感觉像是一种负担。你

18:57几乎不想要那个。但当你对某人有爱的感觉时,那才是你亢奋的时候。那是你欣喜若狂的时候。所以这有点反直觉,但爱上某个人或某件事,其实对你非常有益。它确实包含牺牲,包含风险。但我觉得那些在生活中放弃爱的人,你知道,那算是挺可悲的人生,对吧?你太快就变得愤世嫉俗。你不一定非得爱人类。你可以爱宇宙、上帝、动物,随便什么。但每个人都需要在生活中找到某个自己爱它胜过爱自己的东西,他们的使命、他们的家庭、他们的孩子,嗯,他们的宗教。否则,那会是一个悲惨的人生。最后,你知道,我们是主动的生物。这就是我和所有佛陀、所有

19:44禅僧等等真正分歧的地方。是,砍柴挑水,但那不是人类的繁荣,对吧?这就是 Deutsch 特别有用的地方。我们是通用解释者。我们注定要解决问题。我们注定要逆转熵。我们注定要推进宇宙中的文明与知识。所以我们可以创造。创造力是我们最高的艺术形式。所以我们应该创造。面对死亡,你可以被动地说:好吧,这些都不重要。也可以主动地说:什么都不重要,那我就去创造最好的东西。我要按你自己的定义活出最好的人生。所以我想创造东西。

20:15那你想创造什么?你怎么知道某样东西值得创造?嗯,它美。它难以被改动。它内部嵌着深刻的解释和知识。嗯,人们想使用美的东西。所以你想创造那种传达情感、让人想用的美的东西。而对我来说,这就是为什么像 iPhone 这样的东西是人类创造过的最伟大的艺术品之一,因为它是一件美的物件。它像一件珠宝,但它同时也极其有用。它承载了大量知识。它非常难以被改动。而它确实让世界变得更好了。>> 是啊。那条推文的原话是:「保持健康,获得财富,追求真相,给予爱,创造美。」

20:55>> 就是这样。那就是我想做的事。我想纹在眼皮上的那句话是:任何时候你过得不开心、你不是真的幸福,你都没有在帮任何人的忙。并不是说你的不快乐让其他人过得更好。而我不知道为什么,不知道这是从哪里学来的,或者只是我自己想把自己当回事,但培养不快乐这件事,似乎会给一个情境带来某种严肃感。尤其是作为一个领导者,或者你想认真对待某件事,你某种程度会带出一个不快乐的自己。嗯,我发现——而且我知道我知道这是个错误,我之后该发条推文记下来。>> 嗯,插播推文时间

21:38>> 对,插播推文:急性不快乐是真实的,或者说是有用的,但慢性不快乐是一场自我的表演。>> 对,因为慢性不快乐就是你只是想更多地感觉到「你」。你想感觉自己是分离的。你想感觉自己重要。你知道,你在其中裹着一层身份认同。你的身份越薄,你越能看清现实,因为身份常常就站在你和「如实看见现实」之间。它是终极的、有动机的推理。>> 当某件事与你的身份相冲突时,你会去对抗它。你会拼了命去对抗它。你知道,如果你是白人,我说白人很烂,那此刻那就是你的身份,你会去对抗。或者说黑人很烂,随便什么,对吧?所以这就是种族主义的问题所在:人们无法改变自己的身份。于是,

22:27当你种族歧视时,你立刻就把他们变成了敌人。嗯,那就制造了战争。所以你得让自己的身份保持单薄。你不想去选择你的身份,对吧?身份就像是你摆脱不掉的东西。但任何被选择的身份都是一件束身衣。它把你锁在里面。这对幸福成立,但对真相也成立。而这里我会说,那些不快乐的人,曾经有一段时间那种不快乐对他们是有用的。我想我之前提到过他,William Glasser,他算是我最喜欢的那类心理学家兼作家,他写了一系列非常好的书,围绕他称之为「选择理论」的东西。但他最具争议的观察之一是:抑郁其实是一种选择,或者它是

23:10一系列被做出的选择。它是一系列你小时候做出的选择的结果,那些选择后来变成了无意识的习惯,并且自我延续。所以当你小的时候,作为婴儿,你一开始通过哭来获得父母的注意,每次你哭,他们就过来回应。后来你发现,对陌生人哭其实没用,那只会把他们推开。于是你开始微笑,或者你开始沟通。但最终你会遇到一些情况:你想获得某人的注意,无论是父母、老师还是同龄人,而他们不给你注意。于是你在内部哭泣。你发出信号,表示你

23:44是如此不快乐,以至于你愿意伤害自己。而这就是抑郁。它是通过你自己的不快乐来伤害自己,然后你开始反复咀嚼它。它可能在一小段时间内有效。它把一些人拉得更近,而它可以导致这样一种局面:你现在不知不觉或下意识地最终陷入抑郁,而没意识到这是一种习得行为。我不是说那里不可能有化学因素。显然总是有化学因素——饥饿有化学因素,运动能力有化学因素,智力也有遗传因素,但你可以让它更糟。而说这全是化学失衡,什么也没解释。

24:22那就像在问:我们为什么在这里?嗯,是因为大爆炸以来的粒子碰撞,对吧?这太还原论了。所以解释必须与问题处在同一层面。所以当我们说「我为什么不快乐」时,忘掉化学失衡。你打算改变你的大脑,对吧?而吃药只会在别的方面把你搞乱。每个长期服用这类药物的人,最终都会放弃自己身上某些别的基本东西。嗯,而且,很多最好的艺术家在别的方面都很疯,对吧?所以你不希望把自己的心智状态给平均化。所以,抑郁可能是一系列坏选择的结果,那些选择后来变成了坏习惯。而它们确实造出一个自我,因为它们造出一个

25:02分离的「我」的身份。然后你开始如此深地认同那个「我」。就像:不然我还能是谁?好吧,我就是一个不快乐的人。但那也正是让我才华横溢、让我特别、让我有趣、让我未被发现等等的原因。所以你可以围绕它裹上一整套身份。而很难拆掉那个身份,因为那时你会想:那我凭什么独特?但这值得做。顺便说,这就像如果你读 Jed McKenna,对吧,灵性剖析,他在做什么?他在遍历自己的整个身份,把它一层层剥掉。>> 我觉得他把那过程有多痛给过度戏剧化了。但这算是个挺有意思的方法。

25:37>> 那是你经历过的一个过程。>> 不。不。>> 解构你的身份?>> 不。对,也许有一点。但不是有意识的。我的意思是,我只是,嗯,我不觉得任何人提出的任何技巧会对你有用。我不觉得心智的技巧有效,因为心智是无限复杂的,能产生任何念头,能在心灵空间里从一个点一跳到达任何另一个点。对吧?正因如此,没有一条能穿越另一个人心智的路径。所以你可以被别人启发,嗯,但正确的想法可以在一瞬间改变你,而错误的练习,你知道,每天做三十年也不会有任何区别。

26:20>> 我是说,从这个框架看,这是一个非常乐观的视角来看待一个不快乐的人、一个长期不快乐的人:你改变的速度没有上限,那个改变能有多正面也没有上限。>> 没错。变富和变幸福最重要的一点,就是意识到你能做到。这是你的选择。你可以两者都做,也可以两者都是,尝试两者兼得没有任何问题。>> 这一整节的开场推文是:人生三件大事是财富、健康和幸福。我们按这个顺序追求它们,但它们的重要程度是反过来的。我一直好奇,这个顺序是不是应该倒过来追求,还是你觉得最优路径是找到平衡、并行追求它们全部。

27:04>> 我对顺序没有强烈看法。我对各个组成部分的看法更强烈,对吧?嗯,你可以用不同顺序追求它们。有些人天生就快乐,天然快乐,什么都破坏不了。他们就是一直快乐,那是最伟大的礼物,>> 对吧?所以我觉得它是最重要的。甚至有些人身体不健康,但仍然快乐。他们确实存在,你知道,他们是有福的。所以如果你能拿到那一个,你基本就稳了。嗯,因为另外两个只是通往那两样东西的尝试性路径,或者那两样东西的前提条件。但如果你不需要另外两个作为前提,如果你属于那种神奇的人,那当然,直接去获得幸福、就去

27:40幸福吧。嗯,就财富和健康而言,对,我觉得健康比财富更重要。去问任何一个年老不健康的人,他们会拿很多钱换回健康。或者那句孔子的老话,我之前引用过,但你知道,嗯,健康的人想要一万样东西,生病的人只想要一样东西。这非常真实。你生病时,你知道,你只想重新站起来。所以健康非常重要,然后财富嗯,你知道,它解决你所有的物质问题,也很重要。说实话,这三样我一样都不会放弃。话虽如此,如果你只能选一样,你知道,幸福会是第一位,但你不应该非得

28:18只选一样,因为你有凳子的三条腿。我觉得大多数人会想要全部三样。而财富最好在年轻时追求,因为那时你精力更旺、更灵活、责任更少。在住哪里、做什么这些方面,你也更有可塑性。你就是更乐观。你也可以以后再去追求,只是更难。你知道那首老歌怎么唱的吗?凡事都有它的季节。你知道,如果你十几岁,你应该学习和动手做。如果你二十多岁,你大概想非常努力地工作,可以说是在竞技场里。三十多岁,你想开始收获。那是你有关系网、同时还有很多

28:50精力的时候。四十多岁,你绝对应该在收获。而这也是你真正要盯住健康的时候,而且你最好到这时已经变得快乐了,因为剩下的时间不多了。然后当你五十多岁,你可以做你的政治回馈,以及你对社会的贡献,做慈善公益;当你六十多岁,你可以当哲学家,因为经历了足够多的事,你想透了足够多的东西。所以这一切都有某种自然的季节规律。我想在罗马时代——我读罗马史不多,但我的感觉是,在古时候,你十几岁会学习。当你

29:24二十多岁,你会去打仗。三十多岁,你做你的生意。四十多岁,你从政。五十多岁,你做你的哲学。对吧?大致是这样,类似这样。也许每个阶段上前后差几年。嗯,所以凡事都有季节。所以你想先获得财富。年轻时健康大概是被视为理所当然的。然后随着年龄增长,你想保住你的健康。然后你最好在某个时点之前搞清楚怎么变得快乐,因为你不想到老了成为那种脾气暴躁的老人,随着年龄增长越来越愤怒、越来越苦、对世界越来越愤世嫉俗。

29:53我们在很老的人身上都见过。我在老人身上只看到两个极端。要么是那种对一切都无所谓的人,你知道,他们已经与世界和解;要么是对一切都很苦毒的人,对吧?嗯,因为随着变老,我们会在自己所在的方向上越来越成为自己。C.S. Lewis 谈过这个,对他来说,道德和自由意志意味着你做的每一个小动作都会累积,而你是三十年、五十年、一百年这些累积动作的产物。你应该为每一个小动作负责,因为它让你更靠近天堂或更靠近地狱。如果你一直做小的坏决定,它们会导致

30:35中等大小的坏决定,再导致大的坏决定,很难回头,最后你的人生就失败了。所以是的,我觉得如果你遵循季节哲学——凡事都有季节——你从财富开始,你保住健康,然后你变得快乐。但重要程度某种意义上是反过来的:那些天生快乐的人拥有最伟大的礼物,他们不需要另外两样。而那些没有健康的人,其实并不太在乎自己的财富。所以这就是我大致支持那个顺序的原因,但我对它的感觉并不特别强烈。>> 是啊。很多人陷入的一种失败模式是:他们花太多时间追求财富,牺牲了幸福,牺牲了健康,然后发现得太晚——他们早就远远超过了

31:16自己的财富门槛。他们赚的钱远超所需,或者他们的身份变得太神圣化、无法改变。而且你知道,>> 是啊,我觉得健康这部分,每个人随着年龄增长都会想明白。没人想变得不那么健康。每个人都想更健康,因为不健康的反馈回路非常紧。疼痛要求回应,最终疼痛会显现出来。所以每个人都想更健康,我觉得人们会想明白这一点,尤其是当他们变富之后,你知道,他们对时间有更多控制,可以投入时间在健康上。而且说实话,现在有 GLP-1 之类的药,人们可以减重,而肥胖大概是

31:54最大的大众市场不健康驱动因素,所以那个问题正在被解决。但幸福这个很难,很多人甚至不相信它可能。我会说,我大多数赚了很多钱的同代人并不是快乐的人,而且不只是不快乐。他们没有一种想象力去按自己的方式建造生活。他们过着非常有结构的生活,照搬他们年轻时所拥有的模式,而且不是以好的方式。我会说他们被束身衣困住,比如,你知道,孩子在读书所以我不能旅行。你知道,我没请帮手,因为,你知道,我们应该自己洗碗。

32:35这些是亿万富翁,却这样行事,对吧?嗯,或者他们就是不会跳出框框思考,对吧?他们去参加义务性的会议、活动、节庆或典礼,而那些只是乏味。你知道,就像和乏味的人开乏味的会,对吧?所以我发现他们中太多人无法像改造自己的事业或生意那样去改造自己的生活。我是指「hack」的好的一面,对吧?不过 >> 自主性,对。>> 自主性,对。他们对自己生活的其余部分是低自主性的。他们对工作则是极高自主性的。然后他们的心态和性情,他们天生就不快乐。他们无法享受自己。他们无法过得开心。他们不

33:13是真心享受自己在做的事。或者他们的家庭生活艰难、关系艰难。所有这些都某种程度是你自己心理状态的下游产物。>> 这也是吸引我去看你几十年来分享的一切的原因之一:一种对生活中一切的高自主性感。>> 我的人生很棒。如果人们知道我的生活有多好,我会被赶出城。我的生活真的很好。我的意思是,基本上一天中的任何时刻,我都在做我想做的事。它是经过深思的。它是斟酌过的。它不是义务性的。它被设计成那样:它确实让我与家人和我关心的人保持非常好的、真实的关系。但我不做任何我不想做的事。我享受我想做的事。如果我不享受

34:00它,我会非常非常快地改变它。而且是的,这不是按任何人的规则生活。就像一切都是为我量身建造的。>> 你说过自己懒,但我觉得那其实可能是对「投入产出比」的关注。>> 是啊。我什么都想要 80/20。我想要——其实我想要那个 95/99 的 >> 分形的 80/20。>> 对,正是。嗯,我想在生活的每个方面都以最少的付出获得最多的回报,然后你知道,再去开拓更多业务。而且其实即使在哲学家当中,我也喜欢叔本华,因为他如此以真为导向,但他看起来并不享受自己的人生,对吧?而像 Osho 那样的人,虽然他有点疯,我也不完全同意他说的一切,但至少他

34:43在享受他的人生 >> 哦,他客观上是享受人生的,就是纪录片里那些狂欢和十七辆劳斯莱斯之类的 >> 你知道,他,那些我一点也不认同,但他肯定是过得挺开心的。嗯,对我来说,听 Osho 或史蒂夫·乔布斯讲话更有意思,>> 嗯,而不是听某个非常成功、甚至开悟了,但看起来只是阴郁、低落或痛苦的人。对。>> 我觉得幸福那部分内容、幸福那些章节、幸福那些观点,其中一个承重支柱是对感知的自主权 >> 或者说感知。对感知的自主权,也就是理解到——我是说

35:25你那条推文:没有任何外力在影响你的情绪,不管感觉如何,你都能控制自己如何解释正在发生的事 >> 对,改变你对过去的解释。你并不储存过去的记忆,你储存的是对过去记忆的解释 >> 所以改变那些解释,或者重新审视那些解释,可能很痛但有用,它需要一定程度的谦逊 >> 你知道,自我是一个挡在路上的东西。自我并不真的存在,它只是一个概念,但,嗯,自我就是:你不想要经历那些痛苦的念头,去重新评估你认为自己是谁、你认为什么让你重要。所以

36:00你不愿意重新审视自己的过去。比如说,不管什么原因,嗯,你知道,你和父母有冲突,对吧?于是现在你有一个身份和对过去的解释:你父母是坏人,你和他们处不来,因此你才处在现在的处境里。那是他们的错。嗯,那大概不是真的。那大概让你远离了你的父母。那大概让你的生活痛苦。那大概也让他们痛苦。然后当你有孩子,你的孩子就没法接触他们的祖父母。而现实是,如果你回头去试着非常客观、中立,给他们善意

36:35的推定,意识到他们在基因上和你非常相似。他们只是有不同的处境,他们做出了不得不做的艰难选择,也许那并不完全是他们的错,也许你可以对此更宽厚一些。如果你重新解释那件事,那么你和他们就能有一个客观意义上更好的人生。但那需要你承受自我的一击:不,其实你错了。也就是说,你人生中出问题的一些事是你自己的糟糕选择。看到这个真相也许能让你做出更好的选择,但它确实意味着你要承受自我的一击。你必须产生痛苦的念头。而这就是冥想、或者理解自我本性这类事

37:12有帮助的地方,因为你会意识到那些念头不是你。会有一堆愉快的念头,会有一堆不愉快的念头,然后又会有一堆愉快的念头。再说一次,这些只是念头。念头其实没有感受。念头不会受伤。念头什么也不做。念头没有任何意义。和它稍微解绑、对它保持客观,是有帮助的。所以那是冥想过程的一部分。顺便说,这在迷幻药里也会发生,人们会重新解释自己的过去,然后出来时更快乐,却不知道原因,但真正的原因是他们在过去的问题上做完了功课,重新解释了它们。我想我也做过一些这样的事。不是那种有意识、刻意的练习,让我

37:45说「好吧,我要梳理我的过去并重新解释它」,而只是当我对此保持开放心态、我想「我只想知道真相」的时候,或者,你知道,甚至像是你在精神上受苦,你只想走出来。你只想熬过去。你受够了,你不想再要了,对吧?你不想再受苦了。那时客观地重新评估那些念头就有帮助 >> 或者甚至只是放下它们,如果它们是,你知道,有用的 >> 有用的信念。嗯,即使,比如你放不下它是正确还是错误的解释这回事,如果为了你的未来而重构它对你是有用的,那也行。

38:20>> 对。宽恕就是这个。宽恕是你重新解释发生了什么,从而原谅他们。你说:好吧,也许那并不完全是他们的错。但另一种情形是:那就是他们的错,但我仍然必须真心原谅他们。这很难,但我要这么做,好让自己能往前走。这样它就不再占据我的心和大脑。不是说我坐在这里吐毒吐血、对整个事情只是感到愤怒。只是感觉很糟,因为愤怒让你痛苦。愤怒,你知道,会让你的皮质醇飙升,让你的肾上腺启动,让你衰老,让你感觉糟。很多恶习和罪——传统意义上的那些——都会让你感觉糟。惩罚直接落在你身上。

39:00你立刻感受到它的重负。所以你走出来,不是为了他们,不是为了原谅他们而原谅,而是为了从自己的心里出来、清空自己的心。>> 对。如果你无法出于无私去原谅,你也许可以出于自私去原谅。我喜欢做的一个思想实验是:如果我们可以测量每个人在一个月或一年里的神经化学水平,哪个人类地球上正在体验最多的主观幸福?那个人是谁,他们在哪里,他们怎么生活,他们相信什么,你知道,他们的习惯是什么?我觉得很可能是

39:35一个信教的、有四口之家的水管工,或者某个做义工的人 >> 嗯,我是说,互联网了不起的一点是,外面真的有真正开悟的人>> 而在过去,他们是接触不到的。你知道,过去你得去遥远的山顶才能见到佛陀。>> 他们看起来像是神话。>> 对。在神话时代,你一生总共会遇到一千个人。你遇到当世活佛的概率有多大?而现在,多亏互联网,YouTube 上、Twitter 上有几十个。还有几个在 Airchat 上。我大概见过接近一打这样的人。我和他们交流过。在他们身边待够长时间后,我以自己的标准验证了他们是开悟的,你知道,我从他们身上学习。所以这些人存在。这一切都是

40:20可及的。你可以去找那些人——他们不是那种传统多巴胺快乐意义上的幸福,但他们任何时候都处于平静。没有什么能打扰他们。比如,你知道,被告知得了癌症,对他们来说,所引发的恐惧和快乐程度,就跟收到一张停车罚单差不多。他们对此还挺幽默的,你知道。所以这些人存在。他们完全可接近。你甚至可以雇他们中的一些人当你的私人教练,或者你可以看他们无穷无尽的 YouTube 视频。我是说,我现在就能给你点出十五个。>> 嗯,你要是能点几个名字就太好了。

40:54>> 哦,我是说有些比较知名的,比如 Rupert Spira 和 Mooji,在 YouTube 上。你知道,他们不算出名。有个叫 Nardinon 的人,我跟他相处了很久。他现在小有名气。嗯,他做 Sidaya yoga。他更接近那种经典的上师类型。还有我的私人朋友,Steven Belchure,他和我一起上过 Airchat。他也在 Twitter 上嗯,James Pierce,>> 你知道,他发过很多推文。嗯,Effortless Stoicism、Kapal Gupta,我以前和他合作过。还有 Ascendor,在 YouTube 上。我最近发推提过他。还有另一个人,在中西部某家餐厅当服务员。我忘了他名字。我发推提过他。还有 Saja。这样的人太多了。我是说,我的 YouTube 里全是他们。我看过足够多他们的视频、听过足够多,我知道这些是真货。这些

41:37不是假货。当你亲身在他们面前时,那种差别是可感知的吗?>> 不,没有什么花哨的光环让你飘在九霄云上。嗯,我是说,很多那都是夸张,但我觉得你会发现的是,他们有持续不断的「无我」体验。>> 他们看穿了这样的事实:自我只是一个念头。它是个被建构出来的身份,那里并没有一个人真的会变快乐或不快乐。所以正因如此,他们现在基本上作为纯粹的觉知或意识而活,所以他们本质上是与环境融为一体的。他们感到一种平静,因为你的觉知是你一生中唯一从未改变的东西。它是你生命中从生到死唯一完美而永恒的东西。

42:22而且他们不再困惑,不再把自己想成一个分离的身心构造。所以没有什么能打扰他们。这大概就是共同点。而我通常识别他们的方式是,我只是在他们身边待足够久,直到我看到某件真正糟糕的事发生在他们身上。你得在他们身边待得够久,等到某件真正糟糕的事发生在他们身上,然后你看他们的反应——连一丝扰动都没有,这样你就知道了。>> 有意思。而「开悟」让它显得 >>「开悟」是个特别花哨的词。我不确定有这种东西。>> 嗯,它让它显得是二元的。是这样吗?但我无法想象你是这么看的。

42:58>> 它是二元的。它是二元的,因为,嗯,这有点反直觉。它不是一条路径。顺便说,Osad Guru 也是其中一个。嗯,我见过一群这样的人。我应该列个名单。我在 Twitter 上有一个公开的求道者名单,它追踪的不一定是开悟的人,上面有几个是,但也有一些正在朝那个方向努力的人。他们在乎这件事。他们是真正的求道者。话虽如此,我不确定有「进步」这回事,因为要么你相信自己是一个分离的自我,要么不是。就这么简单。甚至不是「相信」。相信是个错的词。你知道,信念不够强。

43:31信念不足以成事。所以要么你知道自己是一个分离的自我,要么你知道自己不是。嗯,现实是,每个人都是不可知论者。>> 你知道,真正的无神论者很少,真正的宗教徒也很少。如果你真的信教,你就只会说:「好吧,一切都在上帝手中,所以一切都好。」而如果你真的是无神论者,你就只会说:「好吧,这些都不重要,所以一切都好。」对吧?但我们都是不可知论者。这些人有伴侣、有孩子吗?>> 对,这其实是个很好的问题,对吧?因为你想到

44:05首先,「开悟」这个词很糟糕。它暗示有某种你最终会进入的状态,在那里一切都完美,你永远快乐。完全不是这样。只是你消失了,而剩下的就像——有一个很棒的古老哲学难题,叫「哲学僵尸问题」,我看到有人提到它,不一定是指它,但他一开始就问,意识是什么之类的,对吧,意识是为了什么?正是这个问题。哲学僵尸问题基本上是这么说的:你知道,假设你要过完一生,你要解决问题,你要对环境做出反应,你要把事情想清楚,那你需要

44:43意识来干什么?为什么不能只是一个机器人在做这一切?你为什么需要有这个有意识的觉知?因为机器人也能对刺激做出反应,也能解决问题,也能做所有这些事。意识完全是多余的。所以问题就是:为什么有意识?这是个非常西方的概念。为什么有意识?而所有开悟的人都会告诉你:其实意识是唯一存在的东西。一切都在意识中显现,由意识构成,又在意识中消失,并被意识所看见。除了意识,没有别的东西。你在外部世界里并不体验任何东西。你只是以意识体验意识。所以那才是真正存在的一切。而真正的意识观察着一切,包括你的身体和你的心智。所以

45:24它不是你的身体,也不是你的心智。它是它自己的东西,而一切都由它构成。所以那就是存在的一切,那就是你的全部。所以他们会把答案反过来,说:为什么要有僵尸?你知道,你在问「为什么有意识」?不。答案是「为什么有僵尸」?没有僵尸。僵尸不存在。没有分离的自我。外面没有别的东西。所以这是一个完全不同的框架。那么在这个意义上,没有开悟。没有一个分离的存在者去被开悟。只有生命。只有事情在发生。你知道,只有事情在发生。有念头出现,有念头消失。它们彼此连接,彼此对话。

45:55它们有效,它们存在。有身体,有心智在四处走动。而那些东西有一种觉知。而你基本上就是一个局域化的觉知。你所认为的自己,就是局域化的觉知。这又回到那个最古老的问题——我想 Robin 和 Marshy 以前常谈的就是:我是谁?我觉得那些开悟的人——又用了那个烂词——抵达那里的方式是:他们有一种持续不断的无我体验,而那成为他们新的默认状态。它是二元的。它不是一条通往它的路径。他们中有些人抵达那里,有些人是天生的,几乎生来如此。有些人经历了一次神秘体验。

46:32有些人经历了一次精神病性发作。Krishnamurti 经历的就是那个,对吧?嗯,他有这个叫「过程」的东西,不断回到他身上,那看起来就像一次精神病性发作,加上他的兄弟去世了,他经历了一段糟糕的时期。嗯,有些人通过冥想到达那里,你知道,几十年的冥想。有些人通过把一生奉献给服务他人到达那里,他们的自我消失了,他们看穿了它。但我觉得最有意思的一种是,他们只是做所谓的「自我审视」。而自我审视就是去寻找自我。寻找这个分离的自我。

47:06你确信你是 Eric。我确信我是 Naval。我们这么说是什么意思?那是什么?那是个非常模糊的定义。那到底是什么?把那个不断谈论自己、指涉自己的 Eric 给我找出来。把那个受苦的 Eric 给我找出来。把那个感到自豪的 Eric 找出来。把那个茁壮的 Eric 找出来。把那个感觉好的 Eric 找出来。把那个感觉糟的 Eric 找出来。这家伙躲在哪里?这是谁?就去找那个。而你会发现,如果你看、看、看、看,你永远钉不住它。它总是像在你视野的边缘。这就是 Alan 曾描述过的:你拿一根燃烧的木棍旋转,看起来你有一个火轮。你并没有一个火轮。你拥有的是很多

47:45转来转去的念头,它们让你相信里面有一个叫 Eric 的角色。但并没有真实的 Eric。自我只是一个念头。这些只是正在发生的念头,它们让你相信那里有一个人。所以即使我在对你说话,有词出来、有念头出来,那不是我。它们只是飞出来。我并不在控制它们。没有一个分离的「我」坐在那里控制它们。然后有那么一刻,我对自己说得这么好、表达得这么清楚,感到有点自豪。那份自豪感是什么?它只是一种感觉。那份感觉指向谁?它不指向任何人。

48:18没有一个被指向的人。它只是另一个念头。那份自豪只是另一个没有目标的念头。如果我在那个目标上看得足够久,也许我最终会意识到:其实目标并不存在。然后当我意识到目标不存在,或者说目标从未存在过。而如果那个目标从未存在过,那么最终那些指向一个假目标的念头会开始平息,因为它们是假的、无用的。用 Deutsch 的说法,那套知识不会再在我心里被复制。然后我就会处于平静,因为我会不再有这些自我中心的情绪和起伏。而我会意识到,这里从来就没有任何人。

48:52而一直以来,一切都只是意识。有些人把那称为上帝。>> 我需要一段时间才能把这一切消化。但这正是重点。>> 是啊。我是说,也许,有些人非常幸运,他们立刻就发生了。而大多数人从来不想它,所以也没关系。>> 对。你觉得,嗯,他们真的是开悟的人吗。>> 如果你问他们,你知道,我和他们每个人都以不同方式经历过这件事,但你知道,我测试过他们。我在这件事上有点自作聪明,但我测试过他们,看他们是否感受到情绪上的痛苦以任何方式,对吧?>> 我最喜欢的测试方式是,嗯,>> 你知道,最好的测试是微妙的,让他们察觉不到,你知道,不那么明显,但我喜欢问他们的是:那么,如果你没有

49:37开悟呢?如果你失去了你的开悟呢?或者如果你从未开悟过呢?他们对此完全无所谓,对吧?因为真相不会因为你知道或不知道而改变。而如果你不在那里知道真相,如果你不以任何分离的方式存在,那你知不知道都不重要。>> 对。而如果它在这个问题下崩了,那它 >> 那就是假的。>> 那是你身份的一部分 >> 融进了开悟里。>> 没错。>> 对。有意思。>> 但回到你刚才的问题:他们还能不能过自己的生活,你知道,有女朋友、有生意、有工作。能。

50:11绝对可以。他们确实是这样。我提到的那些人里,有些有工作,>> 其中一个在经营一家公司,你知道,嗯,其中一个特别擅长约会,约会很多,对吧?他们他们绝对有完全清明的心智。他们有完全能运作的身体。他们甚至有欲望。嗯,他们甚至有想要的东西和需求,但它们不是自我中心的。他们不裹在一个狭小的自我感里,那种自我很容易被威胁、会生气、会抑郁之类的。他们会采取你我会采取的行动,但他们采取时平静得多,而且不会把任何事往心里去。

50:52所以,他们仍在从环境中获得反馈。他们仍在做出反应。而且如果说有什么区别,我会说他们比以往任何时候都更有能力,他们的欲望更真实。他们更少模仿性。他们更少以地位为导向。那么,他们是否不如像我这样的人有动力?是的,我还没遇到过一个开悟的人像我这么有动力。另一方面,我也没遇到过多少像我这么有动力的人,对吧?也许,我觉得我这一生大概遇到过五个比我更有动力的人。对吧?所以,这两个集合很难有交集。>> 那我愿不愿意做这个交换,你知道,动力稍微少一点,换取开悟?当然愿意。我本来想问,你,嗯,既然离得这么近,你是否在追求它,还是你觉得 >> 你知道,不可能不去追求它,

51:33即使我知道那是个陷阱。它就像最闪亮的那个闪亮之物。就像,你知道,当你可以成为佛陀的时候,你为什么还要去创办下一家伟大的公司呢?>> 你知道,当你可以成为上帝本人的时候?就像,人类历史上大家公认的最伟大的人是谁?是耶稣、穆罕默德、佛陀,你知道,是那一批。甚至不是世界上的凯撒们。嗯,也许还有爱因斯坦们,对吧?但本质上都是求真者。求真者是最受敬仰的,还有艺术家。历史记得艺术家和求真者。而求真的艺术家是其中最高的,对吧?达芬奇之类。话虽如此,那是另一种追逐。那是另一种对永恒之物的追逐。那是另一种对闪亮之物的追逐。

52:09那是一种追逐「事物与现状不同」的追逐。而开悟者的关键之处在于,他们对一切本来的样子都安然。而这包括对事物现状不安然。他们会自我实现。>> 他们可能以更真实的方式自我实现,与开悟前的方式不同,但他们仍然自我实现。我对你打破这些虚假二分法的方式非常感兴趣,对吧?你刚才就提了一个,那就是,你知道,开悟而无动力的人可能更有效能。你知道,随着你变得更快乐,你也变得更有成效,尽管每个人都有这种恐惧:哦,如果我变得快乐,如果我接受现状,我会变得更没生产力。

52:54>> 是啊。你更愿意跟哪个作战?一个开悟的终结者,还是一个裹着自我的终结者。裹着自我的终结者更容易被操纵。它可能有内疚、可能有自我怀疑、可能有愤怒,效率会更低。而一个开悟的终结者才是真正的终结者。你得马上远离它。>> 有意思。>> 情绪有它的位置。现代社会非常安全。所以我们感受到的很多愤怒,来源于愤怒原本是为了身体暴力或身体原因而存在的时代。但现在我们把它当作精神层面的东西承受。很多现代的痛苦来自:我们把那些本该短暂、尖锐地被感受到的东西,变成了长期慢性地感受。

53:36所以我不觉得你因为更快乐就变得更低效。你会选择做不同的事。所以看起来可能像:哦,你在往坏的方向变,因为你可能看起来没那么有动力,或者动力指向了不同的东西,但你的动力指向的是某件会让你在保持快乐的同时更有效能的事。顺便说,没人会选择回到不那么快乐的状态。对。是啊,不,这就像钱一样。没人会选择回到贫穷。>> 严格占优策略。没错。>> 变快乐。>> 没错。这些是严格占优、支配性的策略。这些是纯粹的好东西。所以当人们说「我不看重幸福」时,那根本不是真的。从你自己的行为看就不是真的,因为每次你快乐的时候,你都不想放弃那份

54:14快乐。而每次你做某件事让自己稍微更快乐一点,你也不会放弃它。嗯,你知道,比如有件事,随着你走过人生的进程,有一个阶段你有室友,然后你到了没有室友的状态,对吧?你不想回到没有室友之前的生活,>> 但然后你有了孩子,他们是最糟的室友 >> 也是最好的。孩子长大离开时也挺难受的,对吧?>> 嗯,你不想回到通勤的日子,你知道,如果你曾经长途通勤,然后开始走路去上班或者通勤很短,再回到通勤会挺难受。

54:44嗯,退休,你知道,或者为自己工作。这些是单向门。很难再从那些门回来。>> 我问开悟者在关系方面的情况,因为,嗯,很多人问我「你有什么不同意见」,我觉得那是在测试我是不是只是个彻底的马屁精。嗯,而其实其中一件我一直最纠结的事是:你知道,只有个体独自上升。你所有的体验都是个体的,客观上说,我理解你作为个体感知的正确性,但我也知道,在我亲身经历和研究中,幸福有很大一部分来自我们与周围人的关系。我不得不认为那里有很多细微之处。你无法控制他们,但你是这些关系中的

55:29参与者,他们确实影响你日常的幸福感 >> 对,我们确实会分歧,因为我觉得,如果你被缠在需求感很强的关系里,很难快乐,而仅仅是「需要这段关系」本身就已经是需求感了。现在,显然,我有我的家人,我非常爱他们,他们对我很重要,但我不会留在一段让我不快乐的关系里。我会尽我的责任。我会履行我的义务。我会照顾他们,即使他们不喜欢我。但我不会去创造、停留或维持一段虚假的关系。而这就是真相。你所处的每一段关系,你身处其中是因为那个人为你提供了某种价值,或者因为在你的身份里你被绑住了、你对他们有某种义务,那也没关系。但如果,比如

56:19字面意义上你的妻子明天变了,她被一个恶魔附身,对你做尽可怕的事,你会离开,对吧?所以除了纯粹的血缘关系——那不一样——每一段关系都是如此。血缘关系是在基因层面的。你知道,你看到你的孩子就,以一种好的方式,疯了一样。每一段关系都是交易性的。它确实有价值交换的成分。它确实有付出与索取的期待。而它某种程度,你知道,听起来很好但不真,是假的。而这就是真相难的地方。如果真相很容易,人人都会去做,对吧?但这就是那些虚假的关系和那些虚假的

56:52义务之所以难的地方。比如我不会去我朋友的生日,除非我觉得那个派对会好玩。再比如我怎么会去婚礼呢,因为我觉得你知道,那基本上就是占用了大量时间从你的一天、你的一周里。目的地婚礼,天啊,对吧。我不去那些义务性的场合,比如「哦,某某要过周年纪念」「某某要办这个事」,你得去,你知道,或者「这些人需要你在场」之类的,不。那就是我划硬线的地方:不。义务——关系把你推入义务,然后义务把你推入痛苦。

57:27然后,你就不再拥有关系中令人愉快的部分了。现在我的生活里留下的,是那些同样自由、同样低自我的人。我们经常在一起,但那是自愿的。我们都想见彼此,我们都在彼此面前展现最好的自己,因为我们都想吸引对方。我们不把彼此视为理所当然,而那大概是关系里能发生的最糟的事。你必须把所有关系都当作投资,因为你想让它们活着。如果你看重它们,你就投入其中。但没有虚假的依恋。你知道,是需求感摧毁了一段关系,或者造出一段假关系。嗯,显然,有家庭,你就有义务,而你履行它们。嗯,

58:05而其实我没有任何一个疏远的家人。每个人都在我的生活里。家里的每个人。所以,你知道,这不是那种「你的家庭是破碎的,我们得修复世界」的情况。这个家庭运作得非常好。但与此同时,你必须自己一个人也能快乐。你知道,幸福关系的秘诀是两个快乐的人。好吗?嗯,因为你无法「和配偶一起快乐」。他们会拖累你,或者你会拖累他们。所以重要的是每个人自己找到幸福。而幸福是私人的。他们各自都必须去做这件事。你在关系里能做的最糟的事,就是跑去跟别人说「振作起来,开心点」。

58:41>> 你知道,「你怎么了?你为什么抑郁?」那没用,对吧。所以必须从个人层面着手。然后一旦你自己的家安顿好了,你才能和别人建立真实的关系。但把关系放在你自己的工作和你自己的幸福之前,我觉得是个错误。你两样都得不到。>> 我觉得那是个很好的表述:它们有价值,也重要。你想按那个顺序去追求它们。如果我描述得对的话,你的做法是,你想让它们最大限度地真实。比如你不想进入一段关系是为了让别人快乐。我也不想让他们为了让我快乐而做那些

59:18不诚实的事。我不想让他们,你知道,觉得我是个负担或一项义务。你知道,我有的一个困扰是,嗯,作为父母,我为我的孩子做些事因为我爱他们 >> 而我周围的人总想训练他们说谢谢。他们会说:「哦,你知道,你爸给了你东西,你说谢谢了吗?」我就说:「别,别这样。别训练他们。他们不是动物。」就像,如果他们真心感到感激,它会以某种方式流露出来。我不需要它。我做这些不是为了感激。对。>> 对。而我不想把他们像动物一样训练。如果他们真心感激,它会流露出来,你知道?如果不是,就不会。但别,别强迫它。我不想任何被强加的义务关系,

59:59两个方向都不想要。>> 对。>> 我唯一相信的关系是平等的关系。比如显然有人为你工作,但即使那样,你也总想在情况允许下尽可能把他们当同辈对待。嗯,因为否则它最终会形式化。最终会仪式化。最终会虚假。最终会不快乐。嗯,你知道,你会发现有趣的是,如果你去一个像婚礼这样的活动,或者去一个大型派对,很多时候你会发现大量关于幸福的表演,你知道,人们在欢呼。对。你知道,但那不是真货,真货很少在那里。真正的幸福来自更小、更真实、更少强制的互动。

1:00:42就像如果你被强迫穿燕尾服,被强迫在某个时间出现,然后被强迫听一段演讲,然后被强迫去敬酒,然后被强迫到处走,那就像——那不是真正让你快乐的东西。如果那真的是让你快乐的方式,那你每天都会这么做。你会去每一个派对、每一场婚礼、每一个成人礼、每一个你被邀请的场合。但在某种程度上,那些事很乏味。你做这些是为了别人,他们做这些是为了你。就像,谁是为了自己做的呢,对吧?所以我觉得真正的庆祝是美好的事,但它被仪式化得太厉害了 >> 比如情人节,必须送

1:01:17花,你知道,贺曼贺卡,这一切都是仪式化的。嗯,真正的幸福是当你真心对某人心怀感激,你知道,你为他们做件善事只因为你想做,而你必须在生活中为它腾出空间,你必须创造一些情境,让你真实地感受到它,让人们真心地激起你心中的这种感觉。我不想要任何仪式化的东西。我从来都不想要一张贺卡。我从来不想要一个,你知道,仪式化的礼物。我不想要一枚奖章。我不想要一个奖项。你知道,所有这些都没用。>> 我本来想问你,你知道,怎么帮人们在生活中找到那种勇气,去那样真实。但,你知道,我觉得这就回到长期视角:你知道,真相,即使它带来

1:02:07短期的痛苦,比如「嘿,我不会为了让你们快乐而做这件事」「我不希望你只是为了让我快乐而做这件事」,这才是长期创造它的最好方式。>> 完全正确。但我觉得它比那更深。它是:真相不可谈判。就像,给我找一个说「我不想要真相」的人。那是很少见的人,对吧?>> 嗯,明说的偏好嘛。我觉得大概有很多人选择活在谎言里。>> 我觉得他们是不想让人失望 >> 我觉得所以我们都困在这个集体陷阱里,>> 对吧?就像新冠做的一件好事,是它打破了通勤的集体陷阱,

1:02:42>> 对吧?它让居家办公变得正当。现在有些人可能走得太远,他们干脆完全脱离工作。但总体来说,它打破了社会对通勤、对不必要的通勤、对不必要的会议的瘾,那是好事。所以我觉得同样地,如果我们能打破社会对排场和虚礼的瘾,那就好了,>> 对吧?比如情人节,那应该和你爱的人随时、自发而自然地发生,而不是在二月十四日,每个人都想挤进同一家定价过高的餐厅,买同样定价过高的花,送同样的

1:03:16定价过高的巧克力,同一个盒子,对吧?而如果你并不自然而然地想做这件事,那意味着你的关系有些问题,你应该修复它,或者你应该走向另一段关系。但错误的答案是去做这种每年打个勾的虚假动作,把事情往后拖。只是在浪费所有人的时间。